Abstract
Currently, the global science system undergoes an epochal transformation which can be summarized as a transition from It-Science to Bit-Science. Bit-Science, as a new phase in the evolution of science, has brought about fundamental changes in scientific production processes, significant reconfigurations in the architecture of science, new organizations of research designs, and complex interaction patterns with the societal and natural environments of science. The great transformation from It-Science to Bit-Science can be summarized as a dual revolution in complexity and reflexivity. The emergence of second-order science becomes by far the most significant change for the rise in reflexivity dimensions of the overall science system. In view of these fundamental transformations of the science system, a new type of cybernetics can be developed under the name of “new cybernetics,” which supersedes the area of traditional or first-order cybernetics, introduced by Norbert Wiener and second-order cybernetics, constructed as a new reflexive version of cybernetics since the late 1960s with its emphasis on observing systems, goals, and observers. The second part of this article explores the new cognitive horizons of new cybernetics as well as its central goals, functions, and tasks. New cybernetics becomes a unique domain with a maximum degree of reflexivity for the science system in general.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Ashby, W. R. (1954). Design for a brain. New York: Wiley.
Ashby, W. R. (1956). An introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall.
Atmanspacher, H., & Dalenoort, G. J. (Eds.). (1994). Inside versus outside. Endo- and exo-concepts of observation and knowledge in physics, philosophy and cognitive science. Berlin: Springer.
Barbour, J. (2011). Bit from it. In A. Aguirre, B. Foster, & Z. Merali (Eds.), It from bit or bit from it. On physics and information (pp. 197–211). Heidelberg: Springer.
Barry, J. A. (1991). Technobabble. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Beck, U. (1986). Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Beck, U. (2000). World risk society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck, U. (2007). Weltrisikogesellschaft. Auf der Suche nach der verlorenen Sicherheit. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: Wiley.
Burns, D. (2007). Systemic action research: a strategy for whole system change. Bristol: Policy Press.
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2009). ‘Mode 3’ and ‘quadruple helix’: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3/4), 201–234.
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2010). Triple helix, quadruple helix and quintuple helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41–69.
Card, N. A. (2012). Applied meta-analysis for social science research. New York: Guilford Publications.
Chaitin, G. J. (2009). Evolution of mutating software. EATCS Bulletin, 97, 157–164.
Dusa, A., Nelle, D., Stock, G., & Wagner, G. G. (Eds.). (2014). Facing the future: European research infrastructures for the humanities and social sciences. Berlin: Scivero.
ESFRI. (2006). European roadmap for research infrastructures. In Report 2006. Luxembourg: European Commission.
ESFRI. (2008). European roadmap for research infrastructures. In Roadmap 2008. Luxembourg: European Commission.
ESFRI. (2011). Strategy report on research infrastructures. In Roadmap 2010. Luxembourg: European Commission.
Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: the triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Social Science Information, 42, 293–337.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2003). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109–123.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1998). The endless transition: a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Minerva, 36, 271–288.
Fals Borda, O. (1978). Über das Problem, wie man die Realität erforscht, um sie zu verändern. In H. Moser & H. Ornauer (Eds.), Internationale Aspekte der Aktionsforschung (pp. 78–112). München: Kösel.
Foerster, H. V. (Ed.). (1974). Cybernetics of cybernetics or the control of control and the communication of communication. Urbana: The Biological Computer Laboratory.
Foerster, H. V. (2003). Understanding understanding: essays on cybernetics and cognition. New York: Springer.
Foerster, H. V. (Ed.). (2014). The beginning of heaven and earth has no name. Seven days with second-order cybernetics. New York: Fordham University Press.
Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). The emergence of post-normal science. In R. V. Schomberg (Ed.), Science, politics, and morality: scientific uncertainty and decision making (pp. 85–123). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (2001). Post-normal science: Science and governance under conditions of complexity. In M. Decker (Ed.), Interdisciplinarity in technology assessment: Implementation and its chances and limits (pp. 15–24). Berlin: Springer.
Gerbode, F. A. (2013). Beyond psychology: An introduction to metapsychology. Ann Arbor: Applied Metapsychology International Press.
Gerovitch, S. (2002). From newspeak to cyberspeak. A history of soviet cybernetics. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage Publications.
Glanville, R. (2009). The black b∞x, 39 steps (Vol. III). Wien: Edition Echoraum.
Glanville, R. (2012). The black b∞x, Cybernetic circles (Vol. I). Wien: Edition Echoraum.
Glanville, R. (2014). The black b∞x, Living in cybernetic circles (Vol. II). Wien: Edition Echoraum.
Glasersfeld, E. V. (1981). The concepts of adaptation and viability in a radical constructivist theory of knowledge. In I. E. Sigel, D. M. Brodzinsky, & R. M. Golinkoff (Eds.), Piagetian Theory and Research (pp. 87–95). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3–8.
Glass, G. V., McGraw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (2007). Introduction to action research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Hayek, F. v. (1967). The theory of complex phenomena. In Studies in philosophy, politics and economics (pp. 22–42). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Hayek, F. v. (1972). Die theorie komplexer phänomene. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic.
Heims, S. J. (1985). John von Neumann and Norbert wiener. From mathematics to the Technologies of Life and Death. New York: McGraw Hill.
Heims, S. (1991). The cybernetics group. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Helbing, D. (1993). Stochastische methoden, nichtlineare dynamik und quantitative modelle sozialer prozesse. Aachen: Shaker.
Hollingsworth, J. R., & Müller, K. H. (2008). Transforming socio-economics with a new epistemology. Socio-Economic Review, 6, 395–426.
Hollingsworth, R. J., & Hollingsworth, E. J. (2011). Major discoveries, creativity, and the dynamics of science. Wien: edition echoraum.
Hunt, M. (1999). How science takes stock: The story of meta-analysis. New York: Russell Sage.
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (1st ed.). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Kahn, H., & Wiener, A. (1967). The year 2000: A framework for speculation on the next thirty-three years. New York: MacMillan.
Kajfež-Bogataj, L., Müller, K. H., Svetlik, I., & Toš, N. (Eds.). (2010). Modern RISC-societies. Towards a new paradigm for societal evolution. Wien: edition echoraum.
Kauffman, L. H. (1987). Self-reference and recursive forms. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 10, 53–72.
Kauffman, L. H. (2005). Eigen-forms: “Heinz von Foerster in memoriam” [Special issue]. Kybernetes, 34(1–2), 129–150.
Kauffman, L. H. (2009). Reflexivity and eigenform: The shape of process. Constructivist Foundations, 4(3), 121–137.
Kauffman, L. H. (2017). Cybernetics, reflexivity and second-order science. Constructivist Foundations, 3, 489–497.
Kleiner, B., Renschler, I., Wernli, B., Farago, P., & Joye, D. (Eds.). (2013). Understanding research infrastructures in the social sciences. Zürich: Seismo.
Kline, R. R. (2015). The cybernetics moment or why we call our age the information age. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The knowledge-based economy: Modeled, measured, simulated. Boca Raton: Universal Publishers.
Light, J. S. (2003). From warfare to welfare. Defense intellectuals and urban problems in cold war America. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Malnar, B., & Müller, K. H. (2015). Surveys and reflexivity. A second-order analysis of the European Social Survey (ESS). Wien: edition echoraum.
Mead, M. (1968). Cybernetics of cybernetics. In H. von Foerster et al. (Eds.), Purposive systems (pp. 1–11). New York: Spartan Books.
Michael, D. M. (1962). Cybernation: The silent conquest. Santa Barbara: Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions.
Müller, A., & Müller, K. H. (Eds.). (2007). An unfinished revolution? Heinz von Foerster and the Biological Computer Laboratory – BCL, 1958–1976. Wien: edition echoraum.
Müller, K. H. (2012). The new science of cybernetics. The evolution of living research designs. Wien: edition echoraum.
Müller, K. H. (2013a). Lebenslagen, Ungleichheit und Lebensqualität aus radikal konstruktivistischer Perspektive. In F. Kolland & K. H. Müller (Eds.), Alter und Gesellschaft im Umbruch. Festschrift für Anton Amann (pp. 219–261). Wien: edition echoraum.
Müller, K. H. (2013b). Second-Order Analysen als neues Aufgabenfeld von sozialwissenschaftlichen Datenarchiven. e-WISDOM, 6, 85–106.
Müller, K. H. (2013c). Non-linear innovations. In E. G. Carayannis (Ed.), Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation, and entrepreneurship (pp. 1381–1391). Berlin: Springer.
Müller, K. H. (2014). Towards a general methodology for second-order science. Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 12(5), 33–42.
Müller, K. H. (2016). Second-order science. The revolution of scientific structures. Wien: edition echoraum.
Müller, K. H., & Riegler, A. (2014). Second-order science: A vast and largely unexplored science frontier. Constructivist Foundations, 10(1), 7–15.
Müller, K. H., & Toš, N. (2012). Towards a new kind of social science. Social research in the context of science II and RISC-societies. Wien: edition echoraum.
Nentwich, M., & König, R. (2012). Cyberscience 2.0. Research in the age of digital social networks. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
Newman, M. (2005). Power laws, pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemporary Physics, 46, 323–351.
Newman, M., Barabasi, A. L., & Watts, D. (Eds.). (2006). The structure and dynamics of networks. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Nielsen, M. (2011). Reinventing discovery. The new era of networked science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Noffke, S., & Somekh, B. (2009). The SAGE handbook of educational action research. London: Sage.
Nordman, A., Radder, H., & Schiemann, G. (2011). Science transformed? Debating claims of an epochal break. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science. Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Pask, G. (1996). Heinz von Foerster’s self-organisation, the progenitor of conversation and interaction theories. Systems Research, 13(3), 349–362.
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2001). The SAGE handbook of action research. Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage.
Riegler, A., & Müller, K. H. (Eds.). (2014). Second-order science. Constructivist Foundations, 10(1), 7–15. (Special issue).
Rössler, O. E. (1992). Endophysics. Die Welt des inneren Beobachters. Berlin: Merwe Verlag. (mit einem Vorwort von Peter Weibel).
Scott, B. (2011). Explorations in second-order cybernetics. Reflections on cybernetics, psychology and education. Wien: edition echoraum.
Shneiderman, B. (2008). Science 2.0. Science, 319, 1349–1350.
Sornette, D. (2006). Critical phenomena in natural sciences: Chaos, fractals, selforganization and disorder: Concepts and tools. Berlin: Springer.
Spencer-Brown, G. (1969). Laws of form. London: Allen & Unwin.
Umpleby, S. A. (1991). Strategies for winning acceptance of second order cybernetics. Keynote address at the International Symposium on Systems Research, Informatics, and Cybernetics, Baden-Baden.
Umpleby, S. A. (2007). Reflexivity in social systems: The theories of George Soros. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 24, 515–522.
Umpleby, S. A. (2010a). From complexity to reflexivity: Underlying logics used in science. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 1, 15–26.
Umpleby, S. A. (2010b). From complexity to reflexivity: The next step in the systems sciences. In R. Trappl (Ed.), Cybernetics and systems 2010 (pp. 281–286). Vienna: Austrian Society for Cybernetic Studies.
Umpleby, S. A. (2015). A global strategy for human development as an example of an alternative goal set in science. Lecture at the International Society for Systems Science (ISSS), Berlin.
Umpleby, S. A. (2016), Second-order cybernetics as a fundamental revolution in science. Constructivist Foundations, 3, 455–465.
Van de Vijver, G. (Ed.). (1992). New perspectives on cybernetics: Self-organization, autonomy and connectionism. Dordercht: Kluwer.
Waldorp, M. M. (2008). Science 2.0: Great new tool, or great risk? Scientific American, 298, 68–73.
Wagner, M., & Weiß, B. (2014). Meta-analyse. In N. Baur & J. Blasius (Eds.), Handbuch methoden der empirischen sozialforschung (pp. 1117–1128). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Welton, N. J., Sutton, A. J., Cooper, N. J., Abrams, K. R., & Ades, A. E. (2012). Evidence synthesis for decision making in healthcare. Chichester: Wiley.
Wheeler, J. A. (1990). Information, physics, quantum: The search for links. In W. Zurek (Ed.), Complexity, entropy, and the physics of information (pp. 309–336). Redwood City: Addison-Wesley.
Whitehead, A. (2002). Meta-analysis of controlled trials. Chichester: Wiley.
Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics, or control and communication in the animal and the machine. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Müller, K.H. (2018). Second-Order Science and New Cybernetics. In: Carayannis, E., Campbell, D., Efthymiopoulos, M. (eds) Handbook of Cyber-Development, Cyber-Democracy, and Cyber-Defense. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09069-6_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09069-6_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09068-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09069-6
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences