Skip to main content

Concurrent Mate Retention Tactics

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 347 Accesses

Definition

Concurrent mate retention tactics are defined as mate retention tactics that are complementary, such that the use of one tactic supports the use of another.

Introduction: The Taxonomy of Mate Retention

Once an individual secures a long-term mate or romantic partner, the individual has the adaptive problem of retaining the mate. As the word “retain” may be generally defined as “to keep possession or use of”, mate retention tactics might be considered to have as their aim the prevention of a mate from permanently defecting from or abandoning a long-term relationship. Although they do serve this purpose, mate retention tactics can also reduce the likelihood that a long-term mate will commit an infidelity or temporarily defect from a relationship by engaging in extra-pair copulations (EPCs). Mate retention tactics are, therefore, considered to be tactics that serve both purposes (e.g., Buss 1988; Shackelford et al. 2005). It follows that whether a particular mate retention...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1993). Human sperm competition: Ejaculate adjustment by males and the function of masturbation. Animal Behaviour, 46, 861–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1988). From vigilance to violence: Tactics of mate retention in American undergraduates. Ethology & Sociobiology, 9, 291–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). From vigilance to violence: Mate retention tactics in married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 346–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., & McKibbin, W. F. (2008). The mate retention inventory-short form (MRI-SF). Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 322–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKibbin, W. F., Goetz, A. T., Shackelford, T. K., Schipper, L. D., Starratt, V. G., & Stewart-Williams, S. (2007). Why do men insult their intimate partners? Personality and Individual Differences, 43(2), 231–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford, T. K., LeBlanc, G. J., Weekes-Shackelford, V. A., Bleske-Rechek, A. L., Euler, H. A., & Hoier, S. (2002). Psychological adaptation to human sperm competition. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 123–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford, T. K., Goetz, A. T., & Buss, D. M. (2005). Mate retention in marriage: Further evidence of the reliability of the Mate Retention Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 415–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford, T. K., Goetz, A. T., Guta, F. E., & Schmitt, D. P. (2006). Mate guarding and frequent in-pair copulation in humans: Concurrent or compensatory anti-cuckoldry tactics? Human Nature, 17, 239–252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., & Alcock, J. (1983). The evolution of insect mating systems. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alastair Davies .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Davies, A. (2016). Concurrent Mate Retention Tactics. In: Weekes-Shackelford, V., Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_152-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_152-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics