Abstract
Medieval natural philosophy proper, i.e., philosophia naturalis, was concerned with understanding natural motion and change, understood in the broadest forms; it was anchored primarily to Aristotle’s Physica, De caelo, De generatione et corruptione, and De animalibus. These Aristotelian texts and their textual traditions did not relay on graphic arguments or visual representations. Over the course of the Renaissance, the intellectual and cultural boundaries, investigative domain, and methods of natural philosophy were transformed by the expansion of subalternated disciplines, including anatomy, botany, and mechanics. Because these disciplines made extensive use of illustrations, the epistemic value of visual representation became important and images served both as representations of the evidence and as demonstrations. During the sixteenth century, a second factor that supported a new function for images in science developed from the philosophical controversy about the status of geometrical proofs and mathematical knowledge more generally, known as the quaestio de certitudine mathematicarum. The ground for the transformation of natural philosophy during the sixteenth century and the new role to be played by illustrations within it was prepared during the fifteenth century by the rise of what Alexandre Koyré called a mentalité visuelle. Specifically, technical drawings and the language of disegno acquired currency at court; graphic apparata were devised for recently recovered and newly edited classical scientific treatises, as epitomized by Ptolemy’s Cosmographia; finally, mathematical humanists made mathematical sciences fashionable for courtiers, at a time when the printing press canonized illustrations as text, contributing to shaping of a new intellectual culture.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Primary Literature
Dal Monte, Guidobaldo. 1577. Mechanicorum liber. Pesaro: Girolamo Concordia.
Euclides. 1482. Elementorum liber. Venice: Erhard Ratdolt.
Fuchs, Leonhart. 1542. De historia stirpium. Basel: Michael Isengrin.
Galilei, Galileo. 1623. Il Saggiatore. Rome: Giacomo Mascardi.
Regiomontanus, Johannes (Johann Müller of Königsberg). 1473–1474. Bücheranzeige. Nuremberg: Johann Müller of Königsberg.
Vesalius, Andrea. 1543. De humani corporis fabrica libri septem. Basel: Johann Opirinus.
Secondary Literature
Baigrie, Brian, ed. 1996. Picturing knowledge: Historical and philosophical problems concerning the use of art in science. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Baldasso, Renzo. 2006. The figures of the scientific revolution: A historiographic inquiry. Centaurus 48: 69–88.
Carlino, Andrea. 1995. Knowe Thyself: Graphic communication and anatomical knowledge in early modern Europe. Res 27: 52–69.
Crowther, Kathleen, and Peter Barker. 2013. Training the intelligent eye understanding illustrations in early modern astronomy texts. Isis 104: 429–470.
Egmond, Florike. 2017. Eye for detail: Images of plants and animals in art and science, 1500–1630. London: Reaktion Books.
Fischel, Angela. 2010. Collections, images and form in sixteenth-century natural history. Intellectual History Review 20: 147–164.
Freedberg, David. 2003. The eye of the lynx: Galileo, his friends and the beginnings of modern natural history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Givens, Jean, Karen Reeds, and Alain Touwaide, eds. 2006. Visualizing medieval medicine and natural history, 1220–1550. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Kusukawa, Sachiko. 2012. Picturing the book of nature: Image, text, and argument in sixteenth-century human anatomy and medical botany. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kusukawa, Sachiko, and Ian Maclean, eds. 2006. Transmitting knowledge: Words, images and instruments in early modern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lefèvre, Wolfgang, Jürgen Renn, and Urs Schoepflin, eds. 2003. The power of images in early modern science. Basel: Birkhäuse.
Lefèvre, Wolfang, et al., eds. 2004. Picturing machines, 1400–1700. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Long, Pamela. 2002. Objects of art/objects of nature: Visual representation and the investigation of nature. In Merchants and marvels: Commerce, science, and art in early modern Europe, ed. Pamela Smith and Paula Findlen, 63–82. New York: Routledge.
Lüthy, Christoph. 2009. Words, lines, diagrams, images: Toward a history of scientific imagery. Early Science and Medicine 14: 398–439.
Meroi, Fabrizio, and Claudio Pogliano, eds. 2001. Immagini per conoscere: Dal Rinascimento alla rivoluzione scientifica. Florence: Olschki.
Moser, Stephanie. 2014. Making expert knowledge through the image: Connections between antiquarian and early modern scientific illustration. Isis 105: 58–99.
Ogilvie, Brian. 2006. The science of describing: Natural history in renaissance Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Reeves, Eileen. 1997. Painting the heavens: Art and science in the age of Galileo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Renn, Jurgen, ed. 2000. Galileo in context. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Shirley, John, and David Hoeniger, eds. 1985. Science and the arts in the renaissance. Washington, DC: Folger Books.
Smith, Pamela. 2006. Art, science, and visual culture in early modern Europe. Isis 97: 83–100.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Baldasso, R. (2018). Images in Renaissance Science, Function of. In: Sgarbi, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_933-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_933-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities