Skip to main content

Universal Aspects of Kinship

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science
  • 706 Accesses

Synonyms

Kinship universals; Panhuman manifestations of genealogical relationships

Definition

Behavioral aspects of kinship found in all human societies.

Introduction

Humans exhibit by far the most extensive and internally differentiated networks of kinship of all animal species. Correlatively the importance of kinship in regulating social life in humans is unequaled in the animal world. If this is not evident in modern state societies in which kin represent a small fraction of an individual’s social network, it is salient in small-scale societies, notably in groups of hunter-gatherers whose mode of subsistence characterized our ancestors over 99.5 % of the 2.5 million years of evolution of the genus Homo. If only for that reason, kinship is expected to have played a central role in shaping the social life and social cognition of hominins and hence to be deeply ingrained in human nature.

Unsurprisingly from that perspective, cultural anthropology was born with the scientific study of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Apostolou, M. (2007). Sexual selection under parental choice: The role of parents in the evolution of human mating. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 403–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apostolou, M. (2010). Sexual selection under parental choice in agropastoral societies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, C. M. (2011). Kinship: Family ties and social behavior. In C. J. Campbell, A. Fuentes, K. C. MacKinnon, S. K. Bearder, & R. M. Stumpf (Eds.), Primates in perspectives (pp. 576–587). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgerhoff Mulder, M., Bowles, S., Hertz, T., et al. (2009). Intergenerational wealth transmission and the dynamics of inequality in small-scale societies. Science, 236, 682–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends in Cognitive Science, 12, 187–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapais, B. (2006). Kinship, competence, and cooperation in primates. In P. M. Kappeler & C. van Schaik (Eds.), Cooperation in primates and humans: Mechanisms and evolution (pp. 47–64). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chapais, B. (2008). Primeval kinship: How pair-bonding gave birth to human society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapais, B. (2011). The evolutionary history of pair-bonding and parental collaboration. In C. Salmon & T. Shackelford (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of evolutionary family psychology (pp. 33–50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapais, B. (2014). Complex kinship patterns as evolutionary constructions, and the origins of sociocultural universals. Current Anthropology, 55, 751–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapais, B. (2016). Psychological adaptations and the production of culturally polymorphic social universals. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000079.

  • Charpentier, M. J. E., Widdig, A., & Alberts, S. C. (2007). Inbreeding depression in nonhuman primates: A historical review of methods used and empirical data. American Journal of Primatology, 69, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Watkins, C. D., Roberts, S. C., Little, A. C., Smith, F. G., & Quist, M. (2011). Opposite-sex siblings decrease attraction, but not prosocial attributions, to self-resembling opposite-sex faces. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 11710–11714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, R. (1967). Kinship and marriage: An anthropological perspective. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodenough, W. H. (1970). Description and comparison in cultural anthropology. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurven, M., & Hill, K. (2009). Why do men hunt? A reevaluation of “Man the Hunter” and the sexual division of labor. Current Anthropology, 50, 51–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hage, P. (1997). Unthinkable categories and the fundamental laws of kinship. American Ethnologist, 24, 652–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. (2010). Human kinship, from conceptual structure to grammar. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 367–416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kronenfeld, D. B. (2006). Issues in the classification of kinship terminologies: Toward a new typology. Anthropos, 101, 203–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langergraber, K. E. (2012). Cooperation among kin. In J. Mitani, J. Call, P. M. Kappeler, R. A. Palombit, & J. B. Silk (Eds.), The evolution of primate societies (pp. 491–513). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langergraber, K. E., Mitani, J. C., & Vigilant, L. (2007). The limited impact of kinship on cooperation in wild chimpanzees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 7786–7790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langergraber, K. E., Mitani, J. C., & Vigilant, L. (2009). Kinship and social bonds in female chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). American Journal of Primatology, 71, 840–851.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, D., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2007). The architecture of human kin detection. Nature, 445, 727–731.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. H., Schaller, M., & van Vugt, M. (2008). Psychology of human kin recognition: Heuristic cues, erroneous inferences, and their implications. Review of General Psychology, 12, 215–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, A., & Kuester, J. (2004). The impact of kinship on mating and reproduction. In B. Chapais & C. M. Berman (Eds.), Kinship and behavior in primates (pp. 271–291). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendall, D. (2004). ‘Recognizing’ kin: Mechanisms, media, minds, modules, and muddles. In B. Chapais & C. M. Berman (Eds.), Kinship and behavior in primates (pp. 295–316). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodseth, L., Wrangham, R. W., Harrigan, A. M., & Smuts, B. B. (1991). The human community as a primate society. Current Anthropology, 32, 221–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (2012). Knowledge of social relations. In J. Mitani, J. Call, P. M. Kappeler, R. A. Palombit, & J. B. Silk (Eds.), The evolution of primate societies (pp. 628–642). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silk, J. B. (2009). Nepotistic cooperation in nonhuman primate groups. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 3243–3254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, L. (2014). Kinship and gender. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widdig, A. (2007). Paternal kin discrimination: The evidence and likely mechanisms. Biological Review, 82, 319–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, A. P., & Durham, W. H. (Eds.). (2004). Inbreeding, incest, and the incest taboo: The state of knowledge at the turn of the century. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R. W. (1982). Mutualism, kinship and social evolution. In King’s College Sociobiology Group (Ed.), Current problems in sociobiology (pp. 269–289). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernard Chapais .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Chapais, B. (2016). Universal Aspects of Kinship. In: Weekes-Shackelford, V., Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1502-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1502-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics