Skip to main content

Dyadic Coping Inventory

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy

Name and Type of Measure

The Dyadic Coping Inventory is a self-report questionnaire that measures stress management in couples.

Synonyms

DCI

Introduction

The Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI*) is a widely used (Falconier et al. 2016) self-report questionnaire developed by Bodenmann (2008) to assess partners’ stress expression and dyadic coping behaviors as conceptualized in the Systemic-Transactional Model (STM; Bodenmann 1995, 2005). According to the STM, dyadic coping is viewed as a stress management process within the couple, which goes above and beyond social support received from others, where the communication of one partner’s stress, supportive dyadic coping, delegated dyadic coping, negative dyadic coping, and common or joint dyadic coping are differentiated.

Supportive dyadic copingincludes behaviors such as showing empathy and understanding, showing solidarity with the partner, helping the partner to reframe the situation, helping the partner to calm down, helping the partner...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bodenmann, G. (1995). A systemic-transactional view of stress and coping in couples. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 54, 34–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodenmann, G. (2005). Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In T. Revenson, K. Kayser, & G. Bodenmann (eds.), Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 33–50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bodenmann, G. (2008). Dyadisches Coping Inventar: Testmanual. [Dyadic coping inventory]. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodenmann, G., & Cina, A. (2006). Stress and coping among stable-satisfied, stable-distressed and separated/divorced Swiss couples: A 5-year prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 44, 71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodenmann, G., Meuwly, N., & Kayser, K. (2011). Two conceptualizations of dyadic coping and their potential for predicting relationship quality and individual well-being. European Psychologist, 16, 255–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donato, S., Iafrate, R., Barni, D., Bertoni, A., Bodenmann, G., & Gagliardi, S. (2009). Measuring dyadic coping: The factorial structure of Bodenmann’s “Dyadic Coping Questionnaire” in an Italian sample. TPM-Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 16, 25–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconier, M. K., Nussbeck, F., & Bodenmann, G. (2013). Dyadic coping in Latino couples: Validity of the Spanish version of the dyadic coping inventory. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 26, 447–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falconier, M. K., Jackson, J., Hilpert, J., & Bodenmann, G. (2015). Dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 42, 28–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falconier, M., Randall, A., & Bodenmann, G. (2016). Couples coping with stress – A cultural perspective. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg, P. Y. (2013). Coping in relationships: The interplay between individual and dyadic coping. Axiety, Stress, & Coping: An International Journal, 26, 136–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledermann, T., Bodenmann, G., Gagliardi, S., Charvoz, L., Verardi, S., Rossier, J., Bertni, A., & Iafrate, R. (2010). Psychometrics of the dyadic coping inventory in three language groups. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 69, 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levesque, C., Lafontaine, M.-F., Caron, A., & Fitzpatrick, J. (2014). Validation of the English version of the dyadic coping inventory. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47, 215–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martos, T., Sallay, V., Nistor, M., & Jozsa, P. (2012). Dyadic coping and well-being – the Hungarian version of the dyadic coping inventory. Psychiatria Hungarica: A Magyar Pszichiatriai Tarsasag Tudomanyos Folyoirata, 27(6), 446–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meuwly, N., Feinstein, B. A., Davila, J., Nunez, D. G., & Bodenmann, G. (2013). Relationship quality among Swiss women in opposite-sex versus same-sex romantic relationships. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 72, 229–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbeck, F. N. & Jackson, J. B. (2016). Measuring Dyadic Coping Across Cultures. In M. K. Falconier, A. K. Randall, & G. Bodenmann (eds.), Couples Coping with Stress. A Cross-cultural Perspective (pp. 36–53). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papp, L. M., & Witt, N. L. (2010). Romantic partners’ individual coping strategies and dyadic coping: Implications for relationship functioning. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 551–559.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Randall, A. K., Hilpert, P., Jimenez-Arista, L. E., Walsh, K. J., & Bodenmann, G. (2016). Dyadic coping in the U.S.: Psychometric properties and validity for use of the English version of the dyadic coping inventory. Current Psychology, 35, 570–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall, A. K., Totenhagen, C. J., Walsh, K. J., Adams, C. B., & Tao, C. (2017). Coping with workplace minority stress: Associations between dyadic coping and anxiety among women in same-sex relationships. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 21, 70–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rottmann, N., Hansen, D. G., Larsen, P. V., Nicolaisen, A., Flyger, H., Johansen, C., & Hagedoorn, M. (2015). Dyadic coping within couples dealing with breast cancer: A longitudinal, population-based study. Health Psychology., 34, 486. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruffieux, M., Nussbeck, F. N., & Bodenmann, G. (2014). Long-term prediction of relationship satisfaction and stability by stress, coping, communication, and well-being. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 55, 485–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusu, P., Hilpert, P., & Bodenmann, G. (2016). Dyadic coping in an eastern European context: Validity and measurement invariance of the Romanian version of dyadic coping inventory. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development., 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175616664009

  • Vedes, A., Nussbeck, F. W., Bodenmann, G., Lind, W., & Ferreira, A. (2013). Psychometric properties and validity of the dyadic coping inventory in Portuguese. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 72(3), 149–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, F., Hilpert, P., Randall, A. K., Li, Q., & Bodenmann, G. (2016). Validation of the dyadic coping inventory with Chinese couples: Factorial structure, measurement invariance, and construct validity. Psychological Assessment. Advanced online publication, 28, e127. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Jimenez Arista .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Bodenmann, G., Arista, L.J., Walsh, K.J., Randall, A.K. (2018). Dyadic Coping Inventory. In: Lebow, J., Chambers, A., Breunlin, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15877-8_678-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15877-8_678-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15877-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15877-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics