Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy

Living Edition
| Editors: Marco Sgarbi

Induction

  • John P. McCaskey
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_1054-1

Abstract

How induction was understood took a substantial turn during the Renaissance. At the beginning, induction was understood as it had been throughout the medieval period, as a kind of propositional inference that is stronger the more it approximates deduction. During the Renaissance, an older understanding, one prevalent in antiquity, was rediscovered and adopted. By this understanding, induction identifies defining characteristics using a process of comparing and contrasting.

Important participants in the change were Jean Buridan, humanists such as Lorenzo Valla and Rudolph Agricola, Paduan Aristotelians such as Agostino Nifo, Jacopo Zabarella, and members of the medical faculty, writers on philosophy of mind such as the Englishman John Case, writers of reasoning handbooks, and Francis Bacon.

Keywords

Universal Statement Medieval Period Posterior Analytics Minor Premise Socratic Dialogue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Agricola, Rudolph. 1515. De Inventione Dialectica. Louvain: Alost.Google Scholar
  2. Bacon, Francis. 1620. Novum organum. In Instauratio magna. London: John Bill.Google Scholar
  3. Bacon, Francis. 1857–1870. Valerius terminus. In vol. 3 of The collected works of Francis Bacon. Edited by James Spedding, Robert Leslie Ellis, and Douglas Denon Heath. London: Longmans & Co.Google Scholar
  4. Bacon, Francis. 2000. In The New Organon, eds. Lisa Jardine and Michael Silverthorne. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Boyle, Robert. 1999. The Origine of forms and qualities, according to the corpuscular philosophy. In vol. 5 of The works of Robert Boyle. Edited by Michael Hunter and Edward Davis. London: Pickering & Chatto.Google Scholar
  6. Buridan, Jean. 2001. Summulae de Dialectica. Trans: Gyula Klima. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Case, John. 1584. Summa veterum interpretum in universam dialecticam Aristotelis. London: Thomas Vautrollier.Google Scholar
  8. Case, John. 1599. Lapis philosophicus seu commentarius in 8 libros physicorum Aristotelis in quo arcana physiologiae examinantur. Oxford: Joseph Barnes.Google Scholar
  9. Cunningham, Andrew. 1985. Fabricius and the ‘Aristotle project’ in anatomical teaching and research at Padua. In The medical renaissance of the sixteenth century, ed. A. Wear, R.K. French, and I.M. Lonie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Ducheyne, S., and John P. McCaskey. 2014. “The sources of mill’s views of ratiocination and induction.” In Mill’s a system of logic. Edited by Antis Loizides. Google Scholar
  11. Jardine, Lisa. 1988. Humanistic logic. In The Cambridge history of renaissance philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. McCaskey, John P. 2014. Induction in the socratic tradition. In Shifting the paradigm: Alternative perspectives on induction, ed. P.C. Biondi and L.F. Groarke. Berlin: De Guyter.Google Scholar
  13. Nifo, Agostino. 1535. Aristotelis Stagiritae Topica inuentio in octo secta libros. Venice: Octavianus Scotus.Google Scholar
  14. Ockham, William. 1967–1988. Opera philosophica et theologica, ed. Gedeon Gál et al. St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute.Google Scholar
  15. Randall, John Herman. 1940. The development of scientific method in the school of Padua. Journal of the History of Ideas 1: 177–206.Google Scholar
  16. Seton, John. 1545. Dialectica. London: Tho. Berthelet.Google Scholar
  17. Valla, Lorenzo. 1982. Repastinatio dialectice et philosophie, ed. Gianni Zippel. Padua: Antenore.Google Scholar
  18. Whewell, William. 1840. The history of the inductive sciences, from the earliest to the present time. London: John W. Parker.Google Scholar
  19. Wilson, Thomas. 1551. The rule of reason, conteinyng the arte of logique, set forth in Englishe. London: Richard Grafton.Google Scholar
  20. Zabarella, Jacopo. 2014. On methods and On regressus. Edited and translated by John P. McCaskey. I Tatti Renaissance Library, vols. 58 and 59. Cambridge, Mass./London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Columbia UniversityNew YorkUSA