Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Visiting a Coloproctology Patient: Rules and Suggestions

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Colon, Rectum and Anus: Anatomic, Physiologic and Diagnostic Bases for Disease Management

Part of the book series: Coloproctology ((COLOPROCT,volume 1))

  • 2026 Accesses

Abstract

A careful clinical examination remains of crucial importance in a patient affected by coloproctological diseases. These conditions have a significant impact on the patients’ quality of life and, moreover, are often associated to personality disorders or real psychiatric conditions: some measures are therefore needed to minimize the impact of the visit and to establish immediately an effective relationship of mutual trust.

It is therefore clear that the choice of where and how to visit a coloproctology patient is very important to properly address the diagnostic-therapeutic approach. A full coloproctologic examination should always provide a series of well-defined phases, with the evaluation of several different aspects of the same disease. For many common diseases treated in a proctology clinic, a proper clinical examination can address, or not, the patient to a subsequent assessment by radiology or anorectal physiology testing.

Growing literature evidences support the surgeon in the diagnosis of colorectal diseases and have highlighted the importance of treating these conditions in a specialist colorectal context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 279.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Becker A, Koltun L, Sayfan J (2006) Simple clinical examination predicts complexity of perianal fistula. Colorectal Dis 8:601–604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cirocco WC, Reilly JC (1992) Challenging the predictive accuracy of Goodsall’s rule for anal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 35:537–542

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coremans G, Dockx S, Wyndaele J, Hendrickx A (2003) Do anal fistulas in Crohn’s disease behave differently and defy Goodsall’s rule more frequently than fistulas that are cryptoglandular in origin? Am J Gastroenterol 98:2732–2735

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande AR, Block N, Barkin JS (2009) Taking a closer look at the rectal examination: beyond the basics. Am J Gastroenterol 104:246–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbene AC, Terra MP, Deutekom M, Gerhards MF, Bijnen AB, Felt-Bersma RJ, Janssen LW, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J (2007) Anal inspection and digital rectal examination compared to anorectal physiology tests and endoanal ultrasonography in evaluating fecal incontinence. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:783–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckardt VF, Kanzler G (1993) How reliable is digital examination for the evaluation of anal sphincter tone? Int J Colorectal Dis 8:95–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gans SL, Pols MA, Stoker J, Boermeester MA (2015) Guideline for the diagnostic pathway in patients with acute abdominal pain. Dig Surg 32:23–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Aguilar J, Belmonte C, Wong WD, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD (1996) Anal fistula surgery. Factors associated with recurrence and incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 39:723–729

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GarcĂ­a-Olmo D, Pascual Migueláñez I (2010) A sonograph in the proctology clinic – an aid to the “learned finger”. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 102:1–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gebbensleben O, Hilger Y, Rohde H (2009) Patients’ views of medical positioning for proctologic examination. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2:133–138

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein ET (1996) Outcomes of anorectal disease in a health maintenance organization setting. The need for colorectal surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 39:1193–1198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grucela A, Salinas H, Khaitov S, Steinhagen RM, Gorfine SR, Chessin DB (2010) Prospective analysis of clinician accuracy in the diagnosis of benign anal pathology: comparison across specialties and years of experience. Dis Colon Rectum 53:47–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gunawardhana PA, Deen KI (2001) Comparison of hydrogen peroxide instillation with Goodsall’s rule for fistula-in-ano. ANZ J Surg 71:472–474

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hyman NH (1999) Impact of a colon and rectal surgeon on a general surgery residency training program. Dis Colon Rectum 42:249–251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Isherwood J, Ashkir Z, Panteleimonitis S, Kumar N, Hemingway D, Miller AS, Norwood MN, Yeung JM (2013) Teaching digital rectal examination to medical students using a structured workshop-a point in the right direction? J Surg Educ 70:254–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jimeno J, VallverdĂş H, Tubella J, Sánchez-Pradell C, Comajuncosas J, Orbeal R, Hermoso J, Gris P, LĂłpez-Negre JL, UrgellĂ©s J, ParĂ©s D (2012) Prospective analysis of clinician accuracy in the diagnosis of benign anorectal pathology: the value of clinical information. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 104:122–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones OM, Ramalingam T, Lindsey I, Cunningham C, George BD, Mortensen NJ (2005) Digital rectal examination of sphincter pressures in chronic anal fissure is unreliable. Dis Colon Rectum 48:349–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jordán J, Roig JV, GarcĂ­a-Armengol J, GarcĂ­a-Granero E, Solana A, LledĂł S (2010) Risk factors for recurrence and incontinence after anal fistula surgery. Colorectal Dis 12:254–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karlbom U, Graf W, Nilsson S, PĂĄhlman L (2004) The accuracy of clinical examination in the diagnosis of rectal intussusception. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1533–1538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kashyap AS, Kohli DR, Raizon A, Olden KW (2013) A prospective study evaluating emotional disturbance in subjects undergoing defecating proctography. World J Gastroenterol 19:3990–3995

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kuehn HG, Gebbensleben O, Hilger Y, Rohde H (2009) Relationship between anal symptoms and anal findings. Int J Med Sci 6:77–84

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Laurell H, Hansson LE, Gunnarsson U (2006) Why do surgeons miss malignancies in patients with acute abdominal pain? Anticancer Res 26:3675–3678

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Longo WE (2003) The specialty of colon and rectal surgery: its impact on patient care and role in academic medicine. Yale J Biol Med 76:63–77

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Maconi G, Gridavilla D, Viganò C, Sciurti R, Asthana AK, Furfaro F, Re F, Ardizzone S, Ba G (2014) Perianal disease is associated with psychiatric co-morbidity in Crohn’s disease in remission. Int J Colorectal Dis 29:1285–1290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ratto C, Grillo E, Parello A, Costamagna G, Doglietto GB (2005) Endoanal ultrasound-guided surgery for anal fistula. Endoscopy 37:722–728

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roos AM, Abdool Z, Thakar R, Sultan AH (2012) Predicting anal sphincter defects: the value of clinical examination and manometry. Int Urogynecol J 23:755–763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma A, Sharp DM, Walker LG, Monson JR (2008) Stress and burnout among colorectal surgeons and colorectal nurse specialists working in the National Health Service. Colorectal Dis 10:397–406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siproudhis L, Ropert A, Vilotte J, Bretagne JF, Heresbach D, Raoul JL, Gosselin M (1993) How accurate is clinical examination in diagnosing and quantifying pelvirectal disorders? A prospective study in a group of 50 patients complaining of defecatory difficulties. Dis Colon Rectum 36:430–438

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sit M, Yilmaz EE, Canan F, Yildirim O, Cetin MM (2014a) Health-related quality of life in patients with anal fissure: effect of type D personality. Prz Gastroenterol 9:93–98

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sit M, Yilmaz EE, Canan F, Yıldırım O, Cetin MM (2014b) The impact of type D personality on health-related quality of life in patients with symptomatic haemorrhoids. Prz Gastroenterol 9:242–248

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sprangers MA, Taal BG, Aaronson NK, teVelde A (1995) Quality of life in colorectal cancer. Stoma vs. non-stoma patients. Dis Colon Rectum 38:361–369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Springall RG, Todd IP (1988) General practitioner referral of patients with lower gastrointestinal symptoms. J R Soc Med 81:87–88

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sygut A, Mik M, Trzcinski R, Dziki A (2010) How the location of the internal opening of anal fistulas affect the treatment results of primary transsphincteric fistulas. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395:1055–1059

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Talley NJ (2008) How to do and interpret a rectal examination in gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol 103:820–822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tantiphlachiva K, Rao P, Attaluri A, Rao SS (2010) Digital rectal examination is a useful tool for identifying patients with dyssynergia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:955–960

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Toyonaga T, Tanaka Y, Song JF, Katori R, Sogawa N, Kanyama H, Hatakeyama T, Matsushima M, Suzuki S, Mibu R, Tanaka M (2008) Comparison of accuracy of physical examination and endoanal ultrasonography for preoperative assessment in patients with acute and chronic anal fistula. Tech Coloproctol 12:217–223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zbar AP (2009) David Henry Goodsall: reassessment of the rule. Tech Coloproctol 13:185–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgical Sciences, Proctology Unit, Catholic University, Rome, Italy

    Carlo Ratto, Francesco Litta, Lorenza Donisi & Angelo Parello

Authors
  1. Carlo Ratto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francesco Litta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lorenza Donisi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Angelo Parello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlo Ratto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Catholic University, Department of Surgical Sciences, Proctology Unit, Rome, Italy

    Carlo Ratto

  2. Department of Surgical Sciences, Proctology Unit, Catholic University, Rome, Italy

    Angelo Parello

  3. Department of Surgical Sciences, Proctology Unit, Catholic University, Rome, Italy

    Lorenza Donisi

  4. Department of Surgical Sciences, Proctology Unit, Catholic University, Rome, Italy

    Francesco Litta

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Ratto, C., Litta, F., Donisi, L., Parello, A. (2017). Visiting a Coloproctology Patient: Rules and Suggestions. In: Ratto, C., Parello, A., Donisi, L., Litta, F. (eds) Colon, Rectum and Anus: Anatomic, Physiologic and Diagnostic Bases for Disease Management. Coloproctology, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09807-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09807-4_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09806-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09807-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation