Abstract
While for the Triple Helix model the existence of a democracy is not necessary for knowledge production and innovation, the Quadruple Helix is here more explicit. The way, how the Quadruple Helix is being engineered, designed, and “architected,” from that it is clear that there cannot be a Quadruple Helix innovation system without democracy or a democratic context. The following attributes and components define the fourth helix in the Quadruple Helix: “media-based and culture-based public,” “civil society,” and “arts, artistic research and arts-based innovation.” By this the fourth helix in the Quadruple Helix represents the perspective of the “dimension of democracy” or the “context of democracy” for knowledge, knowledge production, and innovation. This is particularly true when democracy is to be understood to transcend the narrow understanding of being primarily based on or being primarily rooted in government institutions (within Triple Helix). Civil society, culture-based public, quality of democracy, and sustainable development convincingly demonstrate what the rationales and requirements are for conceptualizing democracy broader. Political pluralism in a democracy coevolves with the pluralism, diversity, and heterogeneity of knowledge, knowledge production, and innovation (“Democracy of Knowledge”). The Quintuple Helix extends the Quadruple Helix by aspects of the “natural environments of society and economy,” “social ecology,” and the “socio-ecological transition.” Also this environmental context of society can be better addressed in a democracy than in a nondemocracy. The current world appears to be challenged by a race between developing democracies versus emerging autocracies over knowledge production and innovation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Bast, G. (2013). Preparing a “creative revolution” – Arts and universities of the arts in the creative knowledge economy. In E. G. Carayannis (Editor-in-Chief), I. N. Dubina, N. Seel, D. F. J. Campbell, & D. Uzunidis (Associate Editors) (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 1471–1476). New York: Springer. http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_442
Bast, G., Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (Eds.). (2015). Arts, research, innovation and society. New York: Springer. http://www.springer.com/business+%26+management/technology+management/book/978-3-319-09908-8
Boulding, K. E. (1985). The world as a total system. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1997). Co-opetition. New York: Doubleday.
Bush, V. (1945). Science: The endless frontier. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office. http://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/nsf50/vbush1945.htm#transmittal
Campbell, D. F. J. (2001). Politische Steuerung über öffentliche Förderung universitärer Forschung? Systemtheoretische Überlegungen zu Forschungs- und Technologiepolitik. [Political steering through public support of university research? Systems-theoretical considerations about research and technology policy]. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft (Austrian Journal of Political Science), 30(4), 425–438.
Campbell, D. F. J. (2011). Wissenschaftliche „Parallelkarrieren“ als Chance. Wenn Wissenschaft immer öfter zur Halbtagsbeschäftigung wird, könnte eine Lösung im „Cross-Employment“ liegen. Guest Commentary for DIE PRESSE February 2, 2011. http://diepresse.com/home/bildung/meinung/635781/Wissenschaftliche-Parallelkarrieren-als-Chance?direct=635777&_vl_backlink=/home/bildung/index.do&selChannel=500
Campbell, D. F. J. (2013a). Cross-employment. In E. G. Carayannis (Editor-in-Chief), I. N. Dubina, N. Seel, D. F. J. Campbell, & D. Uzunidis (Associate Editors) (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 503–508). New York: Springer. http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_254
Campbell, G. S. (2013b). Speaking pictures: Innovation in fine arts. In E. G. Carayannis (Editor-in-Chief), I. N. Dubina, N. Seel, D. F. J. Campbell, & D. Uzunidis (Associate Editors) (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 1716–1722). New York: Springer. http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_484
Campbell, D. F. J., & Carayannis, E. G. (2012). Lineare und nicht-lineare knowledge production: Innovative Herausforderungen für das Hochschulsystem. Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung, 7(2), 64–72. http://www.zfhe.at/index.php/zfhe/article/view/448
Campbell, D. F. J., & Carayannis, E. G. (2013a). Quality of democracy and innovation. In E. G. Carayannis (Editor-in-Chief), I. N. Dubina, N. Seel, D. F. J. Campbell, & D. Uzunidis (Associate Editors) (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 1527–1534). New York: Springer. http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-1-4614-3858-8_509#
Campbell, D. F. J., & Carayannis, E. G. (2013b). Epistemic governance in higher education. Quality enhancement of universities for development. SpringerBriefs in business. New York: Springer. http://www.springer.com/business+%26+management/organization/book/978-1-4614-4417-6
Campbell, D. F. J., & Carayannis, E. G. (2013c). Epistemic governance and epistemic innovation policy. In E. G. Carayannis (Editor-in-Chief), I. N. Dubina, N. Seel, D. F. J. Campbell, & D. Uzunidis (Associate Editors) (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 697–702). New York: Springer. http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_271
Campbell, D. F. J., & Carayannis, E. G. (2015). Explaining and comparing quality of democracy in quadruple helix structures: The quality of democracy in the United States and in Austria, challenges and opportunities for development. In E. G. Carayannis, D. F. J. Campbell, & M. P. Efthymiopoulos (Eds.), Cyber-development, cyber-democracy and cyber-defense. Challenges, opportunities and implications for theory, policy and practice. New York: Springer. http://www.springer.com/social+sciences/political+science/book/978-1-4939-1027-4
Campbell, D. F. J., & Carayannis, E. G. (2016a). Epistemic governance and epistemic innovation policy. Technology, Innovation and Education, 2(2), 1–15. doi:10.1186/s40660-016-0008-2. http://technology-innovation-education.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40660-016-0008-2
Campbell, D. F. J., & Carayannis, E. G. (2016b). The academic firm: A new design and redesign proposition for entrepreneurship in innovation-driven knowledge economy. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 5(12), 1–10. doi:10.1186/s13731-016-0040-1. http://innovation-entrepreneurship.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13731-016-0040-1
Campbell, D. F. J., Carayannis, E. G., & Rehman, S. S. (2015). Quadruple helix structures of quality of democracy in innovation systems: The USA, OECD countries, and EU member countries in global comparison. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 6(3), 467–493. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13132-015-0246-7
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2006). Mode 3″: Meaning and implications from a knowledge systems perspective. In E. G. Carayannis & D. F. J. Campbell (Eds.), Knowledge creation, diffusion, and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters. A comparative systems approach across the United States, Europe and Asia (pp. 1–25). Westport: Praeger.
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3/4), 201–234. http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=27&year=2009&vol=46&issue=3/4 and http://www.inderscience.com/search/index.php?action=record&rec_id=23374&prevQuery=&ps=10&m=or
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2010). Triple helix, quadruple helix and quintuple helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41–69. https://www.igi-global.com/article/triple-helix-quadruple-helix-quintuple/41959
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems. 21st-century democracy, innovation, and entrepreneurship for development. SpringerBriefs in business. New York: Springer. http://www.springer.com/business+%26+management/book/978-1-4614-2061-3
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2014). Developed democracies versus emerging autocracies: Arts, democracy, and innovation in quadruple helix innovation systems. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 3(12), 1–23. http://www.innovation-entrepreneurship.com/content/3/1/12
Carayannis, E. G., & Kaloudis, A. (2010). A time for action and a time to lead: Democratic capitalism and a new “New Deal” for the US and the world in the twenty-first century. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1(1), 4–17. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13132-009-0002-y
Carayannis, E. G., & Pirzadeh, A. (2014). The knowledge of culture and the culture of knowledge. implications for theory, policy and practice. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. http://www.amazon.de/The-Knowledge-Culture-Implications-Practice/dp/1403942439/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1403080044&sr=8-1&keywords=carayannis+knowledge+of+culture
Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). The quintuple helix innovation model: Global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 1–12. http://www.innovation-entrepreneurship.com/content/pdf/2192-5372-1-2.pdf
Carayannis, E. G., Campbell, D. F. J., & Rehman, S. S. (2016). Mode 3 knowledge production: Systems and systems theory, clusters and networks. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 5(17), 1–24 doi: 10.1186/s13731-016-0045-9. http://innovation-entrepreneurship.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13731-016-0045-9
Danilda, I., Lindberg, M., & Torstensson, B. -M. (2009). Women resource centres. A quattro helix innovation system on the European agenda. Paper http://www.hss09.se/own_documents/Papers/3-11%20-%20Danilda%20Lindberg%20&%20Torstensson%20-%20paper.pdf
Dubina, I. N., Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). Creativity economy and a crisis of the economy? Coevolution of knowledge, innovation, and creativity, and of the knowledge economy and knowledge society. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(1), 1–24. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13132-011-0042-y
Eigelsreiter, B. (2017). Consumerization of IT, cyber-democracy and cyber-crime: The inherent challenges and opportunities of different ends of a continuum. In E. G. Carayannis, D. F. J. Campbell, M. P. Efthymiopoulos (Eds.), Handbook of cyber-development, cyber-democracy, and cyber-defense. New York: Springer. https://link.springer.com/referencework/10.1007%2F978-3-319-06091-0
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109–123.
European Commission. (2009). The world in 2025. Rising Asia and socio-ecological transition. Brussels: European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/research/social-sciences/pdf/the-world-in-2025-report_en.pdf
Fischer-Kowalski, M., & Haberl, H. (Eds.). (2007). Socioecological transitions and global change. Trajectories of social metabolism and land use. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (Eds.). (1994). The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
Hemlin, S., Allwood, C. M., & Martin, B. R. (2004). Creative knowledge environments. The influences on creativity in research and innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Kaiser, R., & Prange, H. (2004). The reconfiguration of national innovation systems – The example of German biotechnology. Research Policy, 33, 395–408.
Kuhlmann, S. (2001). Future governance of innovation policy in Europe – Three scenarios. Research Policy, 30, 953–976.
Laperche, B., & Uzunidis, D. (2018). The knowledge capital of the network firm: Socialization versus business appropriation of scientific work. In G. Bast, E. G. Carayannis, & D. F. J. Campbell (rédacteurs) (Eds.), The future of education and labor (ARIS series: Arts, research, innovation and society). New York: Springer (forthcoming).
Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The triple helix, quadruple helix, …, and an n-tuple of helices: Explanatory models for analyzing the knowledge-based economy? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(1), 25–35. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13132-011-0049-4
Lundvall, B.-Å. (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.
Malerba, F. (1999). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. DRUID conference on: National innovation systems, industrial dynamics and innovation policy (Rebild, June 9–12, 1999). http://www.druid.dk/uploads/tx_picturedb/ds1999-69.pdf
Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31(2), 247–264.
Malerba, F. (2004). Sectoral systems of innovation: Concepts, issues and analyses of six major sectors in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Merz, M., & Sormani, P. (rédacteurs.). (2016). The local configuration of new research fields. On regional and national diversity. Cham: Springer.
Mitterlehner, B. (2014). Cyber-democracy and cybercrime: Two sides of the same coin, 207–230. In E. G. Carayannis, D. F. J. Campbell, & M. P. Efthymiopoulos (Eds.), Cyber-development, cyber-democracy and cyber-defense. Challenges, opportunities and implications for theory, policy and practice. New York: Springer.
Nelson, R. R. (1990). Capitalism as an engine of progress. Research Policy, 19, 193–214.
Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science. Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2003). Mode 2 revisited: The new production of knowledge. Minerva, 41, 179–194.
Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2006). Re-thinking science: Mode 2 in societal context. In E. G. Carayannis & D. F. J. Campbell (Eds.), Knowledge creation, diffusion, and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters. A comparative systems approach across the United States, Europe and Asia (pp. 39–51). Westport: Praeger.
Park, H. W. (2014). Transition from the triple helix to N-tuple helices? An interview with Elias G. Carayannis and David F. J. Campbell. Scientometrics, 99 (1), 203–207. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11192-013-1124-3 and http://download.springer.com/static/pdf/907/art%253A10.1007%252Fs11192-013-1124-3.pdf?auth66=1397308723_4cb0003877af5305d5dc202280b9cd6d&ext=.pdf
Pfeffer, T. (2012). Virtualization of universities. Digital media and the organization of higher education institutions. New York: Springer. http://www.springer.com/business+%26+management/media+management/book/978-1-4614-2064-4
Polanyi, M. (1962). The republic of science: Its political and economic theory. Minerva, 1, 54–74. http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/students/envs_5100/polanyi_1967.pdf and http://fiesta.bren.ucsb.edu/~gsd/595e/docs/41.%20Polanyi_Republic_of_Science.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Carayannis, E.G., Campbell, D.F.J. (2017). Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Systems and Mode 3 Knowledge Production. In: Carayannis, E., Campbell, D., Efthymiopoulos, M. (eds) Handbook of Cyber-Development, Cyber-Democracy, and Cyber-Defense. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06091-0_56-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06091-0_56-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06091-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06091-0
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences