Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy

Living Edition
| Editors: Marco Sgarbi

Tartaret, Pierre

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_657-1

Abstract

Pierre Tartaret (d. 1522) was a philosopher and theologian active at the University of Paris during the late fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries. His oeuvre primarily consists of commentaries on school authors (Aristotle, Peter Lombard, and Peter of Spain), whom he explained according to the doctrines of Duns Scotus or fourteenth-century nominalists such as John Buridan and Albert of Saxony. His commentaries on logic and natural philosophy, in particular, had a remarkable fortuna and were reprinted until well into the seventeenth century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

Primary Literature

  1. See Lohr (1972: 372–376), Pettegree and Walsby (2012: 1513–1514) and Weijers (2007: 233–238) for a more detailed overview.Google Scholar
  2. Tartaret, Pierre. 1493a. Enarrationes in universam Aristotelis logicam. Poitiers: Jean Bouyer and Guillaume Bouchet.Google Scholar
  3. Tartaret, Pierre. 1493b. Expositio et quaestiones super totam philosophiam naturalem et metaphysicam Aristotelis. Poitiers: Jean Bouyer and Guillaume Bouchet.Google Scholar
  4. Tartaret, Pierre. 1493c. Tractatus de intensione, rarefactione et condensatione formarum utilis ad totam physicam intelligendam extractus a Gregorio de Heremino et aliis doctoribus. Paris: André Bocard.Google Scholar
  5. Tartaret, Pierre. 1494a. Commentarii in magistrum Petrum Hispanum cum tractatibus consequentiarum et sophismatum insertis et tractatibus insolubilium et de descensu … et insuper tractatus obligatorium. Freiburg: s.n.Google Scholar
  6. Tartaret, Pierre. 1494b. Quaestiones quatuor librorum Sententiarum Scoti. Paris: s.n.Google Scholar
  7. Tartaret, Pierre. 1496. Quaestiones super libros I-VI Ethicorum. Paris: Jean Lambert.Google Scholar
  8. Tartaret, Pierre. 1504. Quaestiones morales in octo capita distinctae. Paris: Geoffroy de Marnef.Google Scholar
  9. Tartaret, Pierre. 1519. Quaestiones quodlibetales familiarissime reportatae. Paris: Pierre Gromors.Google Scholar
  10. Tartaret, Pierre. 1520. In quartum Sententiarum Scoti dictata. Paris: Claude Chevallon and Pierre Gromors.Google Scholar

Secondary Literature

  1. Andersen, Claus. 2016. Metaphysik im Barockscotismus. Untersuchungen zum Metaphysikwerk des Bartholomaeus Mastrius. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashworth, Earline J. 1974. Language and logic in the post-medieval period. Dordrecht/Boston: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bäck, Allan. 1996. On reduplication. Logical theories of qualification. Leiden/New York/Köln: Brill.Google Scholar
  4. Bowen, Barbara C. 2011. Laughing in Rabelais, Laughing with Rabelais. In The Cambridge companion to Rabelais, ed. John O’Brien, 31–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Demonet, Marie-Luce. 1999. Le signe écrit dans les commentaires scotistes de Pierre Tartaret. Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 83: 85–102.Google Scholar
  6. Duhem, Pierre. 1959. Le système du monde. Histoire des doctrines cosmologiques de Platon à Copernic. Tome X. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
  7. Ferreira, João. 1952. As Súmulas Logicais de Pedro Hispano e os seus comentadores. Colectanea de Estudos 3: 360–394.Google Scholar
  8. Forlivesi, Marco. 2002. Scotistarum princeps. Bartolomeo Mastri (1602–1673) e il suo tempo. Padova: Centro studi Antoniani.Google Scholar
  9. Giard, Luce. 1980. Pierre Crockaert lecteur de Pierre d’Espagne. In Logique et théologie au XVIe siècle. Aux sources de l’argumentation de Martin Bucer, ed. I. Backus, P. Fraenkel, L. Giard, P. Lardet, and W. Sparn, 3–26. Genève/Lausanne/Neuchâtel: Revue de théologie et de philosophie.Google Scholar
  10. Krieger, Gerhard. 1990. Homo supponit simpliciter pro natura. Der Zusammenhang von Logik und Metaphysik im spätmittelalterlichen Scotismus (Petrus Tartaretus). In Knowledge and the Sciences in Medieval Philosophy. Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of Medieval Philosophy (S.I.E.P.M.), Helsinki 24–29 August 1987. Volume II, ed. Simo Knuuttila, Reijo Työrinoja, and Sten Ebbesen, 521–534. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino.Google Scholar
  11. Lohr, Charles H. 1972. Medieval Latin Aristotle Commentaries. Authors: Narcissus – Richardus. Traditio 28: 281–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Marrone, Francesco. 2008. Descartes e la tradizione scotista. Gli antecedenti storici della nozione di realitas obiectiva. Quaestio 8: 279–302.Google Scholar
  13. Meier-Oeser, Stephan. 1997. Die Spur des Zeichens. Das Zeichen und seine Funktion in der Philosophie des Mittelalters und der frühen Neuzeit. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Müller, Sigrid. 2013. From virtue ethics to normative ethics? Tracing paradigm shifts in fifteenth-century commentaries on the Nicomachean ethics. In Between creativity and norm-making. Tensions in the later Middle Ages and the early modern era, ed. Sigrid Müller and Cornelia Schweiger, 9–30. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  15. Nuchelmans, Gabriel. 1980. Late scholastic and humanist theories of the proposition. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  16. Ong, Walter J. 1958. Ramus, method, and the decay of dialogue. From the art of discourse to the art of reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Pettegree, Andrew, and Malcolm Walsby. 2012. Books published in France before 1601 in Latin and Languages other than French. Volume II. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  18. Pozzo, Riccardo. 1998. Die Etablierung des naturwissenschaftlichen Unterrichts unter dem Einfluss Melanchthons. In Melanchthon und die Naturwissenschaften seiner Zeit, ed. Günther Frank and Stefan Rhein, 273–287. Sigmaringen: Jan Thorbecke.Google Scholar
  19. Prantl, Carl. 1870. Geschichte der Logik im Abendlande. Vierter Band. Leipzig: S. Hirzel.Google Scholar
  20. Sullivan, Thomas. 2011. Parisian licentiates in theology, AD 1373–1500: A biographical register. Volume II: The secular clergy. Leiden/Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Villoslada, Ricardo G. 1938. La universidad de Paris durante los estudios de Francisco de Vitoria O.P. (1507–1522). Rome: Pontificia Università Gregoriana.Google Scholar
  22. Wegerich, Erich. 1942. Bio-bibliografische Notizen über Franziskanerlehrer des 15. Jahrhunderts. Franziskanische Studien 29: 150–197.Google Scholar
  23. Weijers, Olga. 2007. Le travail intellectuel à la Faculté des arts de Paris: textes et maîtres (ca. 1200–1500). Volume VII: Répertoire des noms commençant par P. Turnhout: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zahnd, Ueli. 2014. Wirksame Zeichen? Sakramentenlehre und Semiotik in der Scholastik des ausgehenden Mittelalters. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ArtsKatholieke Universiteit LeuvenLeuvenBelgium