Abstract
Complexity-theoretical approaches in Applied Linguistics are relatively new, but they hold great promise as an integrative (meta-)theory, provide new ways of hypothesizing about and conceptualizing the complex phenomena of language use and (second) language development, and also require different data gathering and analytical methods. This chapter sketches first the main tenets of a theory of complex adaptive systems (CAS) as it applies to technology-mediated language learning. The investigation of complex adaptive systems in computer-assisted language learning (CALL) is in its infancy; a selection of representative CAS studies in CALL will be discussed. As will become apparent, the main challenge for future research in this area is the design and application of robust commensurate research methods. General facets of a CAS methodology in CALL will be outlined and a general direction for future investigation will be given.
References
Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M. H., Croft, W., Ellis, N. C., et al. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning, 59(Suppl. 1), 1–26.
Bertin, J.-C., & Narcy-Combes, J.-P. (2012). Tutoring at a distance: Modelling as a tool to control chaos. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(2), 111–127.
de Bot, K., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2011). Research second language development from a dynamic systems theory perspective. In M. H. Verspoor, K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development (pp. 5–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7–21.
Braga, J. D. C. F. (2013). Fractal groups: Emergent dynamics in on-line learning communities. Revista Brasileira de Linguistica Aplicada, 13(2), 603–623.
Chapelle, C. A. (2009). The relationship between second language acquisition theory and computer-assisted language learning. Modern Language Journal, 93, 741–753. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00970.x.
Colpaert, J. (2013). Peripatetic consideration on research challenges in CALL. In P. Hubbard, M. Schulze, & B. Smith (Eds.), Learner-computer interaction in language education (pp. 272–279). San Marcos, TX: Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium.
Davis, B., & Simmt, E. (2003). Understanding learning systems: Mathematics education and complexity science. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(2), 137–167.
Dörnyei, Z. (2014). Researching complex dynamic systems: “Retrodictive qualitative modeling” in the language classroom. Language Teaching, 47(1), 80–81.
Gee, J. P. (2006). Why game studies now? Video games: A new art form. Games & Culture, 1(1), 58–61.
Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Viking.
Heift, T., & Schulze, M. (2007). Errors and intelligence in CALL. Parsers and pedagogues. New York: Routledge.
Heift, T., & Schulze, M. (2015). Tutorial CALL. Language Teaching, 48(4), 471–490.
Kelsey, S., & St. Amant, K. (2008). Handbook of research on computer mediated communication. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
de Keyser, R. (Ed.). (2007). Practice in a second language. Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (2008). The relevance of cognitive grammar for language pedagogy. In S. De Knop & T. De Rycker (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar. A volume in honour of René Dirven (pp. 7–35). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141–165.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2002). Language acquisition and language use form a chaos/complexity theory perspective. In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives (pp. 33–46). London: Continuum.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008a). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008b). Research methodology on language development from a complex systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 200–213.
Liou, H.-C. (2012). The roles of Second Life in a college computer-assisted language learning (CALL) course in Taiwan, ROC. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(4), 365–382.
Lorenz, E. N. (1963). The predictability of hydrodynamic flow. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 25(4), 409–432.
Lorenz, E. N. (1993). The essence of chaos. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Marek, M. W., & Wu, W.-C. V. (2014). Environmental factors affecting computer assisted language learning success: A complex dynamic systems conceptual model. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(6), 1–19.
Nicholson, J. (2014). Fractal. In The concise Oxford dictionary of mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordreference.com/10.1093/acref/9780199679591.001.0001/acref-9780199679591-e-1173. doi:10.1093/acref/9780199679591.013.1173.
Penner, N., & Schulze, M. (2010). Group work in a technology-rich environment. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 21(1), 111–137.
Scholz, K. (2017). Encouraging free play: Extramural digital game-based language learning as a complex adaptive system. CALICO Journal, 34(1), 39–57.
Scholz, K., & Schulze, M. (2017). Digital-gaming trajectories and second language development. Language, Learning and Technology, 21(1), 100–120.
Schulze, M., & Scholz, K. (2016). CALL theory: Complex adaptive systems. In C. Caws & M.-J. Hamel (Eds.), Learner-computer interactions: New insights on CALL theories and applications (pp. 65–87). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sockett, G. (2013). Understanding the online informal learning of English as a complex dynamic system: An emic approach. ReCALL, 25(1), 48–62.
Sockett, G., & Toffoli, D. (2012). Beyond learner autonomy: A dynamic systems view of the informal learning of English in virtual online communities. ReCALL, 24(2), 138–151.
Souza, V. V. S. (2013). Virtual learning environments in the light of the complexity paradigm: Interface, affordances and equifinality. Revista Brasileira de Linguistica Aplicada, 13(2), 577–601.
Swain, M., Kinnear, P., & Steinman, L. (2011). Sociocultural theory in second language education: An introduction through narratives. Bristol/Buffalo: Multilingual Matters.
Thorne, S. L., Fischer, I., & Lu, X. (2012). The semiotic ecology and linguistic complexity of an online game world. ReCALL, 24(3), 279–301.
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.
Tuckerman, M. E. (2008). Reaction coordinates. Retrieved October 31, 2014, from https://www.nyu.edu/classes/tuckerman/stat.mechII/lectures/lecture_9/node5.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Schulze, M. (2017). Complexity Approaches to Computer-Assisted Language Learning. In: Thorne, S., May, S. (eds) Language, Education and Technology. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02328-1_24-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02328-1_24-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02328-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02328-1
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education