Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy

Living Edition
| Editors: Marco Sgarbi

Harmony, Renaissance Conceptions of

  • Jacomien PrinsEmail author
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_228-2

Abstract

In music, “harmony” usually refers to two or more notes that simultaneously produce a pleasing sound. In ancient Greek music, however, from which the concept and term originate, “harmony” stands for a specific combination or juxtaposition of dissimilar or contrasting elements, for example, a higher and a lower note. By combining these disparate or conflicting elements, a unity or harmony arises (discordia concors, i.e., harmonious discord). In a narrower sense, the Greek science of harmonics refers to an extensively developed system of rules that governs relations between musical elements. These rules were intended to control consonance and dissonance, which are fundamental aspects of harmony. In a broader sense, “harmony” was used to explain unity and relationships in all kinds of natural and cultural phenomena by analogy with musical consonances and their proportions. These explanations together constitute the various theories of world harmony that were based on the Pythagorean-Platonic belief in a universe ordered by the same numerical proportions that produce musical consonances, or harmonies. The most powerful statement of this doctrine was found in the realm of cosmology, where the notion of the harmony of the spheres was used to designate the harmonious relationships between the planets governed by the proportionate speeds of their orbits or by their mutual distances. In the history of Western thought it was not so much the meaning of the term “harmony” that changed, but the material to which it was applied, resulting in ever-changing explanations of the concept in different cultural contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

Primary Literature

  1. Anselmi, Giorgio. 1961. De musica, ed. and comm. G. Massera. Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar
  2. Boethius. 1989. Fundamentals of music. Trans. introd. and annot. C. M. Bower, ed. C. V. Palisca. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cardano, Girolamo. 1966. Opera omnia. Facsimile reprint. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann.Google Scholar
  4. Cardano, Girolamo. 1973. Writings on music. Trans. and introd. C. A. Miller. Rome: American Institute of Musicology.Google Scholar
  5. Ficino, Marsilio. 1496. “Compendium in Timaeum”. In: Commentaria in Platonem. Florence. English edition: Ficino, Marsilio. Forthcoming. Marsilio Ficino: Commentary on the Timaeus (ed. and trans.: Prins, J. W.), I Tatti Renaissance Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Ficino, Marsilio.1480–1489. De vita libri tres. Florence. 1989. Three books on life. Ed. and trans. C. V. Kaske and J. R. Clark, Binghamton: Medieval & Renaissance Texts & Studies.Google Scholar
  7. Fludd, Robert. 1617. Utriusque cosmi maioris scilicet et minoris metaphysica, physica atque technica historia …. Oppenheim.Google Scholar
  8. Galilei, Vincenzo. 1589. Discorso intorno alle opera di Gioseffo Zarlino. In: Collezione di trattati e musiche antiche edite in facsimile. Bollettino bibliografico musicale. Repr. of Venice, 1991.Google Scholar
  9. Giorgi, Francesco. 1525. De harmonia mundi totius cantica tria. Venice; Italian edition: Zorzi (= Giorgi), Francesco. 2010. L’Armonia del Mondo (ed. and trans. Campanini, S.). Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
  10. Kepler, Johannes. 1940. Harmonice mundi (1619). In Gesammelte Werke/Johannes Kepler, ed. M. Caspar, vol. VI. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
  11. Kircher, Athanasius. 1999. Musurgia universalis (1650, Rome, 2 vols), facsimile ed. U. Scharlau. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
  12. Macrobius. 1952. Commentary on the Dream of Scipio (early fifth century). Trans., introd. and annot. W. H. Stahl. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Mersenne, Marin. 1623. Quaestiones celeberrimae in Genesim. Paris.Google Scholar
  14. Mersenne, Marin. 1965. Harmonie universelle (1636). Facsimile reprint. Paris: Centre national de la recherche scientifique.Google Scholar
  15. Patrizi, Francesco. 1591. Nova de universis philosophia. Ferrara; reprinted with variants: Venice, 1593.Google Scholar
  16. Pico Della Mirandola, Giovanni. 1973. Conclusiones sive theses (1486), ed. B. Kieszkowski. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
  17. Plato. 1937. Plato’s cosmology: The “Timaeus” of Plato. Trans. and comm. F. M. Cornford. London/New York: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co. and Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
  18. Quintilianus, Aristides. 1983. On music, in three books. Trans. and ed. T.J. Mathiesen. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Zarlino, Gioseffo. 1965. Istitutioni harmoniche (Venice, 1558). Facsimile reprint. Monuments of music and music literature in facsimile. Ser. 2;1 New York: Broude Bros.Google Scholar

Secondary Literature

  1. Gersh, S. 1996. Concord in discourse: Harmonics and semiotics in late classical and early medieval Platonism. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Godwin, J., ed. 1993. Harmony of the spheres: A sourcebook of the Pythagorean tradition in music. Rochester: Inner Traditions International.Google Scholar
  3. Haar, J. 1961. Musica mundana: Variations on a Pythagorean Theme. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  4. Haar, J. 1973–4. Pythagorean harmony of the universe. In Dictionary of the history of ideas, ed. P.P. Wiener, vol. IV, 38–42. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  5. Hammerstein, R. 1962. Die Musik der Engel: Untersuchungen zur Musikanschauung des Mittelalters. Berne: Francke.Google Scholar
  6. Heninger, S.K. Jr. 1974. Touches of sweet harmony: Pythagorean cosmology and Renaissance poetics. San Marino: Huntington Library.Google Scholar
  7. Hollander, J. 1961. The untuning of the sky: Ideas of music in English poetry, 1500–1700. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Palisca, C.V. 1985. Humanism in Italian Renaissance musical thought. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Prins, J.W. 2014. Echoes of an invisible world: Marsilio Ficino and Francesco Patrizi on cosmic order and music theory. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Prins, J.W. and M. Vanhaelen, ed. 2017. Sing aloud harmonious spheres: Renaissance conceptions of cosmic harmony, London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Rothman, A. 2012. Far from every strife: Kepler’s search for harmony in an age of discord. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Princeton University.Google Scholar
  12. Spitzer, L. 1963. Classical and Christian ideas of world harmony: Prolegomena to an interpretation of the word “Stimmung”. Baltimore: Hopkins.Google Scholar
  13. Tomlinson, G. 1993. Music in Renaissance magic: Toward a historiography of others. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Vendrix, P., ed. 2008. Music and mathematics in late medieval and early modern Europe. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  15. Walker, D.P. 1958. Spiritual and demonic magic from Ficino to Campanella. London: Warburg Institute.Google Scholar
  16. Walker, D.P. 1978. Studies in musical science in the late Renaissance. London: Warburg Institute.Google Scholar
  17. Wittkower, R. 1949. Architectural principles in the age of humanism. London: Warburg Institute. cop. 1973Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for the Study of the Renaissance/Institute of Advanced StudyUniversity of Warwick, IAS, Millburn HouseCoventryUK

Section editors and affiliations

  • Jill Kraye
    • 1
  1. 1.THE WARBURG INSTITUTELondonUK