Skip to main content

Full Siblings Versus Half Siblings

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Synonyms

Genetic relatedness; Sibling relationships

Definition

Full siblings share the same biological mother and father, maternal half-siblings share the same mother only, and paternal half-siblings share the same father only. Therefore, full siblings share, on average, 50% of their genes with one another and half siblings share approximately 25%. Because individuals share more genes with their full siblings than their half siblings on average, full siblings are predicted to invest more in each other compared to half siblings. By investing in full rather than half siblings, individuals can more effectively increase their own inclusive fitness.

Introduction

Individuals tend to invest time and resources in their kin. Evolutionary researchers have explained this by inclusive fitness theory (Hamilton 1964), which assumes that the degree of genetic relatedness is associated with the investment directed towards relatives. Individuals share approximately 50% of their genes with full...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Cicirelli, V. G. (1995). Sibling relationships across the life span. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M., & Wilson, M. I. (1988). Homicide. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielsbacka, M. & Tanskanen, A.O. (2015). The Association between Unequal Parental Treatment and the Sibling Relationship in Finland: The Difference between Full and Half Siblings. Evolutionary Psychology, 13, 492–510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour I, II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, W. G., & Sherman, P. W. (1982). The ontogeny of kin recognition in two species of ground squirrels. American Zoologist, 22, 491–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, R., & Trillmich, F. (2008). Sibling competition and cooperation in mammals: Challenges, developments and prospects. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 62, 299–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jankowiak, W., & Diderich, M. (2000). Sibling solidarity in a polygamous community in the USA: Unpacking inclusive fitness. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 21, 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, D., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2007). The architecture of human kin detection. Nature, 445, 727–731.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mock, D. W., & Parker, G. A. (1997). The evolution of sibling rivalry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollet, T. V. (2007). Genetic relatedness and sibling relationship characteristics in a modern society. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 176–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollet, T. V., & Hoben, A. D. (2011). An evolutionary perspective on siblings: Rivals and resources. In C. A. Salmon & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), The Oxford handbook on evolutionary family psychology (pp. 128–148). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, C. A., & Hehman, J. A. (2014). The evolutionary psychology of sibling conflict and siblicide. In T. K. Shackelford & R. D. Hansen (Eds.), The evolution of violence (pp. 137–157). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, C. A., & Hehman, J. A. (2015). Evolutionary perspectives on the nature of sibling conflict: The impact of sex, relatedness, and co-residence. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 1, 123–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, C. A., & Shackelford, T. K. (Eds.). (2011). The Oxford handbook on evolutionary family psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanskanen, A. O., & Danielsbacka, M. (2014). Genetic relatedness predicts contact frequencies with siblings, nieces and nephews: Results from the generational transmissions in Finland surveys. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanskanen, A. O., Danielsbacka, M., & Rotkirch, A. (2015). More injuries in half sibling than full sibling households in the UK. Journal of Individual Differences, 36, 177–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanskanen, A. O., Danielsbacka, M., Jokela, M., David-Barrett, T., & Rotkirch, A. (2016). Diluted competition? Conflicts between full and half siblings in two adult generations. Frontiers in Sociology, 1, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanskanen, A. O., Danielsbacka, M., Jokela, M., & Rotkirch, A. (2017). Sibling conflicts in full-and half-sibling households in the UK. Journal of Biosocial Science, 49, 31–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1974). Parent–offspring conflict. American Zoologist, 14, 249–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antti O. Tanskanen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Tanskanen, A.O., Danielsbacka, M. (2017). Full Siblings Versus Half Siblings. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1496-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1496-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics