Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Same-Sex Friendships

  • Melikşah DemirEmail author
  • Luke Chiverton
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1610-1

Synonyms

Definition

Same-sex friendship is a nonsexual and nonfamilial communal bond characterized by voluntary independence between two same-sex individuals.

Introduction

Friendship is a unique dyadic relationship that is not only cherished but also sought after for a variety of reasons in almost every culture studied. Not surprisingly, there is a word describing a relationship established outside the kin environment in nearly all cultures and languages. Even though some of these words share a common root with kin-relation words, they over time became uniquely associated with the idea of friendship (Krappman 1996).

One critical issue in defining friendship concerns the possible overlap with other relationships. The theorized lack of sexual relations between friends differentiates it from relationships specifically formed to address mate attraction and retention. Also, the idea of voluntary interdependence as one of the defining feature of friendship...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bank, B. J., & Hansford, S. L. (2000). Gender and friendship: Why are men’s best same-sex friendships less intimate and supportive? Personal Relationships, 7, 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benenson, J. F., Markovits, H., Fitzgerald, C., Geoffroy, D., Flemming, J., Kahlenberg, S. M., & Wrangham, R. W. (2009). Males’ greater tolerance of same-sex peers. Psychological Science, 20(2), 184–190. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02269.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Benenson, J. F., Kuhn, M. N., Ryan, P. J., Ferranti, A. J., Blondin, R., Shea, M., Charpentier, C., Thompson, M. E., & Wrangham, R. W. (2014). Human males appear more prepared than females to resolve conflicts with same-sex peers. Human Nature, 25(2), 251–268. doi: 10.1007/s12110-014-9198-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bleske, A. L., & Shackelford, T. K. (2001). Poaching, promiscuity, and deceit: Combatting mating rivalry in same-sex friendships. Personal Relationships, 8(4), 407–424. doi: 10.1007/s12110-010-9081-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buss, D. (2015). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind (5th ed.). New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, Y. A. (1966). Patterns of friendship. In Y. A. Cohen (Ed.), Social structure and personality (pp. 351–386). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
  7. David-Barrett, T., Rotkirch, A., Carney, J., Izquierdo, I. B., Krems, J. A., Townley, D., McDaniell, E., Byrne-Smith, A., & Dunbar, R. I. (2015). Women favour dyadic relationships, but men prefer clubs: Cross-cultural evidence from social networking. PloS One, 10(3), e0118329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118329.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Demir, M., & Orthel, H. (2011). Friendship, real–ideal discrepancies, and well-being: Gender differences in college students. The Journal of Psychology, 145(3), 173–193. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2010.548413.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Demir, M., Orthel-Clark, H., Özdemir, M., & Özdemir, S. B. (2015). Friendship and happiness among young adults. In M. Demir (Ed.), Friendship and happiness: Across the life-span and cultures (pp. 117–136). Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9603-3_7.Google Scholar
  10. DeScioli, P., & Kurzban, R. (2009). The alliance hypothesis for human friendship. PloS One, 4(6), e5802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005802.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Diener, E., & Chan, M. Y. (2011). Happy people live longer: Subjective well-being contributes to health and longevity. Applied Psychology. Health and Well-Being, 3(1), 1–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-0854.2010.01045.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hall, J. A. (2016). Same-sex friendships. In C. R. Berger & M. E. Roloff (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of interpersonal communication (pp. 1519–1526). Chichester: Wiley. doi: 10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic138.Google Scholar
  13. Hartup, W. W., & Stevens, N. (1997). Friendships and adaptation in the life course. Psychological Bulletin, 121(3), 355–370. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Holt-Lunstad, J. (2016). Friendship and health. In M. Hojjat & A. Moyer (Eds.), The psychology of friendship (pp. 233–248). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hruschka, D. J. (2010). Friendship: Development, ecology, and evolution of a relationship. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Krappman, L. (1996). Amicitia, drujba, shin-yu, philia, freundschaft, friendship: On the cultural diversity of a human relationship. In W. M. Bukowski, A. F. Newcomb, & W. W. Hartup (Eds.), The company they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence (pp. 19–40). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lewis, D. M., Conroy-Beam, D., Al-Shawaf, L., Raja, A., DeKay, T., & Buss, D. M. (2011). Friends with benefits: The evolved psychology of same-and opposite-sex friendship. Evolutionary Psychology, 9(4), 543–563.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Park, J. H., & Ackerman, J. M. (2011). Passion and compassion: Psychology of kin relations within and beyond the family. In T. K. Shackelford & C. A. Salmon (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of evolutionary family psychology (pp. 329–344). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Shackelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M. (1996). Betrayal in mateships, friendships, and coalitions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1151–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Taylor, S. E., Klein, L. C., Lewis, B. P., Gruenewald, T. L., Gurung, R. A., & Updegraff, J. A. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological Review, 107(3), 411–429.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1996). Friendship and the banker’s paradox: Other pathways to the evolution of adaptations for altruism. Proceedings of the British Academy, 88, 119–143.Google Scholar
  22. Vigil, J. M. (2007). Asymmetries in the friendship preferences and social styles of men and women. Human Nature, 18(2), 143–161. doi: 10.1007/s12110-007-9003-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Wright, P. H. (1982). Men’s friendships, women’s friendships and the alleged inferiority of the latter. Sex Roles, 8(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychological SciencesNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Kevin Beaver
    • 1
  1. 1.Florida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA