Skip to main content

Animal Rights

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 635 Accesses

Abstract

“Animal rights” is principally a modern, western consideration. As a Kantian concept, it assumes that general principles (rights) should be granted to animals in order to define the relationship between humans and animals. The arguments of Tom Regan and Gary Francione are based on a radical (abolitionist) approach to animal rights, but their scope is limited to the most intelligent animals (vertebrates and mammals). The Universal Declaration of Animal Rights adopted a broader approach, including all animal groups with their specific features in a biologically balanced context. A number of questions are still unanswered; the position for a gradualist view of animals and animal rights, and therefore the connection between human rights and animal rights. The Great Ape Project advocates that apes be granted certain rights traditionally reserved for humans, thus focusing attention on the need for a gradualist approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   1,799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   1,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bovet, D., & Chapouthier, G. (2013). Scientific identification and definition of degrees of sensitivity in the animal world. In T. Auffret Van Der Kemp & M. Lachance (Eds.), Animal suffering: From science to law (pp. 13–23). Toronto: Carswell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapouthier, G., & Nouet, J. C. (Eds.). (1998). The universal declaration of animal rights, comments and intentions. Paris: Publisher Ligue Francaise des Droits de l’Animal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francione, G. (1995). Animals, property and the law. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, J. M. (2012). The universal declaration of animal rights or the creation of a new equilibrium between species. Animal Law, 19(1), 91–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, T. (1983). The case for animal rights. California: University of California Press. further editions 1985, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (2003). Animal liberation at 30. The New York Review, 15, 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P., & Cavalieri, P. (Eds.). (1993). The great ape project: Equality beyond humanity. London: Fourth Estate publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Further Readings

  • Auffret Van Der Kemp, T., & Lachance, M. (Eds.). (2013). Animal suffering: From science to law. Toronto: Carswell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linzey, A. (Ed.). (2013). The global guide to animal protection. Illinois: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (1975). Animal liberation: A new ethics for our treatment of animals. New York: Review/Random House. Further editions 1976, 1977, 1983, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank Dr. Jean-Yves Goffi for his advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georges Chapouthier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Chapouthier, G. (2016). Animal Rights. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics