Skip to main content

Organism

Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy
  • 39 Accesses

Abstract

Since antiquity, living beings have been defined as organic bodies able to perform certain complex activities, including nourishment, growth, and reproduction. These activities, or basic organic functions, were attributed to the soul and its parts. According to ancient physiological theory, the soul is linked to the organization of the body, but is not a direct cause or result of it. Renaissance authors adopted this view of the soul as the principle of life. In various instances they emphasized the interaction and interdependence of the organic parts as the precondition for the performance of typical activities. Such an explanation was often achieved by comparing the body of a living being with the cosmic order, complex artifacts, man-made constructions, or the interaction between individuals in social groups. By stressing the interdependence of parts as well as the resulting functional closure as the scientific foundation of understanding and explaining organic systems, Renaissance conceptual models have paved the way for a materialistic and at the same time holistic understanding of living beings as organisms, which was then consolidated during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Primary Literature

  • Bos, A.P. 2003. The Soul and its Instrumental Body. A Reinterpretation of Aristotle's Philosophy of Living Nature. Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno, G. 1584. Spaccio de la bestia trionfante, Epistola esplicatoria. In G. Aquilecchia, ed. Å’uvres complètes, vol. V/1. Paris; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. 1632. Traité de l’homme. In C. Adam and P. Tannery, eds. Å’uvres de Descartes, vol. XI, 119–202. Paris; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. 1649. Les passions de l’ame. In C. Adam and P. Tannery, eds. Å’uvres de Descartes, vol. XI, 291–497. Paris; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Digby, K. 1644. Two treatises in the one of which the nature of bodies, in the other, the nature of man’s soul is looked into. Paris: John Williams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ficino, M. 1469. De amore. Engl. S. Jayne, transl. Commentary on Plato’s Symposium on Love. Columbia; 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fracastoro, G. 1550. De sympathia & antipathia rerum liber primus. De contagione et contagiosis morbis & eorum curatione, libri tres. Lugduni.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, W. 1628. Exercitatio anatomica de motu cordis et sanguinis in animalibus. Francofurti.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungius, J. 1662. Doxoscopiae physicae minores. Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. 1689/1700. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. P.H. Nidditch. Oxford; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malebranche, N. 1675. De la recherche de la vérité, vol. 2. Paris; 1721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsilius of Padua. 1324. Defensor pacis, ed. H. Kusch. Berlin; 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scaliger, J.C. 1557. Exotericarum exercitationum liber xv. Lutetiae.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas Aquinas. 1266–1273. Summa theologiae. In: R. Busa, ed. Opera omnia, vol. 2, 184–926. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesalius, A. 1543. De humani corporis fabrica. Basileae.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Literature

  • Blank, A. 2010. Biomedical ontology and the metaphysics of composite substances 1540–1670. Munich: Philosophia Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, T. 2006. From the organism of a body to the body of an organism: Occurrence and meaning of the word ‘organism’ from the seventeenth to the nineteenth centuries. British Journal for the History of Science 39: 319–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchesneau, F. 1998. Les modèles du vivant de Descartes à Leibniz. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, R.E. 1973. Galen on psychology, psychopathology, and function and diseases of the nervous system. Basel: Karger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J.E.H. (ed.). 2006. The problem of animal generation in early modern philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georg Toepfer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Toepfer, G. (2015). Organism. In: Sgarbi, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_76-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_76-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Organism in Renaissance Sciences
    Published:
    15 October 2019

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_76-2

  2. Original

    Organism
    Published:
    26 December 2015

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_76-1