Abstract
It is widely acknowledged that talk is inextricably interwoven with body movements in everyday social interaction. Thus, it is important to take into account both talk and body movements deployed by participants when researching face-to-face interaction. Recent years have seen a growing interest in the study of body movements and interaction in educational settings. This chapter provides an overview of the early developments, major contributions, recent work in progress, and future research directions in the area of body movements in educational interaction. One commonality across these studies is that they provide detailed accounts of how body movements are consequential to the organization of actions in human interaction. Three theoretical approaches provide the foundation for the current research on body movements in educational interaction: the structural approach, conversation analysis, and microethnography. Utilizing these three approaches, recent research has explored the interactional function of body movements in education. Specifically, recent studies have examined the role of body movements in the display of emotions in educational interaction and multiactivity in education. Finally, some possible future research directions are discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Belhiah, H. (2009). Tutoring as an embodied activity: How speech, gaze and body orientation are coordinated to conduct ESL tutorial business. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 829–841.
Birdwhistell, R. (1952). Introduction to kinesics: An annotation system for analysis of body motion and gesture. Louisville: University of Louisville.
Carlson, M. L., Morford, J. P., Shaffer, B., & Wilcox, P. P. (2010). The educational linguistics of bilingual deaf education. In F. M. Hult (Ed.), Directions and prospects for educational linguistics (pp. 99–115). New York: Springer.
Cekaite, A. (2012). Affective stances in teacher-novice student interactions: Language, embodiment, and willingness to learn in a Swedish primary classroom. Language in Society, 41, 641–670.
Chen, C.-M. (2013). Gestures as tone markers in multilingual communication. In I. Kecskes (Ed.), Research in Chinese as a second language (pp. 143–168). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
De Long, A. (1974). Kinesic signals at utterance boundaries in preschool children. Semiotica, 11(1), 43–73.
Erickson, F., & Shultz, J. (1982). The counselor as gatekeeper: Social interaction in interviews. New York: Academic.
Field, T. (2001). Touch. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ford, C. E. (1999). Collaborative construction of task activity: Coordinating multiple resources in a high school physics lab. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32(4), 369–408.
Goodwin, C. (1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 97–121). New York: Irvington Publishers.
Goodwin, C. (2003). The body in action. In J. Coupland & R. Gwyn (Eds.), Discourse, the body and identity (pp. 19–42). New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.
Gu, Y. G. (2006). Multimodal text analysis: A corpus linguistic approach to situated discourse. Text and Talk, 26(2), 127–167.
Hall, J. K. (1993). The role of oral practices in the accomplishment of our everyday lives: The sociocultural dimension of interaction with implications for the learning of another language. Applied Linguistics, 14, 145–167.
Hall, J. K. (2007). Redressing the roles of correction and repair in research on second and foreign language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 511–526.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Arnold.
Hellermann, J., & Cole, E. (2008). Practices for social interaction in language learning classrooms: Disengagement from dyadic task interaction. Applied Linguistics, 30, 186–215.
Käänta, L. (2010). Teacher turn-allocation and repair practices in classroom interaction: A multisemiotic perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä.
Kendon, A. (1972). Some relationships between body motion and speech. In A. Seigman & B. Pope (Eds.), Studies in dyadic communication (pp. 177–216). New York: Pergamon Press.
Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.
McDermott, R. P., & Gospodinoff, K. (1979). Social contexts for ethnic borders and school failure. In A. Wolfgang (Ed.), Nonverbal behavior: Applications and cultural implications (pp. 175–196). New York: Academic.
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mondada, L. (2014). The temporal orders of multiactivity: Operating and demonstrating in the surgical theatre. In P. Haddington, T. Keisanen, L. Mondada, & M. Nevile (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking (pp. 33–75). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mondada, L., & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2004). Second language acquisition as situated practice: Task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 50l–518l.
Mori, J. (2004). Negotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities: A case from a Japanese language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 536–550.
Mori, J., & Hayashi, M. (2006). The achievement of intersubjectivity through embodied completions: A study of interactions between first and second language speakers. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 195–219.
Mortensen, K. (2008). Selecting next-speaker in the second language classroom: How to find a willing next-speaker in planned activities. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 55–79.
Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. London: Routledge.
Olsher, D. (2004). Talk and gesture: The embodied completion of sequential actions in spoken interaction. In R. Gardner & J. Wagner (Eds.), Second language conversations (pp. 221–245). London: Continuum.
Olsher, D. (2008). Gesturally enhanced repeats in the repair turn: Communication strategy or cognitive language-learning tool? In S. G. McCafferty & G. Stam (Eds.), Gesture: Second language acquisition and classroom research (pp. 109–130). Oxford: Routledge.
Plaza-Pust, C., & Morales-Lopez, E. (2008). Sign bilingualism: Language development, interaction, and maintenance in sign language contact situations. In C. Plaza-Pust & E. Morales-López (Eds.), Sign bilingualism: Language development, interaction, and maintenance in sign language contact situations (pp. 333–379). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sahlström, F. (2002). The interactional organization of hand raising in classroom interaction. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 37(2), 47–57.
Scheflen, A. E. (1964). The significance of posture in communication systems. Psychiatry, 27(4), 316–331.
Schegloff, E. A. (1984). On some gestures’ relation to talk. In M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 266–296). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289–327.
Scollon, R. (1998). Mediated discourse as social interaction. London: Longman.
Selting, M. (2013). Verbal, vocal, and visual practices in conversational interaction. In C. Müller, E. Fricke, A. Cienki, & D. McNeill (Eds.), Body-language-communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 589–609). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Seo, M.-S. (2011). Talk, body, and material objects as coordinated interactional resources in repair activities in one-on-one ESL tutoring. In G. Pallotti & J. Wagner (Eds.), L2 learning as social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives (pp. 107–134). Honolulu: NFLRC, University of Hawaii.
Shultz, J., & Florio, S. (1979). Stop and freeze: The negotiation of social and political space in a kindergarten/first grade classroom. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 10, 166–181.
Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stivers, T., & Sidnell, J. (2005). Introduction: Multimodal interaction. Semiotica, 156(1/4), 1–20.
Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. (2011). Embodied interaction in the material world: An introduction. In C. Goodwin & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world (pp. 1–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Szymanski, M. H. (1999). Re-engaging and dis-engaging talk in activity. Language in Society, 28, 1–23.
Witt, P. L., & Wheeless, L. R. (1999). Nonverbal communication expectancies about teachers and enrollment behavior in distance learning. Communication Education, 48(2), 149–154.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Li, X. (2017). Researching Body Movements and Interaction in Education. In: King, K., Lai, YJ., May, S. (eds) Research Methods in Language and Education. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02249-9_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02249-9_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02248-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02249-9
eBook Packages: EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education