Skip to main content

Non-ablative Radiofrequency for Facial Rejuvenation

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Lasers, Lights and Other Technologies

Abstract

Over the last decades, non- or minimally invasive skin rejuvenation techniques have shown continuous and growing demand. Although surgical procedures are the “gold standard” for facial and body skin sagging treatment, many patients choose procedures with lower downtime, even if it means more subtle results, because they don’t want to be away from their work and social activities. In order to fulfill this need, a range of non-ablative devices was introduced, such as lasers, devices using light sources – as intense pulsed light (IPL) – and radiofrequency. This chapters discuss radiofrequency, an extremely valuable therapeutic for rejuvenation, as it allows patients to keep realizing their activities and also provides “natural” results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abraham MT, Mashkevich G. Monopolar radiofrequency skin tightening. Facial Plast Surg Clin N Am. 2007;15(2):169–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afrooz PN, Pozner JN, DiBernardo BE. Noninvasive and minimally invasive techniques in body contouring. Clin Plast Surg. 2014;41(4):789–804.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alexiades-Armenakas MR, Dover JS, Arndt KA. The spectrum of laser skin resurfacing: nonablative, fractional, and ablative laser resurfacing. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58(5):719–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alster TS, Lupton JR. Nonablative cutaneous remodeling using radiofrequency devices. Clin Dermatol. 2007;25(5):487–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bogle MA, Dover JS. Tissue tightening technologies. Dermatol Clin. 2009;27(4):491–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bogle MA, Ubelhoer N, Weiss RA, Mayoral F, Kaminer MS. Evaluation of the multiple pass, low fluence algorithm for radiofrequency tightening of the lower face. Lasers Surg Med. 2007;39(3):210–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brightman L, Weiss E, Chapas AM, Karen J, Hale E, Bernstein L, et al. Improvement in arm and post-partum abdominal and flank subcutaneous fat deposits and skin laxity using a bipolar radiofrequency, infrared, vacuum and mechanical massage device. Lasers Surg Med. 2009;41(10):791–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeHoratius DM, Dover JS. Nonablative tissue remodeling and photorejuvenation. Clin Dermatol. 2007;25(5):474–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dierickx CC. Lasers, light and radiofrequency for treatment of acne. Med Laser Appl. 2004;19(4):196–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dover JS, Zelickson B. 14-physician multispecialty consensus panel. Results of a survey of 5,700 patient monopolar radiofrequency facial skin tightening treatments: assessment of a low-energy multiple-pass technique leading to a clinical end point algorithm. Dermatol Surg Off Publ Am Soc Dermatol Surg Al. 2007;33(8):900–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El-Domyati M, El-Ammawi TS, Medhat W, Moawad O, Brennan D, Mahoney MG, et al. Radiofrequency facial rejuvenation: evidence-based effect. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;64(3):524–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elsaie M. Cutaneous remodeling and photorejuvenation using radiofrequency devices. Indian J Dermatol. 2009;54(3):201.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick R, Geronemus R, Goldberg D, Kaminer M, Kilmer S, Ruiz-Esparza J. Multicenter study of noninvasive radiofrequency for periorbital tissue tightening. Lasers Surg Med. 2003;33(4):232–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DJ. Nonablative laser technology radiofrequency. Aesth Surg J Am Soc Aesth Plast Surg. 2004;24(2):180–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DJ, Fazeli A, Berlin AL. Clinical, laboratory, and MRI analysis of cellulite treatment with a unipolar radiofrequency device. Dermatol Surg Off Publ Am Soc Dermatol Surg Al. 2008;34(2):204–9; discussion 209.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gratieri T, Alberti I, Lapteva M, Kalia YN. Next generation intra- and transdermal therapeutic systems: using non- and minimally-invasive technologies to increase drug delivery into and across the skin. Eur J Pharm Sci Off J Eur Fed Pharm Sci. 2013;50(5):609–22.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson DJ. Clinical applications of radiofrequency: nonsurgical skin tightening (thermage). Clin Plast Surg. 2009;36(2):261–8, viii.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob CI, Kaminer MS. Skin tightening with radiofrequency, Chapter 3. In: Goldberg DJ, editor. Laser and lights. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2008. p. 42–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Javate RM, Cruz RT, Khan J, Trakos N, Gordon RE. Nonablative 4-MHz dual radiofrequency wand rejuvenation treatment for periorbital rhytides and midface laxity. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;27(3):180–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lanigan SW. Lasers in dermatology. Med Laser Appl. 2008;23(2):51–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meshkinpour A, Ghasri P, Pope K, Lyubovitsky JG, Risteli J, Krasieva TB, et al. Treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids with a radiofrequency device: a study of collagen effects. Lasers Surg Med. 2005;37(5):343–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mulholland RS. Radiofrequency energy for non-invasive and minimally invasive skin tightening. Clin Plast Surg. 2011;38(3):437–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orringer JS, Voorhees JJ, Hamilton T, Hammerberg C, Kang S, Johnson TM, et al. Dermal matrix remodeling after nonablative laser therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;53(5):775–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osório N, Torezan LA. Capítulo 13- Radiofrequência e outras tecnologias para flacidez. In: Autores: Nuno Osório, Ane Niwa. Laser e Dermatologia: Conceitos Básicos e Aplicações. 2a edição. Roca; 2009. p. 150–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy BY, Hantash BM. Emerging technologies in aesthetic medicine. Dermatol Clin. 2009;27(4):521–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera AE. Acne scarring: a review and current treatment modalities. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;59(4):659–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Royo de la Torre J, Moreno-Moraga J, Muñoz E, Cornejo Navarro P. Multisource, phase-controlled radiofrequency for treatment of skin laxity: correlation between clinical and in-vivo confocal microscopy results and real-time thermal changes. J Clin Aesthetic Dermatol. 2011;4(1):28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadick N. Bipolar radiofrequency for facial rejuvenation. Facial Plast Surg Clin N Am. 2007;15(2):161–7. v.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadick NS, Karcher C, Palmisano L. Cosmetic dermatology of the aging face. Clin Dermatol. 2009;27(3):S3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki G, Tucker B, Gaston M. Clinical parameters for predicting efficacy and safety with nonablative monopolar radiofrequency treatments to the forehead, face, and neck. Aesth Surg J Am Soc Aesth Plast Surg. 2007;27(4):376–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Site Thermage: important safety information [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 29]. Available from: http://www.thermage.com/isi-consumer

  • Spandau D, Loesch M, Somani A-K, Kingsley M, Travers J. Skin resurfacing procedures: new and emerging options. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2014;7:231–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner D, Addor F. 22. Outras tecnologias – 22.1 Radiofrequência. In: Autoras: Célia Luiza Petersen Vitello Kalil, Flávia Pereira Reginatto. Envelhecimento Cutâneo. 1a edição. AC Farmacêutica; 2014. p. 204–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramony JA. Needle free parenteral drug delivery: leveraging active transdermal technologies for pediatric use. Int J Pharm. 2013;455(1–2):14–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suh DH, Lee SJ, Ryou JH, Son HC, Kim HJ, Kim HS. Monopolar radiofrequency treatment in Asian skin: do multiple RF treatments over time have beneficial effects? An observational report with long-term follow-up in eight patients. Dermatol Surg Off Publ Am Soc Dermatol Surg Al. 2013;39(4):670–2.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sukal SA, Geronemus RG. Thermage: the nonablative radiofrequency for rejuvenation. Clin Dermatol. 2008;26(6):602–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taub AF, Garretson CB. Treatment of acne scars of skin types II to V by sublative fractional bipolar radiofrequency and bipolar radiofrequency combined with diode laser. J Clin Aesthetic Dermatol. 2011;4(10):18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelickson BD, Kist D, Bernstein E, Brown DB, Ksenzenko S, Burns J, et al. Histological and ultrastructural evaluation of the effects of a radiofrequency-based nonablative dermal remodeling device: a pilot study. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140(2):204–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Célia Luiza Petersen Vitello Kalil .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Petersen Vitello Kalil, C.L., Prieto Herman Reinehr, C., Esteves, C.A.R. (2018). Non-ablative Radiofrequency for Facial Rejuvenation. In: Issa, M., Tamura, B. (eds) Lasers, Lights and Other Technologies. Clinical Approaches and Procedures in Cosmetic Dermatology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16799-2_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16799-2_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16798-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16799-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics