Advertisement

Time Series Analysis in Biomechanics

  • W. Brent Edwards
  • Timothy R. Derrick
  • Joseph Hamill
Reference work entry

Abstract

The quantification of human motion is based on the conversion of a continuous biomechanical signal to a discrete sampling of data points that vary with time known as a time series. This process enables the biomechanical signal to be stored digitally, subsequently allowing the various time series to be further processed. The goal of a biomechanical analysis is straightforward but the theory and techniques for obtaining accurate and meaningful data are often not. For example, if the biomechanical signal varies with time, how often do we need to sample it to prevent missing information? How can we insure that the sampled or digital signal accurately reflects the original biomechanical signal? Can we improve this accuracy after the signal has been digitized? Can we decompose the signal into constituent parts and examine these parts independently? Can we remove unwanted and distracting parts while retaining the vital information contained in the data? This chapter will cover the basic requirements to collect valid data free from sources of error and noise and some of the common processing and analysis techniques used for decomposing, rejecting, and recomposing the biomechanical signal.

Keywords

Signal Cross-correlation Autocorrelation Sampling theory Frequency Fourier transform Nyquist rate Nyquist Frequency Numerical differentiation Numerical integration First central difference method Trapezoid rule Noise Smoothing Filter Joint time frequency analysis Short term Fourier transform Wavelet transform Continuous wavelet transform Discrete wavelet transform 

References

  1. Bisseling RW, Hof AL (2006) Handling of impact forces in inverse dynamics. J Biomech 39:2438–2444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Challis JH (1999) A procedure for the automatic determination of filter cutoff frequency for the processing of biomechanical data. J Appl Biomech 15:303–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Delp, S. L., Anderson, F. C., Arnold, A. S., Loan, P., Habib, A., John, C. T., ..., & Thelen, D. G. (2007). OpenSim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 54, 1940–1950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Edwards WB, Troy KL, Derrick TR (2011) On the filtering of intersegmental loads during running. Gait Posture 34:435–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jackson KM (1979) Fitting of mathematical functions to biomechanical data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 26:122–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kristianslund E, Krosshaug T, van den Bogert AJ (2012) Effect of low pass filtering on joint moments from inverse dynamics: implications for injury prevention. J Biomech 45:666–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. van den Bogert AJ, Blana D, Heinrich D (2011) Implicit methods for efficient musculoskeletal simulation and optimal control. Procedia IUTAM 2:297–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Winter DA (1990) Biomechanics and motor control of human movement, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, TorontoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Brent Edwards
    • 1
  • Timothy R. Derrick
    • 2
  • Joseph Hamill
    • 3
  1. 1.Human Performance Laboratory, Faculty of KinesiologyUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  2. 2.Department of KinesiologyIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  3. 3.Department of KinesiologyUniversity of MassachusettsAmherstUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • William Scott Selbie
    • 1
  1. 1.Has-Motion Inc.KingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations