Skip to main content

FACES IV

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barber, B. K., & Buehler, C. (1996). Family cohesion and enmeshment: Different constructs, different effects. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 433–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craddock, A. E. (2001). Relationships between family structure and family functioning: A test of Tiesel and Olson’s revision of the circumplex model. Journal of Family Studies, 7, 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, W. J., & Hovander, D. (1990). Why don’t family measures of cohesion and control behave the way they‘re supposed to? The American Journal of Family Therapy, 18, 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, C., Streeter, C. L., & Springer, D. W. (2001). Validity of the FACES IV family assessment measure. Research on Social Work Practice, 5, 576–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorall, D. M. (2002). FACES IV and the circumplex model of marital and family systems (Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan). Dissertation Abstracts, 63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouneski, E. (2002). Circumplex model and FACES: Review of literature. Available online at: www.faces.IV.com

  • Olson, D. H. (2000). Circumplex model of family system. Journal of Family Therapy, 22(2), 144–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H. (2008). FACES IV manual. Roseville: PREPARE-ENRICH, LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H. (2011). FACES IV and the circumplex model: Validity study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 3(1), 64–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H., Sprenkle, D. H., & Russell, C. (1979). Circumplex model of marital and family systems: I. Cohesion and adaptability dimensions, family types, and clinical applications. Family Process, 18, 3–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perosa, L., & Perosa, S. (1990). The use of a bipolar item format for FACES IV: A reconsideration. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 16, 187–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, D. M., & Hansen, J. C. (1987). A test of the curvilinear hypothesis with FACES II and III. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 13, 387–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, V., & Lewis, R. A. (1999). Observational couple assessment. A cross-model comparison. Journal of Family Therapy, 21, 78–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, V., & Olson, D. H. (1993). Problem families and the circumplex model: Observational assessment using the clinical rating scale (CRS). Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 19, 159–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiesel, J. W. (1994). Capturing family dynamics: The reliability and validity of FACES IV (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1994). Dissertation Abstracts International, 55 , 3006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Olson, D.H. (2018). FACES IV. In: Lebow, J., Chambers, A., Breunlin, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15877-8_394-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15877-8_394-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15877-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15877-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics