Abstract
“Scientia” is a long-standing heritage of Aristotelian logic and denotes an epistemic ideal pursued through several centuries. According to Aristotle’s (1984) Posterior Analytics, knowledge that conforms to this ideal must consist of propositions that are universally and necessarily true. This necessity can be demonstrated through syllogistic inferences that proceed from premises containing the cause of the conclusion. Accordingly, scientia consisted in a systematic, demonstrative presentation of why things behave the way they do, and not in the discovery of the causes from which demonstrations followed. This ideal started to erode in the Renaissance period. Its various aspects had been challenged and alternative ideals of inquiry had been proposed. As the emphasis shifted from the demonstration of phenomena in accordance with Aristotelian logic and metaphysics to the production of useful knowledge and the standards of intelligibility changed, the idea of scientia would be gradually abandoned. Syllogistic inference had been increasingly criticized as incapable of producing useful knowledge, and explanations that appealed to Aristotelian essences started to be perceived as empty or unintelligible. The increasing commitment to observation and experimental practices and an ensuing “culture of fact” replaced the conviction that in natural philosophy there is room only for universally and necessary true propositions, and the development and usefulness of mathematical practices shed doubt on syllogism as the only way through which demonstrative certainty could be achieved.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Primary Literature
Aquinas, Thomas. 1967. In Summa theologiae (Blackfriars Edition), Vol. 10: Cosmogony, ed. and trans: William. A. Wallace. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Aquinas, Thomas. 1987. In Faith, reason and theology: Questions I–IV of his commentary on the De Trinitate of Boethius, (trans: Armand Maurer). Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
Aristotle, 1984. In Complete works, 2 Vols., ed. Jonathan Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Augustine, 1958. In On Christian doctrine (trans: Robertson, D.W.). Indianapolis: Hackett.
Bacon, F. 1609. Historia naturalis et experimentalis ad condendam philosophiam: sive Phenomena Universi. In The Oxford Francis Bacon, Vol. 6: Philosophical studies, ed. G. Rees, c.1611–c.1619. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Catena, P. 1563. Oratio pro idea methodi ad nobilem Federicum Sforciam. Padua: apud Gratiosum Perchacinum.
Dee, J. 1570. The mathematicall praeface to elements of geometrie of Euclid of Megara. London: John Daye.
Descartes, R. 1644. The principles of philosophy. In The philosophical works of Descartes, Vol. 1, ed. J. Cottingham, R., and D. Murdoch Stoothoff. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
Ficino, M. 1989. In Three books on life, ed. Carol V. Kaske and John R. Clark. Binghamton: MRTS.
Galileo, G. 1610. Sidereus nuntius. In Le Opere de Galileo Galilei, Vol. 3/1, ed. A. Favaro, Florence, 1892. = Sidereus Nuncius, or The sidereal messenger, ed. A. Van Helden. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.
Galileo, G. 1612. Lettera a Marco Velseri circa le macchie solari. In Le Opere de Galileo Galilei, Vol. 5, ed. A. Favaro. Florence, 1895. = On Sunspots: Galileo Galilei and Christoph Scheiner. E. Reeves – A. Van Helden. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.
Galileo, G. 1615. Lettera a madama Christina di Lorena granduchesa id Toscana. In Le Opere de Galileo Galilei, Vol. 5, ed. A. Favaro. Florence, 1895. In Discoveries and opinions of Galileo, ed. S. Drake, 173–216. New York: Doubleday, 1957.
Galileo, G. 1623. Il saggiatore. In Le Opere de Galileo Galilei, Vol. 6, ed. A. Favaro. Florence, 1896. In Discoveries and opinions of Galileo, ed. S. Drake, 237–238. New York: Doubleday, 1957.
Hume, D. 1739/1740. In A Treatise of human nature, ed. D.F. Norton and M. Norton. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Leibniz, G.W. 1666. Dissertatio de arte combinatoria. In Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, Berlin, 1923 VI 1. = Dissertation on the art of combinations, In Philosophical papers and letters, ed. L. E. Loemker, 73–84. Dordrecht.
Locke, J. 1690. In An essay concerning human understanding, ed. P. Nidditch. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975.
Newton, I. 1687/1713/1726. In The principia: Mathematical principles of natural philosophy (trans: Cohen, I.B., and Anne Whitman). Berkeley, 1999: University of California Press.
Newton, I. 1704/1706/1717/1721/1730. In Opticks, or a tretise of the reflections, refractions, inflections & colours of light. London: Dover Publications, 1952.
Secondary Literature
Armogathe, J-R. 2007. La nature du monde. Paris: PUF.
Biagioli, M. 2006. Galileo’s instruments of credit telescopes, images, secrecy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Blair, A.M. 2007. Organizations of knowledge. In The Cambridge companion to renaissance philosophy, ed. J. Hankins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blum, P.R. 2012. Studies on early modern aristotelianism. Leiden: Brill.
Buzon, Fr. de. 1998. Mathesis universalis. In La science classique, ed. M. Blay, and R. Halleux. Paris: Flammarion.
Cohen, F. 1994. The scientific revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cunningham, A. 1991. How the principia got its name; or, taking natural philosophy seriously. History of Science 29: 377–392.
Devries, K. 2006. Sites of military science and technology. In The Cambridge history of early modern science, ed. K. Park, and L. Daston. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Duhem, P. 1913–1959. In Systeme du monde, Histoire des doctrines cosmologiques, de Platon à Copernic. Paris: Hermann.
Eamon, W. 1994. Science and the secrets of nature: Books of secrets in medieval and early modern culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gaukroger, S. 2010. The emergence of a scientific culture: Science and the shaping of modernity 1210–1685. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Grant, E. 1996. The foundations of modern science in the middle ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Grant, E. 2001. God and reason in the middle ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Henry, J. 2009. Voluntarist theology at the origins of modern science: A response to Peter Harrison. History of Science 47: 79–113.
Jardine, N. 1988. Epistemology of the sciences. In The Cambridge history of renaissance philosophy, ed. Ch. B. Schmitt, et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Koyré, A. 1968. Metaphysics and measurement: Essays in scientific revolution. London: Chapman & Hall.
Kuhn, Th. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lindberg, David C. (ed.). 1978. Science in the middle ages. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lindberg, D. 1992. The beginnings of western science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lindberg, D., and R. Numbers (eds.). 1986. God and nature: Historical essays on the encounter between christianity and science. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lindberg, D., and M. H. Shank, (eds.). 2003. The Cambridge history of science. Vol. 2, Medieval science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lindberg, D., and R. Westman (eds.). 1990. Reappraisals of the scientific revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McMullin, E. 1997. Galileo on science and Scripture. In The Cambridge companion to Galileo, ed. P. Machamer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Merkel, I., and A. Debus (eds.). 1998. Hermeticism and the renaissance: Intellectual history and the occult in early modern Europe. Washington/London: Folger Books.
Popkin, R.H. 2003. The history of scepticism from Savonarola to Bayle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shapin, S. 1981. Of Gods and kings: Natural philosophy and politics in the Leibniz-Clarke Disputes. Isis 77: 187–215.
Shapin, S. 1996. The scientific revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Shapiro, B.J. 2000. A culture of fact – England 1550–1720. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.
Stein, H. Manuscript. 1990. Further considerations on Newton’s methods. http://www.strangebeautiful.com/other-texts/stein-further-consider-meth-newton.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2015.
Westman, R., and E. McGuire (eds.). 1977. Hermeticism and the scientific revolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Yates, F.A. 1968. The hermetic tradition in renaissance science. In Art, science and history in the renaissance, ed. Ch Singleton. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this entry
Cite this entry
Demeter, T., Láng, B., Schmal, D. (2015). Scientia. In: Sgarbi, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_266-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_266-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Scientia in the Renaissance, Concept of- Published:
- 17 October 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_266-2
-
Original
Scientia- Published:
- 04 February 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_266-1