Skip to main content

Male Dominance Hierarchies

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 86 Accesses

Dominance relationships refer to asymmetries of control within dyads of individuals. Whether this control is exerted over nutritional resources, space, or sexual partners does not fundamentally matter, as long as framing social interactions in terms of dominance enables the observer to better predict the outcome of these interactions (Bernstein 1981). For example, the concept of dominance can be invoked when predicting that if A has won over B in the past, then A will also win over B in the future or that if A prevails over B when competing for food, then A will also prevail over B when competing for space or sexual partners.

By contrast, dominance hierarchiesrefer to the transitive manifestation of the aforementioned asymmetries within a social group, such that if one has observed that A dominates B and B dominates C, then one can deduce that A will dominate C. This transitivity criterion plays a key normative role in determining which behavioral metrics are suitable for the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Adler, N. E., Boyce, T., Chesney, M. A., et al. (1994). Socioeconomic status and health. The challenge of the gradient. The American Psychologist, 49, 15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, I. S. (1981). Dominance: The baby and the bathwater. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 419–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burmeister, S. S., Jarvis, E. D., & Fernald, R. D. (2005). Rapid behavioral and genomic responses to social opportunity. PLoS Biology, 3, e363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duke, A. A., Bègue, L., Bell, R., & Eisenlohr-Moul, T. (2013). Revisiting the serotonin-aggression relation in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 1148–1172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. H., & Kravitz, E. A. (1997). Serotonin, social status and aggression. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 7, 812–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, L., & Lee, E. (1995). Dominance and reproductive success among nonhuman animals: A cross-species comparison. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 257–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, N., & Crews, D. (1990). Endocrine and behavioral responses to aggression and social dominance in the green anole lizard, Anolis carolinensis. General and Comparative Endocrinology, 77, 246–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havlicek, J., Roberts, S. C., & Flegr, J. (2005). Women’s preference for dominant male odour: Effects of menstrual cycle and relationship status. Biology Letters, 1, 256–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maier, S. F., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2016). Learned helplessness at fifty: Insights from neuroscience. Psychological Review, 123, 349–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton-Fisher, N. E., Thompson, M. E., Reynolds, V., et al. (2009). Paternity and social rank in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) from the Budongo Forest, Uganda. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 142, 417–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, G. R., van Noordwijk, M. A., & van Schaik, C. (2012). A model for the evolution of developmental arrest in male orangutans. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 149, 18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, J. (1967). The dominance hierarchy and the evolution of mental illness. Lancet, 290, 243–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qu, C., Ligneul, R., Van der Henst, J.-B., & Dreher, J.-C. (2017). An integrative interdisciplinary perspective on social dominance hierarchies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21, 893–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roney, J. R., & Simmons, Z. L. (2008). Women’s estradiol predicts preference for facial cues of men’s testosterone. Hormones and Behavior, 53, 14–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowell, T. E. (1974). The concept of social dominance. Behavioral Biology, 11, 131–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutte, C., Taborsky, M., & Brinkhof, M. W. G. (2006). What sets the odds of winning and losing? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21, 16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapolsky, R. M. (2004). Social status and health in humans and other animals. Annual Review of Anthropology, 33, 393–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schjelderup-Ebbe, T. (1921) Gallus domesticus in seinem täglichen Leben. Universitat Greifswald.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Romain Ligneul .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Ligneul, R. (2018). Male Dominance Hierarchies. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_165-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_165-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics