Skip to main content

Assessing Second/Additional Language of Diverse Populations

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Language Testing and Assessment

Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of Language and Education ((ELE))

Abstract

In this chapter we address second/additional language assessment from two perspectives. First, we look at assessment of linguistic minority students within a national context where their second/additional language is the predominant majority language or an important auxiliary language in the society. Then we look at other contexts where bi/multilingualism is strongly encouraged (e.g., in countries within the European Union) and second/additional language assessment plays an important role in determining educational success. In both cases, for reasons of our professional experience, we focus our discussion on English as the second/additional language, though we refer to other languages where appropriate. We present in turn the major developments related to each of the themes and consider some of the problems and difficulties associated with developing assessment frameworks that are appropriate for such diverse populations and contexts. We detail some of the advances in Europe as we believe they signal some of the likely future directions reflecting progressive societal recognition of the value of a person’s proficiencies in different languages within their linguistic repertoires. We also highlight the dangers of using language assessment criteria modeled on one kind of population for another inappropriately for reasons of administrative and policy expediency and context-insensitive public accountability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abedi, J., Hofstetter, C. H., & Lord, C. (2004). Assessment accommodations for English language learners: Implications for policy-based empirical research. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Absolum, M., Flockton, L., Hattie, J., Hipkins, R., & Reid, I. (Undated). Directions for assessment in New Zealand. Retrieved 7 Oct 2015, from http://www.tki.org.nz/r/assessment/research/mainpage/directions/

  • Alderson, J. C., & Huta, A. (2005). The development of a suite of computer based diagnostic tests based on the Common European Framework. Language Testing, 22(3), 301–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment for learning: 10 principles. Retrieved 1 Apr 2014, from http://assessmentreformgroup.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/10principles_english.pdf

  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2014). English as an additional language or dialect: Teacher resource – EAL/D learning progression: Foundation to Year 10. Sydney: ACARA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, A., & Huang, B. H. (2011). Do current English language development/proficiency standards reflect the English needed for success in school? Language Testing, 28(3), 343–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechger, T., Kuijper, H., & Maris, G. (2009). Standard setting in relation to the Common European Framework for Languages. The case of the state examination of Dutch as a second language. Language Assessment Quarterly, 6(2), 126–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadfoot, P., & Pollard, A. (2000). The changing discourse of assessment policy: The case of English primary education. In A. Filer (Ed.), Assessment: Social practice and social product (pp. 11–26). London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, F. A., & Stevens, R. (2001). Standardized assessment of the content knowledge of English language learners K-12: Current trends and old dilemmas. Language Testing, 18(4), 409–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byram, M., & Parmenter, L. (Eds.). (2012). The Common European Framework of Reference. The globalization of language education policy. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. (2006). English-medium teaching in European higher education. Language Teaching, 39(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework for reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (2005). Relating language examinations to the common european framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment (cef). Manual: Preliminary pilot version. Dgiv/edu/lang 2003, 5. Strasbourg: (Language Policy Division) Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (2009a). Relating language examinations to the Common European Framework for Languages (CEF). A manual. Strasbourg: Language Policy Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (2009b). Reference supplement to the Manual for relating language examinations to the CEFR. Strasbourg: Council of Europe: Language Policy Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, C., & Leung, C. (2009). Current issues in English language teacher-based assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 393–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education. (2014). Schools, pupils and their characteristics: January 2014. Retrieved 13 July 2015, from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/410543/2014_SPC_SFR_Text_v102.pdf

  • Department of Education Employment, & Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. (1999). English – The national curriculum for England. London: DfEE and QCA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Skills. (2005a). Pupil characteristics and class sizes in maintained schools in England, January 2005 (provisional). Retrieved 25 July 2006, from http://www.dfes.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000574/sfr16-2005.pdf

  • Department for Education and Skills. (2005b). Aiming high: guidance on assessment of pupils learning English as an additional language. Nottingham: DfES.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2013). Study on educational support for newly arrived migrant children. Brussels: Publications Office, European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M., Jones, N., Leung, C., & Liu, Y. C. (2015). EAL assessment and evaluation framework. NALDIC Quarterly, 15(2), 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueras, N., North, B., Takala, S., & Verhelst, N. (2005). Relating examinations to the Common European Framework: A manual. Language Testing, 22(3), 261–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodier, T. (2014). Working with CEFR can-do statements An investigation of UK English language teacher beliefs and published materials. Unpublished M.A. dissertation, King’s College, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsch, C. (2014). General language proficiency revisited: Current and future issues. Language Assessment Quarterly, 11(2), 152–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasselgreen, A. (2005). Assessing the language of young learners. Language Testing, 22(3), 337–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. (2006). Current perspectives on teaching World Englishes and English as a Lingua Franca. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 157–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. (2014). English as a lingua franca: The international university. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J., & Leung, C. (2013). English as a Lingua Franca. In A. Kunnan (Ed.), Companion to language assessment. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, L. (2001). The European Year of Languages – Taking forward the languages debate. Language Teaching, 34(1), 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2013). The unfairness of equal treatment: Objectivity in L2 testing and dynamic assessment. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19(2–3), 141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, C. (2001). English as an additional language: Distinctive language focus or diffused curriculum concerns? Language and Education, 15(1), 33–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, C. (2009). Mainstreaming: Language policies and pedagogies. In I. Gogolin & U. Neumann (Eds.), Streitfall Zweisprachigkeit – The bilingualism controversy (pp. 215–231). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, C. (2013). Classroom-based assessment: Issues for language teacher education. In A. Kunnan (Ed.), Companion to language assessment (Vol. III, pp. 1510–1519). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, C. (2014). Communication and participatory involvement in linguistically diverse classrooms. In S. May (Ed.), The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL and Bilingual Education (pp. 123–146). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, C., & Lewkowicz, J. (2012). Language communication and communicative competence: A view from contemporary classrooms. Language and Education, 27(5), 398–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, D. (2002). The European Language Portfolio: Structure, origins, implementation and challenges. Language Teaching, 35(3), 182–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, D. (2005). The Common European Framework and the European Language Portfolio: Involving learners and their judgements in the assessment process. Language Testing, 22(3), 321–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, D., Goullier, F., & Hughes, G. (2011). The European language portfolio: The story so far (1991–2011). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llywodraeth Cynulliad Cymru. (2010). How to develop thinking and assessment for learning in the classroom. Cardiff: Welsh Assembly Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, P. (1992). ESL development: Language and literacy in schools project: Vol 1 and 2. East Melbourne: National Languages and Literacy Institute of Australia (NLLIA).

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, P. (Ed.). (2007). Assessing, monitoring and understanding English as a second language in schools: The NLLIA ESL Bandscales Verison 2. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology and Independent Schools Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menken, K. (2008). English learners left behind. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menken, K., Hudson, T., & Leung, C. (2014). Symposium: Language assessment in standards-based education reform. TESOL Quarterly, 48(3), 586–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, H.-D., & Benavot, A. (2013). PISA and the globalization of education governance: Some puzzles and problems. In H.-D. Meyer & A. Benavot (Eds.), PISA, power, and policy: The emergence of global educational governance (pp. 7–26). Oxford: Symposium Books.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). English Language Learners. Retrieved 10 July 2015, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cgf.asp

  • North, B. (2014). The CEFR in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. (2000). A language in common: Assessing English as an additional language. London: QCA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rea-Dickins, P. (2000). Current research and professional practice: Reports of work in progress into the assessment of young language learners. Language Testing, 17(2), 245–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rea-Dickins, P. (2001). Mirror, mirror on the wall: Identifying processes of classroom assessment. Language Testing, 18(4), 429–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidlhofer, B. (2011). Understanding English as a lingua franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shohamy, E. (2007). Reinterpreting globalization in multilingual contexts. International Multilingual Research Journal, 1(2), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shohamy, E. (2014). The weight of English in global perspective: The role of English in Israel. Review of Research in Education, 38(1), 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solórzano, R. W. (2008). High stakes testing: Issues, implications, and remedies for English Language Learners. Review of Educational Research, 78(2), 260–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South Australian Curriculum Standards and Accountability Framework (SACSA). (Undated). ESL Scope and Scales: SACSA, South Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaffield, S. (Ed.). (2008). Unlocking assessment: Understanding for reflection and application. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL). (1997). ESL standards for pre-k-12 students. Alexandria: TESOL.

    Google Scholar 

  • TESOL. (2006). PreK-12 English Language Proficiency Standards. Alexandria: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travers, P., & Higgs, L. (2004). Beyond the naming of parts: Working with pupils at Key Stages 3 and 4 in the English curriculum. In P. Travers & G. Klein (Eds.), Equal Measures: Ethnic minority and bilingual pupils in secondary schools (pp. 27–44). Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, C. E., & Purpura, J. E. (2016). Learning-oriented assessment in second and foreign language classrooms. In D. Tsagari & J. Banerjee (Eds.), Handbook of second language assessment. Berlin: DeGruyter Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, C. J. (2005). Limitations of the common european framework for developing comparable examinations and tests. Language Testing, 22(3), 281–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomingdale: Solution Tree Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J. R. W., & Wu, R. Y. F. (2010). Relating the GEPT reading comprehension tests to the CEFR. Studies in Language Testing, 33, 204–224.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Constant Leung .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Leung, C., Lewkowicz, J. (2017). Assessing Second/Additional Language of Diverse Populations. In: Shohamy, E., Or, I., May, S. (eds) Language Testing and Assessment. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02261-1_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics