Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy

Living Edition
| Editors: Marco Sgarbi

Humanism

  • Timothy KircherEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_584-1

Abstract

This entry examines the humanist articulation of three key philosophical relations: being and seeming, virtue and fortune, and stasis and mutability. These relations address matters of epistemology (knowing), ethics, and ontology (reality). Humanists, when grappling with these concerns, resorted to alternative approaches. They identified reality on the basis of the stability of reason, which could ground an objective view of things. In this sense, they became finders of wisdom. Or, as seekers of wisdom, they acknowledged the transience of phenomena, which they confronted in their awareness of illusion and limited vision. If they grounded their role as objective expositors of the truth of things on the traditional concept of the animal rationale, they also celebrated the new force of the homo ludens, the philosopher at play, who participates in the unveiling of reality through masking and seeming, and also intersubjectively, through conversations with others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

Primary Sources

  1. Alberti, Leon Battista. 1960–73. Opere volgari. 3 vols. Edited by C. Grayson. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
  2. Alberti, Leon Battista. 2003a. Intercenales. Edited and translated by F. Bacchelli and L. D’Ascia. Bologna: Pendragon.Google Scholar
  3. Alberti, Leon Battista. 2003b. Momus. Edited and translated by S. Knight and V. Brown. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Boccaccio, Giovanni. 1992. Decameron. Edited by V. Branca. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
  5. Boccaccio, Giovanni. 2011. Geneaology of the Pagan Gods. Edited and translated by J. Solomon. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bracciolini, Poggio. 1993. In De varietate fortunae, ed. O. Merisalo. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.Google Scholar
  7. Bracciolini, Poggio. 2008. Contra hypocritas, ed. D. Canfora. Rome: Edizioni di storia e letteratura.Google Scholar
  8. Bruni, Leonardo. 1928. In Humanistisch-philosophische Schriften, ed. H. Baron. Wiesbaden: Sändig.Google Scholar
  9. Bruni, Leonardo. 1996. Opere letterarie e politiche. Edited by P. Viti. Turin: Unione Tipografico-Editrice Torinese.Google Scholar
  10. Castiglione, Baldassare. 1987. Il libro del cortegiano. Edited by G. Carnazzi. Milan: Biblioteca Universale Rizzoli.Google Scholar
  11. Cusa, Nicholas. 1985. Nicholas of Cusa’s Dialectical Mysticism: Text, Translation, and Interpretive Study of the ‘De visione Dei.’ Edited and translated by J. Hopkins. Minneapolis: Banning Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cusa, Nicholas. Opera. http://www.cusanus-portal.de/content/fw.php?werk=23&fw=1. Accessed 21 Mar 2016.
  13. Da Castiglionchio, Lapo, the Younger. Epistolario, MS Biblioteca apostolica vaticana, Ottob.lat. 1677, cc. 133–229.Google Scholar
  14. Erasmus, Desiderius. 1969. The Praise of Folly. Trans. H.H. Hudson. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Ficino, Marsilio. 1975. The Philebus Commentary. Edited and translated by M.J.B. Allen. Berkeley.Google Scholar
  16. Ficino, Marsilio. 1985. Letters. 3 vols. New York: Gingko Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ficino, Marsilio. 2006. Platonic Theology, vol. 2. Edited by J. Hankins and trans. M.J.B. Allen. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  18. Filelfo, Francesco. 2013. On Exile. Edited by J. de Keyser and translated by W.S. Blanchard. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Guicciardini, Francesco. 2013. Ricordi. Edited by C. Varotti. Rome: Carocci.Google Scholar
  20. Landino, Cristoforo. 1980. Disputationes camaldulenses. Edited by P. Lohe. Florence: Sansoni.Google Scholar
  21. Luther, Martin. 1883–1929. Werke: Kritische Gesamtausgabe, 73 vols. Weimar.Google Scholar
  22. Machiavelli, Niccolò. 2006. Il principe. Edited by M. Martelli and N. Marcelli. Rome: Salerno Editrice.Google Scholar
  23. della Mirandola, Pico. 2012. Oration on the Dignity of Man: A New Translation and Commentary. Edited by F. Borghesi, M. Papio, and M. Riva. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Montaigne, Michele de. 1943. Essays. Trans. D. Frame. Stanford: Standford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Montaigne, Michele de. 1998. Essais. Edited by A. Tournon. Paris: Imprimerie nationale.Google Scholar
  26. Palmieri, Matteo. 1982. Vita civile. Edited by G. Belloni. Florence, Sansoni.Google Scholar
  27. Petrarch, Francesco. 1958. De Otio Religioso. Edited by G. Rotondi. Vatican City: Apostolica Vaticana.Google Scholar
  28. Petrarch, Francesco. 1996a. Canzoniere. Edited by M. Musa. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Petrarch, Francesco. 1996b. Trionfi; Rime estravaganti; Codice degli abbozzi. Edited by V. Pacca and L. Paolino. Milan: Mondadori.Google Scholar
  30. Petrarch, Francesco. 2003. Invectives. Edited and translated by D. Marsh. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Petrarch, Francesco. De remediis utriusque fortune.Google Scholar
  32. Pontano, Giovanni Gioviano. 2012. Dialogues, Vol. 1. Edited and translated by J.H. Gaisser. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Rabelais, François. 1994. Oeuvres complètes. Edited by M. Huchon and F. Moreau. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  34. Salutati, Coluccio. 1951. De laboribus Herculis, 2 vols. Edited by B.L. Ullman. Zurich: Thesaurus Mundi Abaris.Google Scholar
  35. Valla, Lorenzo. 1977. On Pleasure / De voluptate. Edited and translated by A. K. Hieatt and M. Lorch. New York.Google Scholar
  36. Vives, Juan Luis. 1551. De disciplinis libri XX. Lyon.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Black, Robert. 1998. Humanism. In The New Cambridge Medieval History, ed. C. Allmand. Cambridge, 7:243–277.Google Scholar
  2. Cassirer, Ernst. 1927. Individuum und Kosmos in der Philosophie der Renaissance. Berlin, Tuebner.Google Scholar
  3. Celenza, Christopher. 2004. The Lost Italian Renaissance: Humanists, Historians, and Latin’s Legacy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cox, Virginia. 1992. The Renaissance Dialogue: Literary Dialogue in its Social and Political Contexts. Cambridge: Castiglione to Galileo.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Garin, Eugenio. 2005. Quale ‘Umanesimo’? (Divagazioni storiche). Giornale critico della filosofia italiana 84:16–26.Google Scholar
  6. Garin, Eugenio. 2010. La cultura del Rinascimento: Profilo storico. Rome: Laterza.Google Scholar
  7. Grassi, Ernesto. 2001. Rhetoric as Philosophy: The Humanist Tradition. Edited and translated by J.M. Krois and A. Azodi. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hankins, James, ed. 2007. The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Humanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Huizinga, Johan. 1950. Homo ludens: A Study of the Play Element in Culture. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  10. Kristeller, Paul Oskar. 1979. Renaissance Thought and its Sources. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Nauta, Lodi. 2009. In Defense of Common Sense: Lorenzo Valla’s Humanist Critique of Scholastic Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Struever, Nancy. 1970. The Language of History in the Renaissance: Rhetoric and Historical Consciousness in Florentine Humanism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Zorzi Pugliese, Olga. 1995. Il discorso labirintico del dialogo rinascimentale. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Guilford CollegeGreensboroUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Teodoro Katinis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Literary StudiesGhent UniversityGhentBelgium