Abstract
The ancient sophists, such as Gorgias of Leontini and Protagoras of Abdera, are generally – and often superficially – connected to relativism, immoralism, skepticism, and opportunism. Their historical and intellectual identity was recovered during the Renaissance along with other classical authors, especially Plato who built his philosophy against the sophistic tradition of the fifth and fourth century BC. Starting with the fifteenth-century translations and commentaries, from Leonardo Bruni to Marsilio Ficino, the sophistic writings resurfaced and played an important role in the philosophical and literary history of the European Renaissance. Several Renaissance authors provided original reinterpretations of the ancient sophists both in Neo-Latin and vernacular literature. International scholarship has recently started a detailed exploration of the rebirth of sophistry in early-modern era and has already provided important results that this entry intends to summarize.
References
Allen, Michael J.B. 1989. Icastes: Marsilio Ficino’s interpretation of Plato’s Sophist. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bausi, Francesco. 1992. Nota sul procedimento antilogico nei Dialoghi di Leonardo Bruni. Interpres 12: 275–283.
Bembo, Pietro. 1983. Gorgiae Leontini in Helenam laudatio, ed. F. Donadi. Roma: L’Erma di Bretschneider.
Buranello, Robert. 1999. The identity of discord: The paradoxical discourse of Sperone Speroni’s Dialogo della discordia. Studi d’italianistica nell’Africa australe 12 (2): 58–74.
Comanini, Gregorio. 1591. Figino, overo del fine della pittura. Mantova: per Francesco Osanna.
Comanini, Gregorio. 2001. In The Figino, or On the purpose of painting. Art theory in the late Renaissance, ed. A. Doyle-Anderson and G. Maiorino. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Diels, Hermann, and Walther Kranz. 1951–1952. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. 6th ed. Berlin: Weidmannsche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
Fournel, Jean-Louis. 2014. Les dialogues de Sperone Speroni: liberté de la parole et règles de l’écriture. Marburg: Hitzeroth, 1990; reprint: Pref. M. Pozzi. Milano: Ledizioni.
Fumaroli, Marc. 2002. L’Âge de l’éloquence : Réthorique et res literaria de la Renaissance au seuil de l’époque classique. Gèneve: Droz.
Gigante, Marcello. 1988. Ambrogio Traversari interprete di Diogene Laerzio. In Ambrogio Traversari nel VI ceneario della nascita, ed. G.C. Garfagnini. Firenze: L.S. Olschki.
Giglioni, Guido. 2010. The matter of the imagination. The Renaissance debate over icastic and fantastic imagination. Camenae 8: 1–21.
Giglioni, Guido. 2012. The many rhetorical personae of an early modern physician: Girolamo Cardano on truth and persuasion. In Rhetoric and medicine in Early Modern Europe, ed. S. Pender and N.S. Struever. Farnham/Burlngton: Ashgate.
Girardi, Raffaele. 1990. Ercole e il Granchio: figure della ‘sofistica speroniana’. Giornale Storico della Letteratura Italiana 167: 396–411.
Katinis, Teodoro. 2013. Ficino interprete dei dialoghi platonici contro i sofisti. Bruniana & Campanelliana 19: 47–55.
Katinis, Teodoro. 2015. Praising discord: Speroni’s Dialogo della Discordia and Erasmus’ influence. Erasmus Studies 35 (2): 137–153.
Katinis, Teodoro. 2018. Sperone Speroni and the debate over Sophistry in the Italian Renaissance. Leiden-Boston: Brill.
MacPhail, Eric. 2006. Erasmus the sophist. Erasmus of Rotterdam Society Yearbook 26: 71–89.
MacPhail, Eric. 2011. The sophistic Renaissance. Genève: Droz.
MacPhail, Eric. 2012. Philosophers in the New World: Montaigne and the tradition of epideictic rhetoric. Rhetorica 30: 22–36.
Marsh, David. 1999. Lucian and the Latins. Humor and humanism in the Early Renaissance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Mazzoni, Jacopo. 1587. Della difesa della Comedia di Dante, distinta in sette libri, nella quale si risponde alle oppositioni fatte al Discorso di M. Iacopo Mazzoni, e si tratta pienamente dell’arte poetica … parte prima, che contiene li primi tre libri. Cesena: Appresso B. Raverij.
Mazzoni, Jacopo. 1982. Introduzione alla Difesa della Commedia di Dante, ed. E. Musacchio and G. Pellegrini. Bologna: Cappelli.
Mazzoni, Jacopo. 1983. On the defense of the Comedy of Dante. Introduction and summary, ed. R.L. Montgomery. Tallahasse: University Presses of Florida.
Merkl, Heinrich. 2004. Cervantes, Protágoras y la Postmodernidad. El ‘Quijote’ de 1605 y algunos diálogos de Platón. Anuario de Estudios Cervantinos 1: 139–147.
Merkl, Heinrich. 2011. Cervantes anti-sofista: sobre Platón, Ficino, y los tres Quijotes, 1605, 1614 y 1615. Pontevedra: Editorial Academia del Hispanismo.
Moreschini, Claudio. 2016. Idolo, fantasia e poesia da Ficino a Mazzoni. Bruniana & Campanelliana 22 (1): 47–60.
Nauta, Lodi. 2009. Defense of common sense. Lorenzo Valla’s humanist critique of scholastic philosophy. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.
Pozzi, Mario. 1989. Speroni e il genere epidittico. In Sperone Speroni. Padova: Editoriale Programma.
Russo, Emilio. 2000. Il rifiuto della sofistica nelle postille tassiane a Jacopo Mazzoni. La cultura 38: 279–318.
Russo, Emilio. 2002. La risposta al Mazzoni nei Discorsi del poema eroico. Id. L’ordine, la fantasia e l’arte. Ricerche per un quinquennio tassiano (1588–1592). Roma: Bulzoni.
Scarpati, Claudio. 1985. Iacopo Mazzoni tra Tasso e Marino. Aevum 59: 433–458.
Scarpati, Claudio, and Eraldo Bellini. 1990. Il vero e il falso dei poeti. Tasso Tesauro Pallavicino Muratori. Milano: Vita e pensiero.
Speroni, Sperone. 1989. Opere … tratte da’ mss. Originali, ed. N. dalle Laste and M. Forcellini, 5 tomes. Venezia: Appresso D. Occhi, 1740. reprint: ed. M. Pozzi. Roma: Vecchiarelli.
Tasso, Torquato. 1875. Apologia in difesa della Gerusalemme liberata. Id. Prose diverse, ed. C. Guasti. I. Firenze: Le Monnier.
Tasso, Torquato. 1964. In Discorsi dell’arte poetica e del poema eroico, ed. L. Poma. Bari: Laterza.
Tasso, Torquato. 1973. Discourses on the Heroic Poem, eds. M. Cavalchini and I. Samuel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Trinkaus, Charles. 1976. Protagoras in the Renaissance. In Philosophy and humanism. Renaissance essays in Honor of Paul Oskar Kristeller, ed. E.P. Mahoney. Leiden: Brill.
Venier, Matteo, ed. 2011. Platonis Gorgias Leonardo Aretino interprete. Firenze: SISMEL Edizioni del Galluzzo.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Katinis, T. (2019). Sophists. In: Sgarbi, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_1127-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_1127-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities