Skip to main content

Logistic Regression and Discriminant Analysis

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Market Research

Abstract

Questions like whether a customer is going to buy a product (purchase vs. non-purchase) or whether a borrower is creditworthy (pay off debt vs. credit default) are typical in business practice and research. From a statistical perspective, these questions are characterized by a dichotomous dependent variable. Traditional regression analyses are not suitable for analyzing these types of problems, because the results that such models produce are generally not dichotomous. Logistic regression and discriminant analysis are approaches using a number of factors to investigate the function of a nominally (e.g., dichotomous) scaled variable. This chapter covers the basic objectives, theoretical model considerations, and assumptions of discriminant analysis and logistic regression. Further, both approaches are applied in an example examining the drivers of sales contests in companies. The chapter ends with a brief comparison of discriminant analysis and logistic regression.

Dr. Sebastian Tillmanns is an Assistant Professor at the Institute of Marketing at the Westfälische Wilhelms-University Münster. Prof. Dr. Manfred Krafft is Director of the Institute of Marketing at the Westfälische Wilhelms-University Münster. The book chapter is adapted from Frenzen and Krafft (2008). We thank Linda Hollebeek for her copy-editing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aaker, D. A., Kumar, V., Day, G. S., & Leone, R. P. (2011). Marketing research (10th ed.). New York: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Afifi, A., May, S., & Clark, V. A. (2012). Practical multivariate analysis (5th ed.). Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agresti, A. (2013). Categorical data analysis (3rd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ai, C., & Norton, E. C. (2003). Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters, 80(1), 123–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, J., & Nelson, F. (1984). Linear probability, logit, and probit models. Beverly Hills: SAGE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. (1985). The salesperson as outside agent or employee: A transaction cost analysis. Marketing Science, 4(3), 234–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backhaus, K., Erichson, B., Plinke, W., & Weiber, R. (2016). Multivariate Analysemethoden (14th ed.). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baguley, T. (2012). Serious stats: A guide to advanced statistics for the behavioral sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS (4th ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenzen, H., & Krafft, M. (2008). Logistische Regression und Diskriminanzanalyse. In A. Herrmann, C. Homburg, & M. Klarmann (Eds.), Handbuch Marktforschung – Methoden, Anwendungen, Praxisbeispiele (pp. 607–649). Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, Jr, J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilbe, J. (2009). Logistic regression models. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoetker, G. (2007). The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management Journal, 28(4), 331–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, D., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied logistic regression (3rd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • King, G., & Zeng, L. (2001). Explaining rare events in international relations. International Organization, 55(3), 693–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krafft, M., Albers, S., & Lal, R. (2004). Relative explanatory power of agency theory and transaction cost analysis in German salesforces. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(4), 265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeClere, M. (1992). The interpretation of coefficients in models with qualitative dependent variables. Decision Sciences, 23(3), 770–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2014). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using stata (3rd ed.). College Station: Stata Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantrala, M., Krafft, M., & Weitz, B. (1998). Sales contests: An investigation of factors related to use of sales contests using German and US survey data. In P. Andersson (Ed.), Proceedings Track 4 – Marketing management and communication, 27th EMAC conference, Stockholm, pp. 365–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menard, S. (2002). Applied logistic regression analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, D. (1969). On the interpretation of discriminant analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 6(2), 156–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, E. C., Wang, H., & Ai, C. (2004). Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models. Stata Journal, 4(2), 154–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J. W. (2008). Best practices in quantitative methods. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peduzzi, P., Concato, J., Kemper, E., Holford, T. R., & Feinstein, A. R. (1996). A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49(12), 1373–1379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Press, S. J., & Wilson, S. (1978). Choosing between logistic regression and discriminant analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73(364), 699–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatsuoka, M. M. (1988). Multivariate analysis: Techniques for educational and psychological research (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil, H. (1970). On the estimation of relationships involving qualitative variables. American Journal of Sociology, 76(1), 103–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tillmanns, S., Ter Hofstede, F., Krafft, M., & Goetz, O. (2017). How to separate the wheat from the chaff: Improved variable selection for new customer acquisition. Journal of Marketing, 80(2), 99–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vittinghoff, E., & McCulloch, C. E. (2006). Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and cox regression. American Journal of Epidemiology, 165(6), 710–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Tillmanns .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Tillmanns, S., Krafft, M. (2017). Logistic Regression and Discriminant Analysis. In: Homburg, C., Klarmann, M., Vomberg, A. (eds) Handbook of Market Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_20-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_20-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05542-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05542-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics