Abstract
While vernacular epic poetry is a comparatively well-studied field, the following entry will focus on Neo-Latin epic poetry from the early modern period. In general, epic poetry was a thriving literary genre throughout the early modern period, understood here as the period from the fourteenth to eighteenth century, and this was the case not only in terms of quantity: In contemporary poetical treatises epic maintained supremacy over all other poetic genres. It was used regularly to praise rulers and noble families, cities, or institutions. The main function of these panegyric poems was to legitimize and ennoble their hero and to develop a universally valid narrative for them. The authors of these texts often also used them as a means to seek patronage. While at the outset of the Renaissance, epic poems were written in Latin, from the later fifteenth century onwards heroic poetry was also composed in different vernacular languages, and formed the basis for a rich vernacular tradition. The subjects of these poems were historical, mythical, and religious. Formally there exists a wide variety within the genre ranging from extensive poems consisting of several books to short epics and from supplements to centos. By using the special features of epic (e.g., similes, speeches, catalogues), the poets made themselves part of the epic tradition. This tradition in itself had a considerable impact on the way in which a specific depiction was realized: Many heroic figures are constructed on the model of Aeneas, heroines after Dido and formidable opponents exhibit features of Turnus – just to stress the comparison with Virgil’s Aeneid. After the eighteenth century, other literary forms took over the function of epic poetry, which became obsolete because of social and political changes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Belloni, Antonio. 1912. Il poema epico e mitologico. Milano: Vallardi.
Binns, James. 1997. Abraham Hartwell, Herald of the new Queen’s reign. The Regina Literata (London 1565). In Ut granum sinapis: Essays on Neo-Latin literature in honour of Jozef IJsewijn, ed. Gilbert Tournoy and Dirk Sacré, 292–304. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
Borinski, Karl. 1886. Das Epos der Renaissance. Vierteljahrbuch für Kultur und Literatur der Renaissance 1: 187–205.
Borris, Kenneth. 2000. Allegory and epic in English Renaissance literature: Heroic form in Sidney, Spenser, and Milton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
De Keyser, Jeroen. 2015. Francesco Filelfo and Francesco Sforza: Critical edition of Filelfo’s “Sphortias”, “De Genuensium deditione”, “Oratio parentalis” and his polemical exchange with Galeotto Marzio. Hildesheim/Zürich/New York: Olms.
Faini, Marco. 2015. La poetica dell’epica sacra tra Cinque e Seicento in Italia. The Italianist 35: 27–60.
Hardie, Philip. 1993. The epic successors of Virgil. A study in the dynamics of a tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haye, Thomas. 2009. Francesco Rococciolo’s Mutineis: Interpretation und Kommentar. Hildesheim/Zürich/New York: Olms.
Hofmann, Heinz. 2001. Von Africa über Bethlehem nach America: Das Epos in der neulateinischen Literatur. In Von Göttern und Menschen erzählen: Formkonstanzen und Funktionswandel vormoderner Epik, ed. Jörg Rüpke, 130–182. Stuttgart: Steiner.
IJsewijn, Jozef. 1998. Companion to Neo-Latin studies: Literary, linguistic, philological and editorial questions. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
Jossa, Stefano. 2002. La fondazione di un genere: Il poema eroico tra Ariosto e Tasso. Rome: Carocci.
Kallendorf, Craig. 2007. The other Virgil: Pessimistic readings of the Aeneid in early modern culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Klecker, Elisabeth. 2002. Tradition und Moderne im Dienst des Herrscherlobes: Beispiele lateinischer Panegyrik für Maria Theresia. In Strukturwandel kultureller Praxis, ed. Franz Eybl, 233–247. Vienna: WUV Universitäts-Verlag.
Lippincott, Kristen. 1989. The Neo-Latin historical epics of the North Italian courts: An examination of ‘Courtly Culture’ in the fifteenth century. Renaissance Studies 3: 415–428.
Maskell, David. 1973. The historical epic in France 1500–1700. London: Oxford University Press.
Murrin, Michael. 1994. History and warfare in Renaissance epic. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Pantaleon, Candidus. 2008. In Gotiberis (1587), ed. Georg Burkard. Heidelberg: Manutius Verlag.
Petrarca, Francesco. 1999. In Epistolae familiares XXIV: Vertrauliche Briefe, ed. Florian Neumann. Mainz: Dieterich.
Quint, David. 1993. Epic and empire: Politics and generic form from Virgil to Milton. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rolfes, Susanne. 2001. Die lateinische Poetik des Marco Girolamo Vida und ihre Rezeption bei Julius Caesar Scaliger. München: Saur.
Sacchi, Guido. 2006. Fra Ariosto e Tasso. Vicende del poema narrativo; con un’appendice di studi cinque-secenteschi. Pisa: Edizioni della Normale.
Usher, Philip John. 2014. Epic arts in Renaissance France. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Warner, J. Christopher. 2005. The Augustinian epic: Petrarch to Milton. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Schaffenrath, F. (2018). Neo-Latin Epic. In: Sgarbi, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_852-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_852-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities