Abstract
This entry examines the relevance of the concept of ageism for bioethics. Ageism is defined as the display of negative attitudes or behavior toward individuals or groups based on their age, which results in age discrimination. After a brief description of the historical context, two concepts of ageism are distinguished: a general one and a more specific one. The latter concerns negative stereotypes and age discrimination of older people, which is the focus here. Following a brief outline of the ethical and legal framework of criticizing ageism, the main areas of bioethical concern are analyzed. Individual medical staffs may have negative stereotypes about older people, which could result in discrimination and disadvantages in health care. Another main area is the health-care system itself, because the public perception of older people as a burden on social services could generate repeated requests for age-based rationing, which can have ageist elements. A major field, which might benefit from population aging as well, is antiaging medicine, the representatives of which have been repeatedly accused of ageism. The exclusion of older people from participation in medical research may also partially constitute a result of ageism. Finally, the importance of countering ageism from a global health perspective is justified and highlighted in the conclusion of this entry, which may be of particular relevance for bioethics and training future medical staff in medical ethics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bernard, M. A., McAuley, W. J., Belzer, J. A., & Neal, K. S. (2003). An evaluation of a low-intensity intervention to introduce medical students to healthy older people. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 51(3), 419–423.
Butler, R. N. (1969). Age-ism: Another form of bigotry. The Gerontologist, 9(4 Part 1), 243–246.
Butler, R. N. (2005). Foreword. In E. B. Palmore, L. G. Branch & D. K. Harris (Eds.), Encyclopedia of ageism (pp. xviii, 347 p.). Binghamton: Haworth Pastoral Press/Haworth Reference Press.
Bytheway, B. (2005). Ageism. In M. L. Johnson (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of age and ageing (pp. xxvi, 744 p.). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dannefer, D., & Phillipson, C. (2010). The Sage handbook of social gerontology. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
de Beauvoir, S. (1970). La vieillesse. Paris: Gallimard.
Defanti, C. A., Tiezzi, A., Gasparini, M., Gasperini, M., Congedo, M., Tiraboschi, P.,...Palliative Care in Neurology Study Group of the Italian Society of Neurology. (2007). Ethical questions in the treatment of subjects with dementia. Part I. Respecting autonomy: Awareness, competence and behavioural disorders. Neurological Sciences, 28(4), 216–231. doi:10.1007/s10072-006-0825-x.
Fleck, L. M. (2010). Just caring: In defense of limited age-based healthcare rationing. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 19(1), 27–37. doi:10.1017/S0963180109990223.
Harris, J. (2005). It’s not NICE to discriminate. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(7), 373–375. doi:10.1136/jme.2005.012906.
Hendricks, J., & Cutler, S. J. (2005). Ethical issues. In E. B. Palmore, L. G. Branch & D. K. Harris (Eds.), Encyclopedia of ageism (pp. xviii, 347 p.). Binghamton: Haworth Pastoral Press/Haworth Reference Press.
Nordenfelt, L. (2009). Dignity in care for older people. Chichester/Ames: Wiley-Blackwell.
Palmore, E. (2005). Three decades of research on ageism. Generations, 29(3), 87–90.
Seshamani, M., & Gray, A. (2004). Time to death and health expenditure: An improved model for the impact of demographic change on health care costs. Age and Ageing, 33(6), 556–561. doi:10.1093/ageing/afh187.
Thielke, S., Sale, J., & Reid, M. C. (2012). Aging: Are these 4 pain myths complicating care? The Journal of Family Practice, 61(11), 666–670.
UN. (2014). Global issues – Ageing. Retrieved October 14, 2014, from http://www.un.org/en/globalissues/ageing
Vincent, J. A. (2006). Ageing contested: Anti-ageing science and the cultural construction of old age. Sociology, 40(4), 681–698. doi:10.1177/0038038506065154.
Further Readings
McDaniel, S. A., & Zimmer, Z. (2013). Global ageing in the twenty-first century: Challenges, opportunities and implications. Farnham, Surrey/Burlington: Ashgate.
Nelson, T. D. (2002). Ageism: Stereotyping and prejudice against older persons. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Palmore, E. B., et al. (2005). Encyclopedia of ageism. Binghamton: Haworth Pastoral Press/Haworth Reference Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this entry
Cite this entry
Ehni, HJ. (2016). Ageism. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09482-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09483-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities