Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Nonverbal Indicators of Dominance

  • Kristofor McCartyEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1415-1

Synonyms

Definition

Dominance in large part is having power or influence over others. An important part of negotiating access to resources, be it food or mates, throughout the animal kingdom and ancestral humans is/has been achieved through physical force, particularly between males. For example, men who repeatedly win fights and contests against other men (intrasexual selection) are often revered in society, and their status within the group is elevated (Hill and Hurtado 1996). This functions as a deterrent to potential competitors from challenge and is known as physical dominance, which will be the focus of this section.

Introduction

The ability to make accurate assessments of physical dominance in species with aggressive social interactions is of particular importance as it can ultimately fall within the realm of natural selection. People who have the potential to inflict serious or even fatal physical harm is a strong selective force and it makes...

Keywords

Dominance Status Facial Hair Dominance Rating Fighting Ability Intrasexual Selection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Haselhuhn, M. P., Ormiston, M. E., & Wong, E. M. (2015). Men’s facial width-to-height ratio predicts aggression: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 10(4), e0122637. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122637. Last retrieved 16 Feb 2016.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Hill, K. R., & Hurtado, A. M. (1996). Ache life history: The ecology and demography of a foraging people. Piscataway: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Keeley, L. H. (1996). War before civilization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Koppensteiner, M., Stephan, P., & Jäschke, J. P. M. (2016). Moving speeches: Dominance, trustworthiness and competence in body motion. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 101–106. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.013. Last retrieved 16 Feb 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kozlowski, D., Brooks, A., & van der Zwan, R. (2016). The disconnect between observers’ male and masculine judgments from sparse gait cues conveying gender: Perceiving precarious manhood. Gender Issues. doi:10.1007/s12147-016-9151-z. Last retrieved 16 Feb 2016.Google Scholar
  6. Lefevre, C. E., & Lewis, G. J. (2014). Perceiving aggression from facial structure: Further evidence for a positive association with facial width-to-height ratio and masculinity, but not for moderation by self-reported dominance. European Journal of Personality, 28, 530–537. doi:10.1002/per.1942. Last retrieved 16 Feb 2016.Google Scholar
  7. Lefevre, C. E., Lewis, G. J., Perrett, D. I., & Penke, L. (2013). Telling facial metrics: Facial width is associated with testosterone levels in men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(4), 273–279. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.03.005. Last retrieved 16 Feb 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mazur, A., & Booth, A. (1998). Testosterone and dominance in men. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 353–363; discussion 363–397. Retrieved from http://cogprints.org/663/1/bbs_mazur.html. Last retrieved 9 Mar 2016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Neave, N., Laing, S., Fink, B., & Manning, J. T. (2003). Second to fourth digit ratio, testosterone and perceived male dominance. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 270, 2167–2172. doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2502. Last retrieved 16 Feb 2016.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Penton-Voak, I. S., & Chen, J. Y. (2004). High salivary testosterone is linked to masculine male facial appearance in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 229–241. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.04.003. Last retrieved 16 Feb 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Puts, D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 157–175. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.005. Last retrieved 16 Feb 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Roney, J. R., Hanson, K. N., Durante, K. M., & Maestripieri, D. (2006). Reading men’s faces: Women’s mate attractiveness judgments track men’s testosterone and interest in infants. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273(1598), 2169–2175. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3569. Last retrieved 02/16/16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Saxton, T. K., Mackey, L. L., McCarty, K., & Neave, N. (2015). A lover or a fighter? Opposing sexual selection pressures on men’s vocal pitch and facial hair. Behavioral Ecology, 1–8. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arv178. Last retrieved 16 Feb 2016.Google Scholar
  14. Schouten, B., Troje, N. F., & Verfaillie, K. (2011). The facing bias in biological motion perception: Structure, kinematics, and body parts. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(1), 130–143. doi:10.3758/s13414-010-0018-1. Last retrieved 16 Feb 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sell, A., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., Sznycer, D., von Rueden, C., & Gurven, M. (2009). Human adaptations for the visual assessment of strength and fighting ability from the body and face. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276(1656), 575–584. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.1177. Last retrieved 16 Feb 2016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sell, A., Hone, L. S. E., & Pound, N. (2012). The importance of physical strength to human males. Human Nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.), 23(1), 30–44. doi:10.1007/s12110-012-9131-2. Last retrieved 16 Feb 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Troje, N. F. (2003). Cat walk and western hero–motion is expressive. IGSN Report, 40–43. Retrieved from http://130.15.96.239/Text/IGSN_Troje2003.pdf. Last retrieved 16 Feb 2016.
  18. Watkins, C. D., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2010). Individual differences in dominance perception: Dominant men are less sensitive to facial cues of male dominance. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 967–971. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.006. Last retrieved 16 Feb 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Watkins, C. D., Debruine, L. M., Feinberg, D., & Jones, B. C. (2013). A sex difference in the context-sensitivity of dominance perceptions. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(5), 366–372. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.06.004. Last retrieved 16 Feb 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyNorthumbria UniversityNewcastle upon-TyneUK