Skip to main content

Advertising

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 182 Accesses

Abstract

Advertising in the etymological sense refers to the action of drawing attention to a product, in order to accomplish the goal of selling it. Advertising of health-related services or products can be done in an open or a disguised form. When advertised openly, health-related products can be directed to the final consumer, or the health professional, being the former the most frequent target of such strategy. When the advertising occurs in a disguised form, it is usually camouflaged as education, and, in this case, the health professional is the preferred target. Although any form of advertising of health-related products may represent ethical problems, it is the advertising disguised as education the most dangerous threat to the global community, because it is not recognized as advertising or marketing, and it is responsible for a great part of the social burden that the cost of pharmaceutical products represent. The bioethical approach of principlism may be used to put advertising in perspective. All four principles (respect for autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice) are hurt by advertising, both open and disguised. However, it is intervention bioethics that is the most appropriate approach to take action against the consequences of advertising of health-related products, because of its more political nature. It is not enough to disclose conflicts of interest. All disguised advertising should be banned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   1,799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   1,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Angell, M. (2005). The truth about drug companies. How they deceive us and what to do about it. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appiah, K. A. (2008). The case against character. In K. A. Appiah (Ed.), Experimental ethics (pp. 33–72). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably irrational. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of biomedical ethics (7th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellin, M., McCarthy, S., Drevlow, L., & Pierach, C. (2004). Medical students’ exposure to pharmaceutical industry marketing: A survey at one U.S. medical school. Academic Medicine, 79(11), 1041–1045.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, E. G., Gruen, R. L., Mountford, J., Miller, L. G., Cleary, P. D., & Blumenthal, D. (2007). A national survey of physician–industry relationships. New England Journal of Medicine, 356, 1742–1750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donohue, J. M., Cevasco, M., & Rosenthal, M. B. (2007). A decade of direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs. New England Journal of Medicine, 357, 673–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagundes, M. J. D., Soares, M. G. A., Diniz, M. N., Pires, J. R., & Garrafa, V. (2007). Análise bioética da propaganda e publicidade de medicamentos. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 12(1), 221–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrafa, V., & Porto, D. (2003a). Intervention bioethics: A proposal for peripheral countries in a context of power and injustice. Bioethics, 17(5–6), 399–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gettings, J., O’Neill, B., Chokshi, D. A., Colbert, J. A., Gill, P., Lebovic, G., Lexchin, J., & Persaud, N. (2014). Differences in the volume of pharmaceutical advertisements between print general medical journals. PLoS ONE, 9(1), e84790. doi:10.1371/journal.29. Retrieved from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0084790. Last Accessed 4 Oct 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D., Caplan, A., & Merz, J. F. (2003). All gifts large and small toward an understanding of the ethics of pharmaceutical industry gift-giving. The American Journal of Bioethics, 3(3), 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machiavelli, N. (1984). The prince (pp. 111–113). São Paulo: Círculo do Livro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. (2001). Republic. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbekian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wazana, A. (2000). Physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: Is a gift ever just a gift? JAMA, 283(3), 373–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2015). Pharmaceutical industry. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/trade/glossary/story073/en/. Last accessed 4 Oct 2015.

Further Readings

  • Garrafa, V., & Porto, D. (2003b). Bioethics, power and injustice. Journal International de Bioéthique, 14(1), 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldacre, B. (2014). Bad pharma. How drug companies mislead doctors and harm patients. Orlando: MacClelland & Stuart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J. (2013). Moral tribes. Emotion, reason, and the gap between us and them. New York: The Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Méró, L. (1998). Moral calculations. Game theory, logic, and human frailty. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Flávio R. L. Paranhos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Paranhos, F.R.L. (2016). Advertising. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics