Skip to main content

Discursive Perspectives on Language Policy and Planning

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Discourse and Education

Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of Language and Education ((ELE))

Abstract

This chapter examines language policy and planning (LPP) scholarship that takes a discursive perspective on its object of study, either examining LPP as language-in-use (policy texts, talk about policy, and language practices, themselves) or as normative discourses or as both. This growing body of work using discourse analytic conceptual and methodological tools to analyze LPP brings focus upon the nature of language policy itself, on the locations and actors of LPP and relations among them, and on the roles of structure and agency in policy activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdelhay, A. (2010). A critical commentary on the discourse of language rights in the Naivasha language policy in Sudan using habitus as a method. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 206, 21–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agha, A. (2007). Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacchi, C. (2000). Policy as discourse: What does it mean? Where does it get us? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 21(1), 45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (1993). What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. Discourse: The Australian. Journal of Educational Studies, 13(2), 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barakos, E., Unger, J. W. (Eds.). (2016). Discursive approaches to language policy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, L., & Vavrus, F. (2014). Transversing the vertical case study: A methodological approach to studies of educational policy as practice. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 45(2), 131–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackledge, A. (2006). The magical frontier between the dominant and the dominated: Sociolinguistics and social justice in a multilingual world. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 27(1), 22–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blommaert, J. (1996). Language planning as a discourse on language and society: The linguistic ideology of a scholarly tradition. Language Problems and Language Planning, 20(3), 199–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonacina-Pugh, F. (2012). Researching 'practiced language policies': Insights from conversation analysis. Language Policy, 11, 213–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canagarajah, S. (2013). Translingual practices: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canagarajah, S., & Ashraf, H. (2013). Multilingualism and education in South Asia: Resolving policy/practice dilemmas. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 33, 258–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J., Slembrouck, S., & Baynham, M. (Eds.). (2009). Globalization and language in contact: Scale, migration, and communicative practices. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Combs, M. C., González, N., & Moll, L. C. (2011). US Latinos and the learning of English: The metonymy of language policy. In T. L. McCarty (Ed.), Ethnography and language policy (pp. 184–203). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. A. (2014). Engaged language policy and practices. Language Policy, 13, 83–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bres, J. (2015). Introduction: Language policies on social network sites. Language Policy, 14(4), 309–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores, N. (2013). Silencing the subaltern: Nation-state/colonial governmentality and bilingual education in the United States. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 10(4), 263–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1972). The discourse on language (trans: A. M. S. Smith.). In The archaeology of knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornberger, N. H. (1996). Indigenous literacies in the Americas: Language planning from the bottom up. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornberger, N. H., & Johnson, D. C. (2007). Slicing the onion ethnographically: Layers and spaces in multilingual language education policy and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 41(3), 509–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hult, F. M. (2010). Analysis of language policy discourses across the scales of space and time. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 202, 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D. H. (1964). Introduction: Toward ethnographies of communication. American Anthropologist, 66(6), 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A. (1999). Ideologies in action: Language politics on Corsica. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. C. (2011). Critical discourse analysis and the ethnography of language policy. Critical Discourse Studies, 8(4), 267–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. C. (2013). Language policy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. C., & Freeman, R. (2010). Appropriating language policy on the local level: Working the spaces for bilingual education. In K. Menken & O. García (Eds.), Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators as policymakers (pp. 13–31). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. C., & Johnson, E. J. (2015). Power and agency in language policy appropriation. Language Policy, 14(3), 221–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karam, F. X. (1974). Toward a definition of language planning. In J. A. Fishman (Ed.), Advances in language planning (pp. 103–124). The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makoni, S., & Pennycook, A. (2007). Disinventing and reconstituting languages. In S. Makoni & A. Pennycook (Eds.), Disinventing and reconstituting languages (pp. xxi–x41). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, T. L. (Ed.). (2011). Ethnography and language policy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menken, K. (2008). English learners left behind: Standardized testing as language policy. Buffalo, NY: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menken, K., & García, O. (2010). Introduction. In K. Menken & O. García (Eds.), Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators as policymakers (pp. 1–10). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, K. S. (2013). Communicative event chains in an ethnography of Paraguayan language policy. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 219, 67–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, K. S. (2016). Producing change and stability: A scalar analysis of Paraguayan bilingual education policy implementation. Linguistics and Education, 34, 58–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, A. (2002). Language policy and docile bodies: Hong Kong and governmentality. In J. W. Tollefson (Ed.), Language policies in education: Critical issues (pp. 91–110). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phyak, P., & Bui, T. T. N. (2014). Youth engaging language policy and planning: Ideologies and transformations from within. Language Policy, 13, 101–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricento, T. K., & Hornberger, N. (1996). Unpeeling the onion: Language planning and policy and the ELT professional. TESOL Quarterly, 30(3), 401–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, R. (1984). Orientations in language planning. NABE Journal, 8(2), 15–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxena, M., & Martin-Jones, M. (2013). Multilingual resources in classroom interaction: Ethnographic and discourse analytic perspectives. Language and Education, 27(4), 285–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2004). Nexus analysis: Discourse and the emerging Internet. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, M., & Urban, G. (1996). The natural history of discourse. In M. Silverstein & G. Urban (Eds.), Natural histories of discourse (pp. 1–17). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson, J. W. (1991). Planning language, planning inequality: Language policy in the community. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. (1996). Disorders of discourse. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R., & Fairclough, N. (2010). Recontextualizing European higher education policies: The cases of Austria and Romania. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(1), 19–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazan. (2015). Adhering to the language roots: Ottoman Turkish campaigns on Facebook. Language Policy, 14(4), 335–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katherine S. Mortimer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Mortimer, K.S. (2017). Discursive Perspectives on Language Policy and Planning. In: Wortham, S., Kim, D., May, S. (eds) Discourse and Education. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02243-7_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics