Skip to main content

Methods in Multilingualism Research

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Research Methods in Language and Education

Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of Language and Education ((ELE))

  • 4161 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents an overview of research conducted on multilingual language acquisition (i.e., third language (L3) and additional language learning) with an emphasis on its methodological design. Early research developments in the field of multilingual language acquisition focused on the role of prior language experience on subsequent language learning with studies conducted in laboratories and in bilingual programs. Recent contributions to the field include studies that explore crosslinguistic influence (CLI) from different perspectives (e.g., universal grammar [UG], psycholinguistics, functional linguistics). Additionally, laboratory studies such as The Latin Project have investigated the interaction between prior linguistic knowledge and learning conditions and include cognitive variables (e.g., attentional control and working memory capacity) as possible moderating variables. Quantitative cross-sectional studies are common under these approaches, but qualitative analyses are often included to provide a larger picture of the results obtained. This is also the nature of a recent holistic approach to multilingualism (e.g., Cenoz and Gorter Mod Lang J 95(3): 339–343, 2011), which focuses on the connections among the different languages of the learner. Promising work in progress is exploring the effects of language experience on subsequent language learning with online measures of neurocognitive processing (e.g., Grey A neurocognitive investigation of bilingual advantages at additional language learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Georgetown University, Washington, DC, 2013). Also, longitudinal studies with schooled children and college students in bilingual areas (e.g., Catalonia and Basque Country in Spain) are trying to understand how instructional conditions affect subsequent language learning and how individual differences such as motivation interact with the effects observed. The last two sections of the chapter present problems that researchers may encounter in relation to sample, constructs, measurements, and analyses in conducting research on multilingual language acquisition. The chapter concludes with suggestions for future research in this area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 289.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2007). The role of the second language in third language acquisition: The case of Germanic syntax. Second Language Research, 23(4), 459–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bialystok, E. (2001). Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2015). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [computer program]. Version 5.4.12, retrieved 10 Jul 2015 from http://www.praat.org/

  • Cabrelli Amaro, J., Flynn, S., & Rothman, J. (2012). Third language acquisition in adulthood. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2011). A holistic approach in multilingual education: Introduction. [Special issue toward a multilingual approach in the study of multilingualism in school contexts]. The Modern Language Journal, 95(3), 339–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cenoz, J., & Valencia, J. F. (1994). Additive trilingualism: Evidence from the Basque Country. Applied Psycholinguistics, 15, 195–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cenoz, J., Hufeisen, B., & Jessner, U. (2001a). Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Psycholinguistic perspectives. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cenoz, J., Hufeisen, B., & Jessner, U. (2001b). Looking beyond second language acquisition: Studies in tri- and multilingualism. Tubingen: Stauffenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J. G., & Sanz, C. (2015). Deconstructing PI for the ages: Explicit instruction vs. practice in young and older adult bilinguals. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 53(2), 225–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. (1981). The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority students. In California State Department of Education (Ed.), Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework (pp. 3–49). Los Angeles: Evaluation, Dissemination, and Assessment Center, California State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Angelis, G., & Dewaele, J. M. (2011). New trends in crosslinguistic influence and multilingualism research. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 7–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, S., Foley, C., & Vinnitskaya, I. (2004). The cumulative enhancement model for language acquisition: Comparing adults’ and children’s patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition of relative clauses. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1(1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabrys-Barker, D. (2012). Cross-linguistic influences in multilingual language acquisition. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • García Mayo, M. P., & García Lecumberri, M. L. (2003). Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey, S. (2013). A neurocognitive investigation of bilingual advantages at additional language learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Georgetown University, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigorenko, E. L., Sternber, R. J., & Ehrman, M. E. (2000). A theory-based approach to the measurement of foreign language ability: The canal-F theory and test. The Modern Language Journal, 84(3), 390–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herdina, P., & Jessner, U. (2002). A dynamic model of multilingualism: Perspectives of change in psycholinguistics. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juan-Garau, M., & Salazar-Noguera, J. (2015). Content-based language learning in multilingual educational environments. Berlin: Springer International Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, E. (1995). Second versus third language acquisition: Is there a difference? Language Learning, 45(3), 419–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, W. E. (1981). Bilingualism and language acquisition. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition (pp. 9–22). New York: The New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacWhinney, B., & Bates, E. (1989). The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, B., & Nayak, N. (1989). Processing a new language: Does knowing other languages make a difference? In H. W. Dechert & M. Raupach (Eds.), Interlingual processes (pp. 5–16). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meara, P. M. (2005). Llama language aptitude tests: The manual. Swansea: Lognostics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan-Short, K. (2014). Electrophysiological approaches to understanding second language acquisition: A field reaching its potential. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 15–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nation, R., & McLaughlin, B. (1986). Novices and experts: An information processing approach to the “good language learner” problem. Applied Psycholinguistics, 7(1), 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, N., Hansen, N., Krueger, N., & McLaughlin, B. (1990). Language-learning strategies in monolingual and multilingual adults. Language Learning, 40, 221–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odlin, T. (2012). Nothing will come of nothing. In B. Kortmann & B. Szmrecsanyi (Eds.), Linguistic complexity in interlanguage varieties, and contact languages (pp. 53–73). Frankfurt: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez Vidal, C. (2014). Study abroad and language acquisition: Context and contact matters. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, J. (2011). L3 syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy: The typological primacy model. Second Language Research, 27(1), 107–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanz, C. (1997). Issues in SLA research methodology: Production processes and variability. In W. R. Glass & A. T. Pérez‐Lerroux (Eds.), Current approaches to L1 and L2 acquisition of Spanish. Cambridge: Cascadilla Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanz, C. (2000). Bilingual education enhances third language acquisition: Evidence from Catalonia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanz, C., Lin, H., Lado, B., Bowden, H. B., & Stafford, C. A. (2009). Concurrent verbalizations, pedagogical conditions, and reactivity: Two CALL studies. Language Learning, 59(1), 33–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanz, C., Park, H. I., & Lado, B. (2014). A functional approach to cross-linguistic influence in ab initio L3 acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. doi:10.1017/S1366728914000285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12, 40–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, C., Sanz, C., & Bowden, W. H. (2010). An experimental study of early L3 development: Age, bilingualism and classroom exposure. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(2), 162–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M., Lapkin, S., Rowen, N., & Hart, D. (1990). The role of mother tongue literacy in third language learning. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 3(1), 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, A. S. (2013). The interface of language aptitude and multilingualism: Reconsidering the bilingual/multilingual dichotomy. The Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 685–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ushioda, E. (2001). Language learning at university: Exploring the role of motivational thinking. In Z. Dornyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 69–90). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D., Spratt, J., & Ezzaki, A. (1989). Does learning to read in a second language always put the child at a disadvantage? Some counterevidence from Morocco. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 31–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winke, P. (2013). An investigation into second language aptitude for advanced Chinese language learning. Modern Language Journal, 97(1), 109–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Beatriz Lado or Cristina Sanz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Lado, B., Sanz, C. (2017). Methods in Multilingualism Research. In: King, K., Lai, YJ., May, S. (eds) Research Methods in Language and Education. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02249-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics