Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy

Living Edition
| Editors: Marco Sgarbi

Observation in Renaissance Science

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_958-1

Abstract

Following the Greek reflection, Renaissance authors subsumed the notion of observation under that of experience. Nonetheless, observation in Renaissance played a crucial role in the making of the modern science, when astronomers and physicians began observing the world systematically. The invention of the printing press, the discovery of the Americas, the introduction of the perspective shaped the way Renaissance actors observed the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

Primary Literature

  1. Alberti, L.B. 1991. On painting. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle. 1995. In The complete works of Aristotle, ed. D. Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bacon, F. 1962–1989. Novum Organum. In The works of Francis Bacon. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
  4. Blackwell, R. 1991. Galileo, Bellarmine and the Bible. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  5. Borelli, G.A. 1666. Theoricae Mediceorum planetarum ex causis physicis deductae. Florence: Ex Typographia S.M.D.Google Scholar
  6. Brahe, T. 1913–1929 In Tychonis Brahe Opera Omnia, ed. J.L.E. Dreyer, 15 vols. Copenhagen: Hauniae In Libraria Gyldendaliana.Google Scholar
  7. Campanella, T. 2001. Apologia pro Galileo. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
  8. Fernández de Oviedo y Valdés, G. 1959. Historia general y natural de las Indias (Madrid: Biblioteca de Autores Españoles)Google Scholar
  9. Gockel, R. (Goclenius). 1980/1613. Lexicon philosophicum. Hildesheim/New York: Georg Olms Verlag.Google Scholar
  10. Herodotus. 2003. The histories. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  11. Kepler, J. 1981 Mysterium Cosmographicum. The secret of the universe. Trans. A.M. Duncan. Introduction and commentary by E. J. Aiton, with a preface by I. Bernard Cohen. New York: Abaris Books.Google Scholar
  12. Nutton, V. 2004. Ancient Medicine (London: Routledge)Google Scholar
  13. Plato. 1997. In Theetetus in complete works, ed. John M. Cooper. Cambridge/Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Ramusio, G. 1550–1606. Navigationi et Viaggi, 3 vols. Venice: Eredi Lucantonio Giunti.Google Scholar
  15. Regiomontanus. 1544. Scripta clarissimi mathematici M. Johannis Regiomontani. Nuremberg: Ioannem Montanum et Ulricum Neuber.Google Scholar
  16. Schöner, J. 1544. Observationes XXX annorum a I. Regiomontano et B. Walthero Norimbergae habitae. Nuremberg.Google Scholar
  17. Thucydides 1972 History of the Peloponnesian war. Trans. Rex Warner; with an introduction and notes by M.I. Finley. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  18. Vesalius 1543. De humanis corporis fabrica (Basel: ex oficina Ioannis Oporini)Google Scholar

Secondary Literature

  1. Arnheim, R. 1974. Art and visual perception. In A psychology of the creative eye. Berkeley: The University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barrera-Osorio, A. 2006. Experiencing nature. The Spanish American empire and the early scientific revolution. Austin: Texas University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baxandall, M. 1977. Giotto and the orators. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Belting, H. 2010. Spiegel der Welt. Die Erfindung des Gemäldes in der Niederlandern. Münich: Hirmer Verlag.Google Scholar
  5. Canfora, L. 2014. La crisi dell’utopia. Aristofane contro Platone. Rome-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
  6. De Martino, E. 2013. Sud e Magia. Feltrinelli: Milan.Google Scholar
  7. de Vries, J. 2008. The industrious revolution. Consumer behavior and the household economy, 1650 to the present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dear, P. 1995. Discipline and experience. The mathematical way in the scientific revolution. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dupré, S. 2005. Introduction. The Hockney–Falco thesis: Constraints and opportunities. Early Science and Medicine 10 (2): 125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elliott, J. 2006. Empires of the Atlantic world: Britain and Spain in America 1492–1830. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Febre, L., and H.J. Martin. 1958. L’aparition du livre. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
  12. Foucault, M. 1966. Les mots et les choses. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  13. Ginzburg, C. 1976. The cheese and the worms. The cosmos of a sixteenth-century miller. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Ginzburg, C. 1983. The night battles: Witchcraft & Agrarian cults in the sixteenth & seventeenth centuries. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gombrich, E. 1960. Art and illusion. A study in the psychology of pictorial representation. New York: Phaidon.Google Scholar
  16. Grafton, A. 1995. New worlds, ancient texts : The power of tradition and the shock of discovery. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Grafton, A. 2000. Leon Battista Alberti: Master builder of the Italian renaissance. New York: Hill & Wang.Google Scholar
  18. Gramsci, A. 1991. Prison notebooks. 3 vols. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hanson, N.R. 1958. Patterns of discovery. Cambrdige: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hartog, F. 1988. The mirror of Herodotus: The representation of the other in the writing of history. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hockney, D. 2006. Secret knowledge: Rediscovering the lost techniques of the old masters. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  22. Koyré, A. 1973. The astronomical revolution: Copernicus, Kepler, Borelli. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  23. Kuhn, Th.S. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Kuhn, Th.S. 1977. The essential tension. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lévi-Strauss, C. 1987. Race et histoire. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  26. Nenci, G. 1953. Il motivo dell’autopsia nella storiografia greca. Studi Classici e Orientali 3: 14–46.Google Scholar
  27. Panofsky, E. 1991. Perspective as symbolic form. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  28. Park, C. 2011. Observation in the margins 500 – 1500. In Histories of scientific observation, ed. Lorraine Daston and Elisabeth Lunbeck, 15–44. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  29. Pomata, G. 2011. Observation rising: Birth of an Epystemic genre 1500–1650. In Histories of scientific observation, ed. Lorraine Daston and Elisabeth Lunbeck, 45–80. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Rossi, P. 2007. Il tempo dei maghi. Rinascimento e modernità. Milan: Raffaello Cortina.Google Scholar
  31. Rubiès, J.-P. 2007. Travellers and cosmographers. Studies in the history of early modern travel and ethnology. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  32. Schechner, S.J. 2005. Between knowing and doing: Mirrors and their imperfections in the renaissance. Early Science and Medicine 10 (2): 137–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Siraisi, N. 2007. History, medicine and the tradition of renaissance learning. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Viveiros de Castro, E. 2014. Cannibal Metaphysics. Univocal Publications. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  35. Wittgenstein, L. 1991. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pompeu Fabra UniversityBarcelonaSpain

Section editors and affiliations

  • Matteo Valleriani
    • 1
  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for the History of ScienceBerlinGermany