Skip to main content

Ledgers in Couple and Family Therapy

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy

Name of Concept

Ledger in couple and family therapy

Introduction

Interpersonal relationships are dynamic interactions existing between individuals inside a broader system. Within relationships, individuals engage in explicit and implicit giving, receiving, and taking. The relationship ledger is an invisible interpersonal balance of entitlements (i.e., what one is owed or earned) and indebtedness (i.e., what one owes another) that is overtly and covertly maintained by both members of a dyad and multiple members of a family system.

Theoretical Context for Concept

Development of the interpersonal ledger was influenced by existential philosophy, object relations theory, and contextual family therapy focusing on the impact of multigenerational (i.e., three generations) familial connections on present relationships. Relational “health” is achieved when individuals perceive symmetry (i.e., equitable balance in the ledger) within the relationship, or can notice asymmetryand engage in...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, J. F., & Maynard, P. E. (2004). Contextual therapy: Applying the family ledger to couple therapy. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1300/J39v03n01_01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boszormenyi-Nagy, I. (1987). Foundations of contextual therapy: Collected papers of Ivan Boszormenyi-Nagy, M.D. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boszormenyi-Nagy, I., & Krasner, B. R. (1986). Between give and take: A clinical guide to contextual therapy. New York: Brunner-Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boszormenyi-Nagy, I., Grunebaum, J., & Ulrich, D. (1991). Contextual therapy. In: A. S. Gurman & D. P. Kniskern (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy (vol. 2, pp. 200–238). New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boszormenyi-Nagy, I., & Spark, G. M. (2013). Invisible loyalties. New York: Routledge. (Original work published in 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. C., Garber, J., Muto, M., & Schneider, K. A. (1999). Case report – Loyalty, legacy, and ledger: Contextual therapy in a patient with a family history of ovarian cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 8(6), 359–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1989). Martin Buber and Ivan Boszormenyi-Nagy: The role of dialogue in contextual therapy. Psychotherapy, 26(3), 402–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1998). Buber’s philosophy as the basis for dialogical psychotherapy and contextual therapy. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 38, 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221678980381004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Goff, J. F. (2001). Boszormenyi-Nagy and contextual therapy: An overview. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 22(3), 147–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica R. M. Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Liu, J.R.M. (2017). Ledgers in Couple and Family Therapy. In: Lebow, J., Chambers, A., Breunlin, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15877-8_354-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15877-8_354-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15877-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15877-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics