Skip to main content

Homocentrism

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy
  • 215 Accesses

Abstract

Homocentrism is that philosophical tendency which centers itself upon man as a finite subject who dominates his own history. According to an influent albeit antiquate historiographical position which traces back to J. Burckhardt, Renaissance is the age of homocentrism and of first individualization of singular personalities with flourishing characters par excellence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baricalla, Vilma. 2000. L’uomo, la bestia, i cieli: critiche all’antropocentrismo nel Sei-Settecento. Pisa: ETS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, Hans. 1969. Critica dell’“individualismo” burkhardtiano: elementi politici e sociali nel concetto di Rinascimento. Il pensiero politico 2: 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biancu, Stefano. 2006. Antropocentrismo. In Enciclopedia Filosofica, 525–527. Bompiani: Milano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borinski, Karl. 1919. Die Weltwiedergeburtsidee in den neueren Zeiten, I: Der Streit um die Renaissance und die Entstehungsgeschichte der historischen Beziehungsbegriffe Renaissance und Mittel-alter. München: Akademie der Wissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burckhardt, Jacob. 1860. Die Cultur der Renaissance in Italien. Basel: Schweighauser. First Engl. transl. S.G.C. Middlemore. 1878. The civilization of the Renaissance in Italy. Vienna/New York: The Phaidon Press/Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, Peter. 1997. Representations of the self from petrarch to descartes. In Rewriting the self: Histories from the Renaissance to the present, ed. Roy Porter, 17–28. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butchvarov, Panayot. 2015. Anthropocentrism in philosophy. Realism, antirealism, semirealism. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, Ernst. 1927. Individuum und Kosmos in der Philosophie der Renaissance. Leipzig/Berlin: B. G. Teubner. Transl. and introd. Mario Domandi. 2000 (1963). The individual and the cosmos in Renaissance philosophy. Mineola: Dover Publ.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chabod, Federico. 1933. Il Rinascimento nelle recenti interpretazioni. Bulletin of the International Committee of Historical Sciences V, part. II (19): 215–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chabod, Federico. 1936. Rinascimento. In Enciclopedia italiana di scienze, lettere ed arti, vol. XXIX, 346–354. Roma: Istituto della Enciclopedia italiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chabod, Federico. 1942. Il Rinascimento. In Problemi storici e orientamenti storiografici, Raccolta di studi, ed. Ettore Rota, 445–491. Como: Cavalleri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chabod, Federico. 1948. Il Rinascimento. In Questioni di storia moderna, ed. Ettore Rota, 53–99. Milano: Marzorati.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chabod, Federico. 1964. Il Rinascimento. In Nuove questioni di storia moderna, vol. I, 167–203. Milano: Marzorati.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chabod, Federico. 1967. Scritti sul Rinascimento. Torino: Einaudi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, William J., ed. 2002. Society & individual in renaissance Florence. Berkeley: The University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garin, Eugenio. 1938. La dignitas hominis e la letteratura patristica. La Rinascita 4: 102–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garin, Eugenio. 1994. Giovanni Pico della Mirandola, Oratio De hominis dignitate. Pordenone: Edizione Studio Tesi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenblatt, Stephen. 1980. Renaissance self-fashioning: More to Shakespeare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guervich, Aaron. 1995. The origins of European individualism. Trans. K. Judelson. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, Robin. 2002. The European renaissance, 1400–1600. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemert, Charles C. 1979. Sociology and the twilight of man. Homocentrism and discourse in sociological theory. Carbondale/Edwardsville: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane, Alan, and Gerry Martin. 2002. Glass. A world history. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, John Jeffries. 2004. Myths of renaissance individualism. Houndmills/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the self: The making of modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todescan, Franco. 1985. Dal cosmocentrismo classico all’antropocentrismo moderno. Appunti di antropologia filosofica. Grisignano di Zocco: ed. del Rezzara.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matteo Cosci .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Cosci, M. (2018). Homocentrism. In: Sgarbi, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_928-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_928-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics