Skip to main content

Male–Male Strategies

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science
  • 1045 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Able, D. J. (1999). Scramble competition selects for greater tailfin size in male red-spotted newts (Amphibia: Salamandridae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 46(6), 423–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcock, J. (1994). Postinsemination associations between males and females in insects: The mate-guarding hypothesis. Annual Review of Entomology, 39, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, M. B. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, C. M., Barnett, R., & Dukas, R. (2015). Aggression, mate guarding and fitness in male fruit flies. Animal Behaviour, 109, 235–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berglund, A., Bisazza, A., & Pilastro, A. (1996). Armaments and ornaments: An evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 58(4), 385–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blagosklonny, M. V. (2008). Aging: ROS or TOR. Cell Cycle, 7(21), 3344–3354.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Candolin, U. (2000). Changes in expression and honesty of sexual signalling over the reproductive lifetime of sticklebacks. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B, 267(1460), 2425–2430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candolin, U., & Tukiainen, I. (2015). The sexual selection paradigm: have we overlooked other mechanisms in the evolution of male ornaments? Proceedings of the Royal Society London B, 282(1816), 20151987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DuVal, E. H., & Kempenaers, B. (2008). Sexual selection in a lekking bird: The relative opportunity for selection by female choice and male competition. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 275(1646), 1995–2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hämäläinen, A., Alatalo, R. V., Lebigre, C., Siitari, H., & Soulsbury, C. D. (2012). Fighting behaviour as a correlate of male mating success in black grouse Tetrao tetrix. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 66(12), 1577–1586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingleby, F. C. (2015). Insect cuticular hydrocarbons as dynamic traits in sexual communication. Insects, 6(3), 732–742.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kojima, W., Sugiura, S., Makihara, H., Ishikawa, Y., & Takanashi, T. (2014). Rhinoceros beetles suffer male-biased predation by mammalian and avian predators. Zoological Science, 31(3), 109–115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Küpper, C., Stocks, M., Risse, J. E., dos Remedios, N., Farrell, L. L., McRae, S. B., & Kitaysky, A. S. (2016). A supergene determines highly divergent male reproductive morphs in the ruff. Nature Genetics, 48, 79–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, S. M., Dickinson, A. W., Tregenza, T., & House, C. M. (2016). Sexual selection on male cuticular hydrocarbons via male-male competition and female choice. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. doi:10.1111/jeb.12875.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lemaître, J. F., Gaillard, J. M., Pemberton, J. M., Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Nussey, D. H. (2014). Early life expenditure in sexual competition is associated with increased reproductive senescence in male red deer. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 281(1792), 20140792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, E. L. (2014). Mechanical limits to maximum weapon size in a giant rhinoceros beetle. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 281(1786), 20140696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, E. L., & Simmons, L. W. (2016). Selection on male physical performance during male–male competition and female choice. Behavioral Ecology. doi:10.1093/beheco/arw033.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, A. J., & Moore, P. J. (1999). Balancing sexual selection through opposing mate choice and male competition. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 266(1420), 711–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neff, B. D. (2003). Decisions about parental care in response to perceived paternity. Nature, 422(6933), 716–719.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neff, B. D., & Gross, M. R. (2001). Dynamic adjustment of parental care in response to perceived paternity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 268(1476), 1559–1565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. A. (2014). The sexual cascade and the rise of pre-ejaculatory (Darwinian) sexual selection, sex roles, and sexual conflict. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 6(10), a017509.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Passos, C., Tassino, B., Rosenthal, G. G., & Reichard, M. (2015). Reproductive behavior and sexual selection in annual fishes. In N. Berios et al. (Eds.), Annual fishes: Life history strategy, diversity, and evolution. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polačik, M., & Reichard, M. (2009). Indirect fitness benefits are not related to male dominance in a killifish. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 63(10), 1427–1435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reby, D., & McComb, K. (2003). Anatomical constraints generate honesty: Acoustic cues to age and weight in the roars of red deer stags. Animal Behaviour, 65(3), 519–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichard, M., Smith, C., & Jordan, W. C. (2004). Genetic evidence reveals density-dependent mediated success of alternative mating behaviours in the European bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus). Molecular Ecology, 13(6), 1569–1578.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reichard, M., Bryja, J., Ondračková, M., Dávidová, M., Kaniewska, P., & Smith, C. (2005). Sexual selection for male dominance reduces opportunities for female mate choice in the European bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus). Molecular Ecology, 14(5), 1533–1542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichard, M., Le Comber, S. C., & Smith, C. (2007). Sneaking from a female perspective. Animal Behaviour, 74(4), 679–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., & Reichard, M. (2005). Females solicit sneakers to improve fertilisation success in the bitterling fish (Rhodeus sericeus). Proceedings of the Royal Society London B, 272(1573), 1683–1688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wootton, R. J., & Smith, C. (2015). Reproductive biology of teleost fishes. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuk, M., & Kolluru, G. R. (1998). Exploitation of sexual signals by predators and parasitoids. Quarterly Review of Biology, 73, 415–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Reichard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Reichard, M. (2016). Male–Male Strategies. In: Weekes-Shackelford, V., Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_108-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_108-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics