Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy

Living Edition
| Editors: Marco Sgarbi

Hermes Trismegistus and Hermetism

  • Wouter J. HanegraaffEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_180-1

Abstract

The so-called philosophical Hermetica were written down in Egypt in the second to third centuries. They are concerned with philosophical and spiritual teachings about how to find salvation through the attainment of suprarational knowledge (gnosis). Western intellectuals during the Middle Ages had access only to the Latin Asclepius, and the core teachings of this tradition were no longer understood. They became available again during the second half of the fifteenth century, when manuscripts of the Corpus Hermeticum reached Italy from Byzantium and were translated into Latin by Marsilio Ficino (C.H. I–XIV) and Lodovico Lazzarelli (C.H. XVI–XVIII). According to a highly influential but now discredited narrative created by Frances A. Yates since the 1960s, this led to a “Hermetic tradition” represented by major Renaissance intellectuals such as Ficino, Giovanni Pico della Mirandola, and Giordano Bruno. In fact, none of these thinkers can be properly described as “Hermeticists” or adherents of a “Hermetic philosophy”: most of them are more appropriately labeled “Platonic Orientalists” with a special interest in ancient Egyptian, Persian, or Hebrew wisdom (attributed, respectively, to Hermes, Zoroaster, or Moses). The true story of Renaissance Hermetism is considerably more modest but fascinating on its own terms. Its central representative was the relatively unknown poet and humanist Lodovico Lazzarelli, whose work became a major influence on Cornelius Agrippa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Campanelli, Maurizio, ed. 2011. Mercurii Trismegisti Pimander sive De Potestate et Sapientia Dei. Turin: Nino Aragno.Google Scholar
  2. Champier, Symphorien. 1507. Liber de quadruplici vita Theologia Asclepij hermetis trismegisti discipuli cum commentariis eidusdem. Lyon.Google Scholar
  3. Faivre, Antoine. 2005. Hermetic literature IV: Renaissance-present. In Dictionary of Gnosis and Western Esotericism, ed. Wouter J. Hanegraaff, in collaboration with Antoine Faivre, Roelof van den Broek and Jean-Pierre Brach, 533–544. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  4. Festugière, André-Jean. 1942–1954. La révélation d’Hermès Trismégiste. Vol. 4 vols. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
  5. Fowden, Garth. 1986. The Egyptian Hermes: A historical approach to the late pagan mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Garin, E., M. Brini, C. Vasoli, and C. Zambelli. 1955. Testi Umanistici su l’Ermetismo: Testi di Ludovico Lazzarelli, F. Giorgio Veneto, Cornelio Agrippa di Nettesheim. Rome: Fratelli Bocca.Google Scholar
  7. Hanegraaff, Wouter J. 2005. Lodovico Lazzarelli and the Hermetic Christ: At the sources of renaissance Hermetism. In Lodovico Lazzarelli (1447–1500): The Hermetic Writings and Related Documents, ed. Wouter J. Hanegraaff and Ruud M. Bouthoorn, 1–104. Tempe/Arizona: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies.Google Scholar
  8. Hanegraaff, Wouter J. 2008. Altered states of knowledge: The attainment of Gnosis in the Hermetica. The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 2: 128–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hanegraaff, Wouter J. 2009. Better than magic: Cornelius Agrippa and Lazzarellian Hermetism. Magic, Ritual & Witchcraft 4: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hanegraaff, Wouter J. 2012. Esotericism and the academy: Rejected knowledge in western culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hanegraaff, Wouter J. 2013a. The notion of “Occult Sciences” in the wake of the enlightenment. In Aufklärung und Esoterik: Wege in die Moderne, ed. Monika Neugebauer-Wölk, Renko Geffarth, and Markus Meumann, 73–95. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  12. Hanegraaff, Wouter J. 2013b. Hermetism. In The Oxford guide to the historical reception of Augustine, ed. Karl Pollmann et al., 1135–1139. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hanegraaff, Wouter J. 2015. How hermetic was renaissance hermetism? Aries 15: 179–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hanegraaff, Wouter J., and Ruud M. Bouthoorn. 2005. Lodovico Lazzarelli (1447–1500): The hermetic writings and related documents. Tempe/Arizona: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies.Google Scholar
  15. Kristeller, Paul Oskar. 1938. Marsilio Ficino e Lodovico Lazzarelli: Contributo alla diffuzione delle idee ermetiche nel Rinascimento. Annali della R. Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Lettere, Storia e Filosofia 2: 237–262 (repr. in Kristeller, Paul Oskar. 1956. Studies in renaissance thought and letters, vol. 1. Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 221–247.Google Scholar
  16. Lazzarelli, Lodovico. 2009. Opere ermetiche, ed. Claudio Moreschini, Maria Paola Saci and Fabio Troncarelli. Pisa-Roma: Fabrizio Serra Editore.Google Scholar
  17. Lefèvre d’Étaples, Jacques [Jacobus Faber Stapulensis]. 1505. Pimander. Mercurij Trismegisti liber de de [sic] sapientia et potestate dei. Asclepius. Eiusdem Mercurij liber de voluntate divina. Item Crater Hermetis A Lazarelo Septempedano. Paris.Google Scholar
  18. Lucentini, Paolo, Ilaria Parri, and Vittoria Perrone Compagni, eds. 2003. Hermetism from late antiquity to humanism. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  19. Mahé, Jean-Pierre. 1982. Hermès en Haute-Égypte, vol. 2: Le fragment du Discours Parfait et les Définitions Hermétiques Arméniennes (NH VI,8.8a). Québec: Les Presses de l’Université Laval.Google Scholar
  20. Mulsow, Martin, ed. 2002. Das Ende des Hermetismus: Historische Kritik und neue Naturphilosophie in der Spätrenaissance. Dokumentation und Analyse der Debatte um die Datierung der hermetischen Schriften von Genebrard bis Casaubon (1567–1614). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
  21. van den Broek, Roelof. 2005a. Hermes Trismegistus I: Antiquity. In Dictionary of Gnosis and Western Esotericism, ed. Wouter J. Hanegraaff, in collaboration with Antoine Faivre, Roelof van den Broek and Jean-Pierre Brach, 474–478. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  22. van den Broek, Roelof. 2005b. Hermetism. In Dictionary of Gnosis and Western Esotericism, ed. Wouter J. Hanegraaff, in collaboration with Antoine Faivre, Roelof van den Broek and Jean-Pierre Brach, 558–570. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  23. Walbridge, John. 2001. The wisdom of the mystic east: Suhrawardi and platonic orientalism. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  24. Walker, Daniel P. 1954. The Prisca Theologia in France. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 17: 204–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Weill-Parot, Nicolas. 2002. Les “images astrologiques” au Moyen Âge et à la Renaissance: Spéculations intellectuelles et pratiques magiques (XIIe–XVe siècle). Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
  26. Yates, Frances A. 1964. Giordano Bruno and the hermetic tradition. London/Chicago: Routledge and Kegan Paul/University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Section editors and affiliations

  • Teodoro Katinis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Literary StudiesGhent UniversityGhentBelgium