Skip to main content

Researching Body Movements and Interaction in Education

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Research Methods in Language and Education

Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of Language and Education ((ELE))

  • 3937 Accesses

Abstract

It is widely acknowledged that talk is inextricably interwoven with body movements in everyday social interaction. Thus, it is important to take into account both talk and body movements deployed by participants when researching face-to-face interaction. Recent years have seen a growing interest in the study of body movements and interaction in educational settings. This chapter provides an overview of the early developments, major contributions, recent work in progress, and future research directions in the area of body movements in educational interaction. One commonality across these studies is that they provide detailed accounts of how body movements are consequential to the organization of actions in human interaction. Three theoretical approaches provide the foundation for the current research on body movements in educational interaction: the structural approach, conversation analysis, and microethnography. Utilizing these three approaches, recent research has explored the interactional function of body movements in education. Specifically, recent studies have examined the role of body movements in the display of emotions in educational interaction and multiactivity in education. Finally, some possible future research directions are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 289.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Belhiah, H. (2009). Tutoring as an embodied activity: How speech, gaze and body orientation are coordinated to conduct ESL tutorial business. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 829–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birdwhistell, R. (1952). Introduction to kinesics: An annotation system for analysis of body motion and gesture. Louisville: University of Louisville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, M. L., Morford, J. P., Shaffer, B., & Wilcox, P. P. (2010). The educational linguistics of bilingual deaf education. In F. M. Hult (Ed.), Directions and prospects for educational linguistics (pp. 99–115). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cekaite, A. (2012). Affective stances in teacher-novice student interactions: Language, embodiment, and willingness to learn in a Swedish primary classroom. Language in Society, 41, 641–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C.-M. (2013). Gestures as tone markers in multilingual communication. In I. Kecskes (Ed.), Research in Chinese as a second language (pp. 143–168). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Long, A. (1974). Kinesic signals at utterance boundaries in preschool children. Semiotica, 11(1), 43–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F., & Shultz, J. (1982). The counselor as gatekeeper: Social interaction in interviews. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, T. (2001). Touch. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, C. E. (1999). Collaborative construction of task activity: Coordinating multiple resources in a high school physics lab. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32(4), 369–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 97–121). New York: Irvington Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (2003). The body in action. In J. Coupland & R. Gwyn (Eds.), Discourse, the body and identity (pp. 19–42). New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, Y. G. (2006). Multimodal text analysis: A corpus linguistic approach to situated discourse. Text and Talk, 26(2), 127–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. K. (1993). The role of oral practices in the accomplishment of our everyday lives: The sociocultural dimension of interaction with implications for the learning of another language. Applied Linguistics, 14, 145–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. K. (2007). Redressing the roles of correction and repair in research on second and foreign language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 511–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellermann, J., & Cole, E. (2008). Practices for social interaction in language learning classrooms: Disengagement from dyadic task interaction. Applied Linguistics, 30, 186–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Käänta, L. (2010). Teacher turn-allocation and repair practices in classroom interaction: A multisemiotic perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendon, A. (1972). Some relationships between body motion and speech. In A. Seigman & B. Pope (Eds.), Studies in dyadic communication (pp. 177–216). New York: Pergamon Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, R. P., & Gospodinoff, K. (1979). Social contexts for ethnic borders and school failure. In A. Wolfgang (Ed.), Nonverbal behavior: Applications and cultural implications (pp. 175–196). New York: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, L. (2014). The temporal orders of multiactivity: Operating and demonstrating in the surgical theatre. In P. Haddington, T. Keisanen, L. Mondada, & M. Nevile (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking (pp. 33–75). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, L., & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2004). Second language acquisition as situated practice: Task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 50l–518l.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mori, J. (2004). Negotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities: A case from a Japanese language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 536–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mori, J., & Hayashi, M. (2006). The achievement of intersubjectivity through embodied completions: A study of interactions between first and second language speakers. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 195–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, K. (2008). Selecting next-speaker in the second language classroom: How to find a willing next-speaker in planned activities. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 55–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsher, D. (2004). Talk and gesture: The embodied completion of sequential actions in spoken interaction. In R. Gardner & J. Wagner (Eds.), Second language conversations (pp. 221–245). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsher, D. (2008). Gesturally enhanced repeats in the repair turn: Communication strategy or cognitive language-learning tool? In S. G. McCafferty & G. Stam (Eds.), Gesture: Second language acquisition and classroom research (pp. 109–130). Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plaza-Pust, C., & Morales-Lopez, E. (2008). Sign bilingualism: Language development, interaction, and maintenance in sign language contact situations. In C. Plaza-Pust & E. Morales-López (Eds.), Sign bilingualism: Language development, interaction, and maintenance in sign language contact situations (pp. 333–379). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlström, F. (2002). The interactional organization of hand raising in classroom interaction. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 37(2), 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheflen, A. E. (1964). The significance of posture in communication systems. Psychiatry, 27(4), 316–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1984). On some gestures’ relation to talk. In M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 266–296). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, R. (1998). Mediated discourse as social interaction. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selting, M. (2013). Verbal, vocal, and visual practices in conversational interaction. In C. Müller, E. Fricke, A. Cienki, & D. McNeill (Eds.), Body-language-communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 589–609). Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo, M.-S. (2011). Talk, body, and material objects as coordinated interactional resources in repair activities in one-on-one ESL tutoring. In G. Pallotti & J. Wagner (Eds.), L2 learning as social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives (pp. 107–134). Honolulu: NFLRC, University of Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shultz, J., & Florio, S. (1979). Stop and freeze: The negotiation of social and political space in a kindergarten/first grade classroom. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 10, 166–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stivers, T., & Sidnell, J. (2005). Introduction: Multimodal interaction. Semiotica, 156(1/4), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. (2011). Embodied interaction in the material world: An introduction. In C. Goodwin & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world (pp. 1–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski, M. H. (1999). Re-engaging and dis-engaging talk in activity. Language in Society, 28, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witt, P. L., & Wheeless, L. R. (1999). Nonverbal communication expectancies about teachers and enrollment behavior in distance learning. Communication Education, 48(2), 149–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoting Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Li, X. (2017). Researching Body Movements and Interaction in Education. In: King, K., Lai, YJ., May, S. (eds) Research Methods in Language and Education. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02249-9_33

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics