Skip to main content

Psychodynamic Couple Therapy

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 550 Accesses

Name of Intervention

Psychodynamic couple therapy

Introduction

This essay reviews what I believe are the most important psychodynamic contributions to the field of couple therapy. It is a whirlwind tour condensing material covered in six chapters and more than 100 pages in my earlier book (Nielsen 2016), which, itself, distills the work of many clinicians and researchers. I will discuss four central psychoanalytic domains – underlying issues, divergent subjective experiences, transference hopes and fears, and self and partner acceptance – and apply them to couple problems and therapy. The additional, important, topic of projective identification as applied to couple therapy is covered in a separate article in this encyclopedia.

Specific schools of psychoanalysis – modern ego psychology, object relations theory, self-psychology, relational psychoanalysis, mentalization, or attachment-based treatment – have genuine differences and emphases, but this essay is not an exercise in compare...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Bergler, E. (1949). Conflict in marriage: The unhappy undivorced. Madison: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, D. A. (1999). Reversing the negative cycle: Interpreting the mutual influence of adaptive, self-protective measures in the couple. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 68, 559–583.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Catherall, D. (1992). Working with projective identification in couples. Family Process, 31, 355–367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, A., & Jacobson, N. S. (1998). Acceptance and change in couple therapy: A therapist’s guide to transforming relationships. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicks, H. (1967). Marital tensions. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, J. M. (2003). Short-term object relations couples therapy. New York: Brunner-Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, M.-J. (2010). The embedded self: An integrative psychodynamic and systemic perspective on couples and family therapy (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M., & Gottman, J. S. (2010). Gottman method couple therapy. In A. S. Gurman (Ed.), Clinical handbook of couple therapy (4th ed., pp. 138–164). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, L. S., & Goldman, R. N. (2008). Emotion-focused couples therapy: The dynamics of emotion, love, and power. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, L. S., & Johnson, S. M. (1988). Emotionally focused therapy for couples. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurman, A. S. (2008). Integrative couple therapy: A depth psychological approach. In A. S. Gurman (Ed.), Clinical handbook of couple therapy (4th ed., pp. 383–423). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazlett, P. S. (2010). Attunement, disruption, and repair: The dance of self and other in emotionally focused couple therapy. In A. S. Gurman (Ed.), Clinical casebook of couple therapy (4th ed., pp. 21–43). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. M. (1996). The practice of emotionally focused marital therapy. Florence: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. M. (2008). Emotionally focused couple therapy. In A. S. Gurman (Ed.), Clinical handbook of couple therapy (4th ed., pp. 107–137). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leone, C. (2008). Couple therapy from the perspective of self psychology and intersubjectivity theory. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 25, 79–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, M. S. (1995). A self psychologist in Couplesland: Multisubjective approach to transference and countertransference-like phenomena in marital relationships. Family Process, 34, 427–439.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Middleberg, C. V. (2001). Projective identification in common couple dances. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 27, 341–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, A. C. (2016). A roadmap for couple therapy: Integrating systemic, psychodynamic, and behavioral approaches. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. W., & Auchincloss, E. L. (2006). Psychoanalysis in textbooks of introductory psychology: A review. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 54, 1361–1380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Real, T. (2007). The new rules of marriage. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringstrom, P. A. (1994). An intersubjective approach to conjoint therapy. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Progress in self psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 159–182). Hillsdale: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringstrom, P. A. (2014). A relational psychoanalytic approach to couples psychotherapy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sager, C. J. (1994). Marriage contracts and couple therapy: Hidden forces in intimate relationships. Northvale: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarf, M. (1987). Intimate partners: Patterns in love and marriage. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharff, J. S., & Scharff, D. E. (2008). Object relations couple therapy. In A. S. Gurman (Ed.), Clinical handbook of couple therapy (4th ed., pp. 167–195). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheinkman, M. (2008). The multi-level approach: A road map for couples therapy. Family Process, 47, 197–213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scheinkman, M., & Fishbane, M. (2004). The vulnerability cycle: Working with impasses in couple therapy. Family Process, 43, 279–299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaddock, D. (1998). From impasse to intimacy: How understanding unconscious needs can transform relationships. Northvale: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaddock, D. (2000). Contexts and connections: An intersubjective systems approach to couples therapy. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, J. P. (1992). Repairing intimacy: An object relations approach to couples therapy. New York: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, J. P. (2010). A good-enough therapy: An object relations approach. In A. S. Gurman (Ed.), Clinical casebook of couple therapy (4th ed., pp. 134–152). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slipp, S. (1988). The technique and practice of object relations family therapy. Northvale: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprenkle, D. H., Davis, S. D., & Lebow, J. L. (2009). Common factors in couple and family therapy: The overlooked foundation for effective practice. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, S. (1994). Needed relationships and repeated relationships: An integrated relational perspective. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 4, 317–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D. B. (2006). Opening what has been closed, relaxing what has been clenched: Dissociation and enactment over time in committed relationships. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 16, 747–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolorow, R., Brandshaft, B., & Atwood, G. (1987). Psychoanalytic treatment: An intersubjective approach. Hillsdale: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachtel, P. L. (2014). Cyclical psychodynamics and the contextual self: The inner world, the intimate world, and the world of culture and society. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachtel, E. F., & Wachtel, P. L. (1986). Family dynamics in individual psychotherapy: A guide to clinical strategies. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingarten, K. (1991). The discourses of intimacy: Adding a social constructionist and feminist view. Family Process, 30, 285–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Westen, D. (1999). The scientific status of unconscious processes: Is Freud really dead? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 47, 1061–1106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wile, D. B. (1981). Couples therapy: A nontraditional approach. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wile, D. B. (1993). After the fight: Using your disagreements to build a stronger relationship. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wile, D. B. (2002). Collaborative couple therapy. In A. S. Gurman & N. S. Jacobson (Eds.), Clinical handbook of couple therapy (3rd ed., pp. 281–307). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wile, D. B. (2013). Opening the circle of pursuit and distance. Family Process, 52, 19–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Willi, J. (1984). The concept of collusion: A theoretical framework for marital therapy. Family Process, 23, 177–186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zeitner, R. M. (2012). Self within marriage: The foundation for lasting relationships. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinner, J. (1989). The implications of projective identification for marital interaction. In J. Scharff (Ed.), Foundations of object relations family therapy (pp. 155–174). Northvale: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arthur C. Nielsen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Nielsen, A.C. (2017). Psychodynamic Couple Therapy. In: Lebow, J., Chambers, A., Breunlin, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15877-8_19-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15877-8_19-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15877-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15877-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics