Skip to main content

Recent Evolution of Gut Rehabilitation

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Organ and Tissue Transplantation ((OTT))

Abstract

The past three decades have endorsed tremendous growth in the nutritional, medical, and surgical management of patients with complex abdominal pathology and gastrointestinal failure. As efforts to conservatively rehabilitate reached a plateau, innovative surgical techniques were developed to further enhance absorption, facilitate motility, and restore homeostasis to limited, diseased, or disordered bowel. Surgical strategies are highly individualized and are guided by the type of gut failure, residual gut anatomy, and surgical candidacy. Patient selection and evaluation is thoroughly discussed, and a new classification for surgical candidates with gut failure is introduced to guide the development of an optimal therapeutic plan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Abu-Elmagd K (2008) Intestinal transplantation: indications and patient selection. In: Langnas AN, Goulet O, Quigley EM, Tappenden KA (eds) Intestinal failure: diagnosis, management and transplantation, 3rd edn. Blackwell Publishing, Chichester, pp 245–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Elmagd K (2015) The concept of gut rehabilitation and the future of visceral transplantation. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 12:108–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Elmagd KM, Costa G, McMichael D et al (2015) Autologous reconstruction and visceral transplantation for management of patients with gut failure after bariatric surgery: 20 years of experience. Ann Surg 262:586–601

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Elmagd K, Costa G, Abdulrahman H et al (2017a) Gut failure and surgical ingenuity: over five hundred open restorative procedures at a single center. Transplantation 101(S6-2):S44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Elmagd K, Khanna A, Fujiki M, Hashimoto K, El-Gazzaz G, Shatnawei A, Costa G (2017b) Surgery for gut failure: auto-reconstruction and allo-transplantation. In: Fazio V, Church JM, Delaney CP, Kiran RP (eds) Current therapy in colon and rectal surgery. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 372–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Boukerrouche A (2013) Left colonic graft in esophageal reconstruction for caustic stricture: mortality and morbidity. Dis Esophagus 26:788–793

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Calvert CR, Lal S (2011) Approaches to intestinal failure in Crohn’s disease: nutrition in inflammatory bowel disease. Proc Nutr Soc 70:336–341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costa G, Cruz RJ, Abu-Elmagd KM (2010) Surgical shunt versus TIPS for treatment of variceal hemorrhage in the current era of liver and multivisceral transplantation. Surg Clin N Am 90:891–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frasier LL, Leverson G, Gosain A, Greenberg J (2015) Laparoscopic versus open Ladd’s procedure for intestinal malrotation in adults. Surg Endosc 29:1598–1604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lal S, Teubner A, Shaffer JL (2006) Review article: intestinal failure. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 24:19–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Layec S, Beyer L, Corcos O et al (2013) Increased intestinal absorption by segmental reversal of the small bowel in adult patients with short-bowel syndrome: a case-control study. Am J Clin Nutr 97(1):100–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osman M, Fujiki M, Khanna A, Costa G, Abu-Elmagd K (2017) Piecemeal enterectomy and tumor debulking: a novel technique for advanced mesenteric desmoid tumors. Transplantation 101(S6-2):S111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quintini C, Ward G, Shatnawei A et al (2012) Mortality of intra-abdominal desmoid tumors in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Ann Surg 255:511–516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider V, Lee LD, Stroux A et al (2016) Risk factors for reoperation after ileostomy reversal – results from a prospective cohort study. Int J Surg 36:233–239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sogawa H, Costa G, Bond GJ, et al (in Press) Intestinal and multivisceral transplantation for management of chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction (CIPO): twenty years of single center experience

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudan D, Rege A (2014) Update on surgical therapies for intestinal failure. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 19:267–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sudan D, Thompson J, Botha J et al (2007) Comparison of intestinal lengthening procedures for patients with short bowel syndrome. Ann Surg 246:593–604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JS (2004) Surgical rehabilitation of intestine in short bowel syndrome. Surgery 135:465–470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JS, Pinch LW, Young R, Vanderhoof JA (2000) Long-term outcome of intestinal lengthening. Transplant Proc 32:1242–1243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tzakis AG, Pararas NB, Tekin A et al (2012) Intestinal and multivisceral autotransplantation for tumors of the root of the mesentery: long-term follow up. Surgery 152:82–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neha Parekh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Parekh, N., Abu-Elmagd, K. (2019). Recent Evolution of Gut Rehabilitation. In: Shah, A., Doria, C., Lim, J. (eds) Contemporary Pancreas and Small Bowel Transplantation . Organ and Tissue Transplantation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05257-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05257-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05256-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05257-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics