Abstract
While providing an introduction to and explanation of the four crucial elements of a medical malpractice claim, this chapter discusses the most common theories of transplantation liability and related issues facing surgeons and other practitioners. Causes of action are considered within the broader context of the current medical malpractice environment. Drawing upon factual examples of litigation concerning organ transplantation, this chapter explains the physician’s legal duty, circumstances constituting breach of duty, proximate causation of injury, and damages caused by breach. Possible areas of liability and triggers of litigation in the transplantation setting, including the unique challenges posed by the legal need to obtain the informed consent of donors and recipients, shall be explored before reviewing the ways in which diligent documentation and clear communication by the medical team can constitute the crux of a case. Having discussed the resolution of transplantation conflicts between parties via litigation, this chapter ends by considering the various means by which patients and doctors can come to terms outside of the courtroom.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
ASTS (2010) American Society of Transplant Surgeons: ASTS statement on recent living liver donor deaths. Available at https://asts.org/docs/default-source/position-statements/living-liver-donor-deaths-august-13-2010.pdf?sfvrsn=4. Accessed 10 Sept 2015
ASTS (2012) American Society of Transplant Surgeons: ASTS statement on recent living kidney donor death. Available at https://asts.org/docs/default-source/position-statements/recent-living-donor-death-june-12-2012.pdf?sfvrsn=4. Accessed 10 Sept 2015
Baccore v. Mennella (1976) 246 Pa. Super. 53, 369 A.2d 806
Barnes v. Schlein (1984) 192 Conn. 732, 473 A.2d 1221
Berlinger N (2003) Broken stories: patients, families, and clinicians after medical error. Lit Med 22:230–240
Bernhard B (2005) Liver program at UCI closes. Orange County Register. Available at http://www.ocregister.com/articles/uci-192296-liver-transplant.html. Accessed 5 Oct 2015
Berthelsen C (2007) UCI liver program claims settled. LA Times. Available at http://articles.latimes.com/2007/jul/26/local/me-uci26. Accessed 30 Oct 2015
Bismark M, Dauer E (2006) Motivations for medico-legal action: lessons from New Zealand. J Leg Med 27(1):55–70
Buraczynski v. Eyring (Tenn. 1996) 919 S.W.2d 314
Campobasso C, Quaranta R, Dell’Erba A (2005) Living donor kidney transplant: medicolegal and insurance aspects. Transplant Proc 37:2439–2444
Carroll v. Morgan (5th Cir. 1994) 17 F.3d 787
Carroll v. Pittsburgh Rys. Co. (1962) 200 Pa. Super. 80, 187 A.2d 293, 295
Caviglia v. Tate (Tex App. 2012) 365 S.W.3d 804
Chen P (2011) When the Doctor Faces a Lawsuit. NY Times. Available at http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/15/when-the-doctor-gets-sued-2/. Accessed 18 Nov 2015
Cline v. Kresa-Reahl (2012) 229 W. Va. 203, 728 S.E.2d 87
Cohen E (2012) Organ donor’s surgery death sparks questions. CNN. Available at http://www.cnn.com/2012/04/08/health/cohen-donor-safety/. Accessed 5 Oct 2015
del Barrio M, Lacunza M, Armendariz A et al (2004) Liver transplant patients: their experience in the intensive care unit. A phenomenological study. J Clin Nurs 13:967–976
Dellwo v. Pearson (1961) 259 Minn. 452, 107 N.W.2d 859
Dickhoff v. Green (Minn. 2012) 811 N.W.2d 109, 112–13
Doe v. University of Chicago Medical Center (Ill. App. 1st 2014) 386 Ill. Dec. 140, 20 N.E. 3d 1
Eaddy v. Hamaty (Pa. Super. 1997) 694 A.2d 639, 642
Festa v. Greenberg (1986) 354 Pa. Super. 346, 511 A.2d 1371, allocatur denied, 515 Pa. 580, 527 A.2d 541 (1987)
Flanagan v. Wesselhoeft (R.I. 2001) 765 A.2d 1203
Flatt v. Kantak (2004) 2004 ND 173, 687 N.W.2d 208
FreeAdvice.com (2015) USC liver transplant program under investigation: third California hospital faces review. Available at http://law.freeadvice.com/insurance_law/health_insurance/usc-liver-transplant-program.htm. Accessed 30 Oct 2015
Garcia v. Robinson (2015) 135 Haw. 308, 349 P.3d 415
Giannelli P, Imwinkelried E (1993). 1 Scientific Evidence, 2nd edn. §§ 5–9
Giles v. Brookwood Health Servs., Inc. (Ala. 2008) 5 So. 3d 533
Gloffke v. Robinson (Pa. Commw. 2002) 812 A.2d 728
Gordon v. Trovato (1975) 234 Pa. Super. 279, 338 A.2d 653
Gordon E et al (2015) Most live donors mistakenly believe they are well-informed of liver donation. J Hepatol. Available at http://www.healio.com/hepatology/transplantation/news/online/%7B307ad557-7973-464a-8970-103e5616849b%7D/most-live-donors-mistakenly-believe-they-are-well-informed-of-liver-donation. Accessed 28 Sept 2015
Gouse v. Cassel (1992) 532 Pa. 197, 615 A.2d 331
Gunn v. Robertson (2001) (La. App. 5 Cir. 11/14/01); 801 So. 2d 555
Hamilton v. Good Samaritan Hosp. of Suffern, N.Y. (N.Y. App. Div. 2010) 900 N.Y.S.2d 368, 73 A.D.3d 697
Hickson G, Federspiel C, Pichert J et al (2002) Patient complaints and malpractice risk. JAMA 287:2951–2957
Hrynkiw v. Trammell (Ala. 2012) 96 So.3d 794
Jena A, Chandra A, Lakdawalla D et al (2012) Outcomes of medical malpractice litigation against US physicians. Arch Intern Med 172:892–894
Jennings v. Badgett (2010) 2010 OK 7, 230 P.3d 861
Joyce v. Boulevard Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Ctr. (Pa. Super. 1997) 694 A.2d 648
Kachalia A (2013) Improving patient safety through transparency. N Engl J Med 369:1677–1679
Kearns v. Clark (1985) 343 Pa. Super. 30, 493 A.2d 1358
Kowalczyk L (2013) Brigham and Women’s airing medical mistakes. The Boston Globe. Available at https://www.bostonglobe.com/lifestyle/health-wellness/2013/04/09/brigham-and-women-publishes-stories-medical-errors-focus-staff-attention-solutions/heFVdgGnLc2O9QqL1eiMnN/story.html. Accessed 23 Oct 2015
Largey v. Rothman (1988) 110 N.J. 204, 540 A.2d 504
Lubbers v. Anderson (Minn. 1995) 539 N.W.2d 398
Lucey M, Terrault N et al (2013) Long-term management of the successful adult liver transplant: 2012 practice guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the American Society of Transplantation. Liver Transpl 19:3–26
Mackey T, Liang B (2011) The role of practice guidelines in medical malpractice litigation. Am Med Assoc J Ethics 13(1):36–41
Malik v. William Beaumont Hospital (1988) 168 Mich. App. 159, 423 N.W.2d 920
Maliszewski v. Rendon (1988) 374 Pa. Super. 109, 542 A.2d 170, allocatur denied, 520 Pa. 617, 554 A.2d 510 (1989)
Mattos v. Thompson (Pa. 1980) 421 A.2d 130
McCullough M (2006) Prescribing arbitration to cure the common crisis: developing legislation to facilitate arbitration as an alternative to litigating medical malpractice disputes in Pennsylvania. Pa State Law Rev 110:809–831
McDonald v. Memorial Hosp. at Gulfport (Miss. 2009) 8 So.3d 175
McDonald T, Helmchen L, Smith K et al (2010) Responding to patient safety incidents: the “seven pillars”. Qual Saf Health Care 19:1–4
Meckler L (2007) New limits debated for organ donation: transplant group propose barring donors who have certain health problems; balancing risk vs. need. Wall St J. Available at http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB118963876140025724. Accessed 10 Sept 2015
Mello M, Studdert D, Kachalia A (2014) The medical liability climate and prospects for reform. JAMA 312:2146–2155
Meruelo N (2008) Mediation and medical malpractice: the need to understand why patients sue and a proposal for a specific model of mediation. J Leg Med 29:285–306
Miller C, Smith M, Fujiki M et al (2013) Preparing for the inevitable: the death of a living liver donor. Liver Transpl 19(6):656–660
Mitzelfelt v. Kamrin (1990) 526 Pa. 54, 584 A.2d 888
Moore v. Shah (1982) 458 N.Y.S.2d 33, 90 A.D.2d 389
Morlino v. Medical Ctr. of Ocean Cnty. (1998) 152 N.J. 563, 706 A.2d 721
Moure v. Raeuchle (1992) 529 Pa. 394, 604 A.2d 1003
NPDB (2001) National Practitioner Data Bank guidebook, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration, Division of Quality Assurance, Pub. No. HRSA-95-255. Available at https://www.ire.org/media/uploads/files/datalibrary/npdb/guidebook.pdf. Accessed 4 Nov 2015
NPDB (2014) National Practitioner Data Bank. 2012 Annual Report. Available at http://www.npdb.hrsa.gov/resources/annualRpt.jsp. Data accessed 29 Oct 2015
Quinby v. Plumsteadville Family Practice, Inc. (2006) 589 Pa. 183, 907 A.2d 1061
Reilly v. Pinkus (1949) 338 U.S. 269, 70 S. Ct. 110
Ripley v. Lanzer (2009) 152 Wash. App. 296, 215 P.3d 1020
Rosenbaum L (2015) The paternalism preference – choosing unshared decision making. N Engl J Med 373:589–592
Rowe M (2002) The rest is silence: hospitals and doctors should beware of what can fill the space of their silence after a loved one’s death. Health Aff 21(4):232–236. Available at http://ezproxy.villanova.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/204643452?accountid=14853. Accessed 8 Sept 2015
Rowe M (2003) Mortality and medicine: forms of silence and of speech. J Med Ethics 29(2):72–76
Sage W (2014) Medical malpractice reform: when is it about money? Why is it about time? JAMA 312(20):2103–2105
Schloendorff v. Society of the N.Y. Hosp. (1914) 211 N.Y. 125, 105 N.E. 92
Slater v. Baker & Stapleton (K.B. 1767) 95 Eng. Rep. 860
Southard v. Temple Univ. Hosp. (2001) 566 Pa. 335, 781 A.2d 101
Staccato v. Valley Hosp. (2007) 123 Nev. 526, 170 P.3d 503
Stalsitz v. Allentown Hosp. (Pa. Super. 2002) 814 A.2d 766
Syfu v. Quinn (Ind. Ct. App. 2005) 826 N.E.2d 699
Turner v. Heston (1983) 172 W. Va. 80, 303 S.E.2d 718
United States v. Coleman (1994) 41 M.J. 46
Valles v. Albert Einstein Med. Ctr. (2002) 569 Pa. 542, 805 A.2d 1232
White v. Leimbach (2011) 131 Ohio St. 3d 21, 959 N.E.2d 1033
Whittington v. Mason (2005) 905 So. 2d 1261
Wigmore (1976) 6 Evidence. Chadbourn (ed) § 1700
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this entry
Cite this entry
Ryan, D.F., Peel, P.E., Mintzer, C.A. (2017). Transplant Program Liability and Risk Factors for Litigation. In: Doria, C. (eds) Contemporary Liver Transplantation. Organ and Tissue Transplantation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07209-8_42
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07209-8_42
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07208-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07209-8
eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine