Encyclopedia of Bioastronautics

Living Edition
| Editors: Laurence R. Young, Jeffrey P. Sutton

Behavioral Challenges of Space Exploration

  • Jack W. Stuster
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10152-1_34-2

Definition

Behavioral Challenges of Space Exploration refers to the factors that either contribute to or impede successful and sustained adjustment to the conditions. Those conditions include, but are not limited to, isolation and confinement; constant proximity of other personnel; restricted choices; absence of gravity; hostile outside environment; and, risk of death from imperfect planning, equipment failure, human error, or a catastrophic event, such as a micrometeoroid strike or solar radiation exposure.

Introduction

The history of exploration contains many examples of serious psychological problems in response to the isolation, confinement, and other stressors of expedition life. Accounts of Adolphus Greely’s disastrous Lady Franklin Bay Expedition , from which only 6 of 25 returned in 1884, affected all subsequent polar explorers. The stories of insanity and cannibalism among the Greely party were known by the members of the Belgian Antarctic Expedition 13 years later when they...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Barger LK, Flynn-Evans EE, Kubey A, Walsh L, Ronda JM, Wang W, Wright KP Jr, Czeisler CA (2014) Prevalence of sleep deficiency and use of hypnotic drugs in astronauts before, during, and after spaceflight: an observational study. Lancet Neurol. August 8; epubGoogle Scholar
  2. Basner M, Dinges DF, Mollicone DJ, Ecker AJ, Jones CW, Hyder EC, Di Antonio A, Savelev IE, Kan K, Goel N, Morukov BV, Sutton JP (2013) Mars 520-day mission simulation reveals protracted crew hypokinesis and alterations of sleep duration and timing. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(7):2635–2640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Basner M, Dinges DF, Mollicone DJ, Ecker AJ, Jones CW, Hyder Di Antonio A, Savelev I E, Kan K, Goel, N, Morukov, B.V., Sutton, J.P. (2014) Psychological and behavioral changes during confinement in a 520-day simulated interplanetary mission to Mars. PLoS ONE 9(3): e93298. https://doi.org/10.1371Google Scholar
  4. Brady JV (1992) Continuously programmed environments and the experimental analysis of human behavior. Cambridge Center For Behavioral Studies, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  5. Cavanagh PR, Genc KO, Gopalakrishnan R, Kuklis MM, Maender CC, Rice AJ (2010) Foot forces during typical days on the international space station. J Biomech 43:2182–2188.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.03.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiao L, Salazan S, Sargsyan AE, Melton S, Hamilton DR, McFarlin K, Dulchavsky SA (2005) Ocular examination for trauma: clinical ultrasound aboard the ISS. J Trauma 58(5):885–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Connors MM, Harrison A, Akins FR (1985) Living aloft: human requirements for extended spaceflight. (NASA SP-483), National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  8. Cousteau J-Y (1966) Working for weeks on the sea floor. Natl Geogr 129(4):498–537Google Scholar
  9. Dick SJ, Cowing K (eds) (2005) Risk and exploration: Earth, Sea, and the Stars. NASA History Division (NASA SP-2005-4701), Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  10. Foale CM, Kaleri AY, Sargsyan AE, Sargsyan AE, Hamilton DR, Melton SL, Martin DS, Dulchavsky SA (2005) Diagnostic instrumentation aboard ISS: just in time training for non-physician crewmembers. Aviat Space Environ Med 76:594–598Google Scholar
  11. Genc KO, Humphreys BT, Cavanagh P (2009) Enhanced daily load stimulus to bone in spaceflight and on Earth. Aviat Space Environ Med 80:919–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gunderson EKE (1966) Adaptation to extreme environments: prediction of performance. Navy Neuropsychiatric Research Unit. Unit Report No. 66–17, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  13. Gunderson EKE, Nelson PD (1963) Adaptation of small groups to extreme environments. Aerosp Med 34:1111–1115Google Scholar
  14. Gunderson EKE (1968) Psychiatric problems in polar environments. Navy Medical Neuropsychiatric Research Unit, San Diego. Unit Report No. 68-4Google Scholar
  15. Gunderson EKE (1973) Psychological studies in Antarctica: a review. In: Edholm OG, Gunderson EKE (eds) Polar human biology. pp 352–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kanas N (1990) Psychological, psychiatric, and interpersonal aspects of long-duration space missions. J Spacecraft 27:457–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kanas N (2012) Human interactions on-orbit. Space technology library, Springer, SPTL vol 29, 2013: 93–106, 21Google Scholar
  18. Kanas N, Federson WE (1971) Behavioral, psychiatric, and sociological problems of long-duration space missions. NASA TM X-58067, HoustonGoogle Scholar
  19. Kanas N, Salnitskiy V, Boyd J, Gushin V, Weiss D, Saylor S, Kozerenko O, Marmar C (2007) Crewmember and mission control personnel interactions during International Space Station missions. Aviat Space Environ Med 78:601–607Google Scholar
  20. Kanas N, Salnitskiy V, Grund EM, Weiss DS, Gushin V, Bostrom A, Kozerenko O, Sled A, Marmar CR (2001) Psychological issues in space: results from Shuttle/Mir. Gravit Space Biol Bull 14(2):35–45Google Scholar
  21. Nansen F (1897) Farthest north, 2 vols. Harper & Brothers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Nelson PD (1962) Leadership in small isolated groups. Navy Medical Neuropsychiatric Research Unit, San Diego. Unit Report No. 62-13Google Scholar
  23. Nelson P (1965) Psychological aspects of Antarctic living. US Navy Neuropsychiatric Research Unit. Unit Report No. 64–28, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  24. Nelson PD (1973) Indirect observation of groups. In: Rasmussen JE (ed) Man in isolation and confinement. Aldine Publishing Company, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  25. Palinkas LA (1987) Antarctica as a model for the human exploration of Mars. Naval Health Research Center Report No. 87-24, San DiegoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Palinkas LA (1992) Going to extremes: the cultural context of stress, illness and coping in Antarctica. Soc Sci Med 35:651–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Palinkas LA (2001) Psychosocial issues in long-term space flight: Overview. Gravit Space Biol Bull 14(2):25–33Google Scholar
  28. Radloff R, Helmreich R (1968) Groups under stress: psychological research in Sealab II. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Ryumin, V (1980) 175 days in space: a Russian cosmonaut’s private diary (trans: Gris H (ed)). Unpublished manuscriptGoogle Scholar
  30. Sells SB (1973) The taxonomy of man in enclosed space. In: Rasmussen JE (ed) Man in isolation and confinement. Aldine Publishing Company, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  31. Spence JT, Helmreich R (1978) Masculinity and femininity: their psychological dimensions, correlates and antecedents. University of Texas Press, AustinGoogle Scholar
  32. Stuster, J (1986) Space station habitability recommendations based on a systematic somparative analysis of analogous conditions. NASA Contractor Report 3943, Ames Research CenterGoogle Scholar
  33. Stuster J (1996) Bold endeavors: lessons from polar and space exploration. Naval Institute Press, AnnapolisGoogle Scholar
  34. Stuster J, Bachelard C, Suedfeld P (2000) The relative importance of behavioral issues during long-duration I.C.E. missions. Aviat Space Environ Med 71(9):A17–A25Google Scholar
  35. Stuster J (2010a) Acceptable risk: the human mission to Mars. J Cosmol 12:3566–3577Google Scholar
  36. Stuster J (2010b) Behavioral issues associated with isolation and confinement: review and analysis of astronaut journals. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. NASA/TM-2010-216130 (July). Houston: Johnson Space CenterGoogle Scholar
  37. Stuster J (2016) Behavioral issues associated with isolation and confinement: Review and Analysis of Astronaut Journals, phase 2 final report. NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston. NASA/TM-2016-218603Google Scholar
  38. Suedfeld P, Steel GD (2000) The environmental psychology of capsule habitats. Annu Rev Psychol 51:227–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Taylor AJW (1978) Antarctica psychometrica unspectacular. N Z Antarct Rec 6:36–45Google Scholar
  40. Ushakov IB, Morukov BV, Bubeev YA, Gushin VI, Yu G, Vasil’eva AGV, Shved DM (2014) Main findings of psychophysical studies in the Mars 500 experiment. Her Russ Acad Sci 84(2):106–114. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. Original Russian Text published in Vestnik Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk 84(3):212–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Anacapa Sciences, IncSanta BarbaraUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • David F. Dinges
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaUSA