Definition
Mate selection has been a topic of great interest and has gained much attention from diverse fields (Zhang et al. 2015, 2016). Mate selection strategies overlap with reproductive strategies that encompass a broad set of behaviors involving the timing of reproduction and the trade-off between quantity and quality of offspring (Buss and Schmitt 1993). Weatherhead and Robertson (1979) proposed the sexy son hypothesis claiming that females are assumed to compensate for the survival of their offspring by increasing the number of descendants produced (Huk and Winkel 2008). The sexy son hypothesis also implies that a potential mate’s capability as a parental care-giver are irrelevant to his value as the potential father or the female’s descendant.
Introduction
Darwin’s theory...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Alatalo, R. V. (1998). Mate choice for offspring performance: Major benefits or minor costs? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 265(1412), 2297–2297. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1998.0574.
Andersson, M., & Simmons, L. W. (2006). Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21(6), 296–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.03.015.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204.
Darwin, C. R. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. New York: Appleton.
Huk, T., & Winkel, W. (2008). Testing the sexy son hypothesis – A research framework for empirical approaches. Behavioral Ecology, 19(2), 456–461. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arm150.
Ligon, J. D. (1999). The evolution of avian breeding systems. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6885842.
Mead, L. S., & Arnold, S. J. (2004). Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19(5), 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.003.
Orians, G. H. (1961). The ecology of blackbird (Agelaius) social system. Ecological Monographs, 31(3), 285–312. https://doi.org/10.2307/1948556.
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.
Weatherhead, P. J., & Robertson, R. J. (1979). Offspring quality and the polygyny threshold: “The sexy son hypothesis”. The American Naturalist, 113(2), 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1086/283379.JSTOR2460199.
Zhang, L., Liu, S., Li, Y., & Ruan, L. J. (2015). Heterosexual rejection and mate choice: A sociometer perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1846. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01846.
Zhang, L., Liu, S., Li, Y., & Ruan, L. J. (2016). Long-run effect of heterosexual rejection on mating behavior for college students: Based on the sociometer theory. Journal of Psychological Science, 39(1), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20160120.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Liu, S., Zhang, C., Chen, Y., Guo, W., Zhang, X. (2019). Mate Selection Strategy (Version of Sexy Sons Hypothesis). In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1762-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1762-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences