Skip to main content

Sophists

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy
  • 63 Accesses

Abstract

The ancient sophists, such as Gorgias of Leontini and Protagoras of Abdera, are generally – and often superficially – connected to relativism, immoralism, skepticism, and opportunism. Their historical and intellectual identity was recovered during the Renaissance along with other classical authors, especially Plato who built his philosophy against the sophistic tradition of the fifth and fourth century BC. Starting with the fifteenth-century translations and commentaries, from Leonardo Bruni to Marsilio Ficino, the sophistic writings resurfaced and played an important role in the philosophical and literary history of the European Renaissance. Several Renaissance authors provided original reinterpretations of the ancient sophists both in Neo-Latin and vernacular literature. International scholarship has recently started a detailed exploration of the rebirth of sophistry in early-modern era and has already provided important results that this entry intends to summarize.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, Michael J.B. 1989. Icastes: Marsilio Ficino’s interpretation of Plato’s Sophist. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bausi, Francesco. 1992. Nota sul procedimento antilogico nei Dialoghi di Leonardo Bruni. Interpres 12: 275–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bembo, Pietro. 1983. Gorgiae Leontini in Helenam laudatio, ed. F. Donadi. Roma: L’Erma di Bretschneider.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buranello, Robert. 1999. The identity of discord: The paradoxical discourse of Sperone Speroni’s Dialogo della discordia. Studi d’italianistica nell’Africa australe 12 (2): 58–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comanini, Gregorio. 1591. Figino, overo del fine della pittura. Mantova: per Francesco Osanna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comanini, Gregorio. 2001. In The Figino, or On the purpose of painting. Art theory in the late Renaissance, ed. A. Doyle-Anderson and G. Maiorino. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diels, Hermann, and Walther Kranz. 1951–1952. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. 6th ed. Berlin: Weidmannsche Verlagsbuchhandlung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournel, Jean-Louis. 2014. Les dialogues de Sperone Speroni: liberté de la parole et règles de l’écriture. Marburg: Hitzeroth, 1990; reprint: Pref. M. Pozzi. Milano: Ledizioni.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fumaroli, Marc. 2002. L’Âge de l’éloquence : Réthorique et res literaria de la Renaissance au seuil de l’époque classique. Gèneve: Droz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigante, Marcello. 1988. Ambrogio Traversari interprete di Diogene Laerzio. In Ambrogio Traversari nel VI ceneario della nascita, ed. G.C. Garfagnini. Firenze: L.S. Olschki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giglioni, Guido. 2010. The matter of the imagination. The Renaissance debate over icastic and fantastic imagination. Camenae 8: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giglioni, Guido. 2012. The many rhetorical personae of an early modern physician: Girolamo Cardano on truth and persuasion. In Rhetoric and medicine in Early Modern Europe, ed. S. Pender and N.S. Struever. Farnham/Burlngton: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girardi, Raffaele. 1990. Ercole e il Granchio: figure della ‘sofistica speroniana’. Giornale Storico della Letteratura Italiana 167: 396–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katinis, Teodoro. 2013. Ficino interprete dei dialoghi platonici contro i sofisti. Bruniana & Campanelliana 19: 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katinis, Teodoro. 2015. Praising discord: Speroni’s Dialogo della Discordia and Erasmus’ influence. Erasmus Studies 35 (2): 137–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katinis, Teodoro. 2018. Sperone Speroni and the debate over Sophistry in the Italian Renaissance. Leiden-Boston: Brill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacPhail, Eric. 2006. Erasmus the sophist. Erasmus of Rotterdam Society Yearbook 26: 71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacPhail, Eric. 2011. The sophistic Renaissance. Genève: Droz.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacPhail, Eric. 2012. Philosophers in the New World: Montaigne and the tradition of epideictic rhetoric. Rhetorica 30: 22–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, David. 1999. Lucian and the Latins. Humor and humanism in the Early Renaissance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoni, Jacopo. 1587. Della difesa della Comedia di Dante, distinta in sette libri, nella quale si risponde alle oppositioni fatte al Discorso di M. Iacopo Mazzoni, e si tratta pienamente dell’arte poetica … parte prima, che contiene li primi tre libri. Cesena: Appresso B. Raverij.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoni, Jacopo. 1982. Introduzione alla Difesa della Commedia di Dante, ed. E. Musacchio and G. Pellegrini. Bologna: Cappelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoni, Jacopo. 1983. On the defense of the Comedy of Dante. Introduction and summary, ed. R.L. Montgomery. Tallahasse: University Presses of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkl, Heinrich. 2004. Cervantes, Protágoras y la Postmodernidad. El ‘Quijote’ de 1605 y algunos diálogos de Platón. Anuario de Estudios Cervantinos 1: 139–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkl, Heinrich. 2011. Cervantes anti-sofista: sobre Platón, Ficino, y los tres Quijotes, 1605, 1614 y 1615. Pontevedra: Editorial Academia del Hispanismo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreschini, Claudio. 2016. Idolo, fantasia e poesia da Ficino a Mazzoni. Bruniana & Campanelliana 22 (1): 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauta, Lodi. 2009. Defense of common sense. Lorenzo Valla’s humanist critique of scholastic philosophy. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozzi, Mario. 1989. Speroni e il genere epidittico. In Sperone Speroni. Padova: Editoriale Programma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, Emilio. 2000. Il rifiuto della sofistica nelle postille tassiane a Jacopo Mazzoni. La cultura 38: 279–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, Emilio. 2002. La risposta al Mazzoni nei Discorsi del poema eroico. Id. L’ordine, la fantasia e l’arte. Ricerche per un quinquennio tassiano (1588–1592). Roma: Bulzoni.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarpati, Claudio. 1985. Iacopo Mazzoni tra Tasso e Marino. Aevum 59: 433–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarpati, Claudio, and Eraldo Bellini. 1990. Il vero e il falso dei poeti. Tasso Tesauro Pallavicino Muratori. Milano: Vita e pensiero.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speroni, Sperone. 1989. Opere … tratte da’ mss. Originali, ed. N. dalle Laste and M. Forcellini, 5 tomes. Venezia: Appresso D. Occhi, 1740. reprint: ed. M. Pozzi. Roma: Vecchiarelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasso, Torquato. 1875. Apologia in difesa della Gerusalemme liberata. Id. Prose diverse, ed. C. Guasti. I. Firenze: Le Monnier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasso, Torquato. 1964. In Discorsi dell’arte poetica e del poema eroico, ed. L. Poma. Bari: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasso, Torquato. 1973. Discourses on the Heroic Poem, eds. M. Cavalchini and I. Samuel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinkaus, Charles. 1976. Protagoras in the Renaissance. In Philosophy and humanism. Renaissance essays in Honor of Paul Oskar Kristeller, ed. E.P. Mahoney. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venier, Matteo, ed. 2011. Platonis Gorgias Leonardo Aretino interprete. Firenze: SISMEL Edizioni del Galluzzo.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teodoro Katinis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Katinis, T. (2019). Sophists. In: Sgarbi, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_1127-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_1127-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics