Skip to main content

Professional Values: The Use of Technology and the New Generation of Clinicians

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Smart Homes, Health Care and Well-Being

Abstract

For care professionals, the main drive and, related to that, their job satisfaction, is based on being able to satisfy the needs of those who receive their care. Furthermore, most professionals working in contexts in which chronic care is provided, value inter-collegial respect and appreciation of supervisors. Therefore, success and failure factors of implementation of technology in health-care situations are associated with the disruption or support of these values. Mostly, health-care professionals do not themselves think about technological solutions for clinical problems, and therefore, they need support in relating technological solutions to care recipients’ needs. In this chapter, a short overview of professional values is given. Next, we outline how technology can be seen as disrupting professional values but also how it can be supportive of professional values, sometimes unexpected, as practice examples show. The chapter is concluded by consequences for daily practice and education in health-care professions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brownie S, Nancarrow S (2013) Effects of person-centered care on residents and staff in aged-care facilities: a systematic review. Clin Interv Aging 8:1–10. doi:10.2147/CIA.S38589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen MC, Remler D (2009) Information and communications technology in U.S. health care: why is adoption so slow and is slower better? J Health Polit Policy Law 34(6):1011–1034. doi:10.1215/03616878-2009-034, [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13:319–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferlie E, Fitzgerald L, Wood M, Hawkins C (2005) The nonspread of innovations: the mediating role of professionals. Acad Manage J 48(1):117–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forkner-Dunn J (2003) Internet-based patient self-care: the next generation of health care delivery. J Med Internet Res 5(2):e8. doi:10.2196/jmir.5.2.e8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris EG, Dearth R, Paul S (2007) Examining the relationship between patient orientation and job satisfaction in health care: evidence from the nursing profession. Health Mark Q 24(1–2):1–14. doi:10.1080/07359680802125709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho K, Ellaway R, Littleford J, Hayward R, Hurley K (2014) The CanMeds 2015 eHealth expert working group report. The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Ottawa. Retrieved on March 9th 2015 from http://www.royalcollege.ca/portal/page/portal/rc/common/documents/canmeds/framework/ehealth_ewg_report_e.pdf

  • Holden RJ, Karsh BT (2010) The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inform 43(1):159–172. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002, [Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Review]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston K, Behl D, Zeckzer Walters K (2014) Using telepractice to improve outcomes for children who are deaf or hard of hearing & their families. The NCHAM eBook. A resource guide for early hearing detection and intervention. Utah State University, Logan. Retrieved from http://www.infanthearing.org/ehdi-ebook/

  • Ketikidis P, Dimitrovski T, Lazuras L, Bath PA (2012) Acceptance of health information technology in health professionals: an application of the revised technology acceptance model. Health Informatics J 18(2):124–134. doi:10.1177/1460458211435425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krijgsman J, Peeters J, Burghouts A, Brabers A, de Jong J, Beenkens F, van Gennip L (2014) Op naar weerwaarde! Nictiz/Nivel, Utrecht/The Hague. Retrieved from https://www.nictiz.nl/page/eHealth/eHealth-monitor

  • Larrabee JH, Janney MA, Ostrow CL, Withrow ML, Hobbs GR Jr, Burant C (2003) Predicting registered nurse job satisfaction and intent to leave. J Nurs Adm 33(5):271–283, [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lluch M (2011) Healthcare professionals’ organisational barriers to health information technologies-a literature review. Int J Med Inform 80(12):849–862. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.09.005, [Review]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorig KR, Holman H (2003) Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med 26(1):1–7, [Editorial Research Support, U.S. Gov’t, P.H.S. Review]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May C (2013) Towards a general theory of implementation. Implement Sci 8:18. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-18, [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMullan M (2006) Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient-health professional relationship. Patient Educ Couns 63(1–2):24–28. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.006, [Review]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieboer ME, van Hoof J, Van Hout AM, Aarts S, Wouters EJM (2014) Professional values, technology and future health care: the view of health care professionals in The Netherlands’ Technology in Society, 39, 10–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan M, Nolan J, Grant G (1995) Maintaining nurses’ job satisfaction and morale. Br J Nurs 4(19):1149–1154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan M, Brown J, Naughton M, Nolan J (1998) Developing nursing’s future role. 2: nurses’ job satisfaction and morale. Br J Nurs 7(17):1044–1048. doi:10.12968/bjon.1998.7.17.5602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, S, Fiechtl, B, Rule,S (2012) An evaluation of virtual home visits in early intervention: feasibility of “virtual intervention”. The volta review 112(3):267–281, Washington, DC, AG Bell Association for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing. Retrieved from: http://www.listeningandspokenlanguage.org/uploadedFiles/Connect/Publications/The_Volta_Review/TVR112(3).pdf

  • Palm E (2013) Who cares? Moral obligations in formal and informal care provision in the light of ICT-based home care. Health Care Anal 21(2):171–188. doi:10.1007/s10728-011-0199-3, [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peek ST, Wouters EJ, van Hoof J, Luijkx KG, Boeije HR, Vrijhoef HJ (2014) Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform 83(4):235–248. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004, [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poon EG, Jha AK, Christino M, Honour MM, Fernandopulle R, Middleton B, Kaushal R (2006) Assessing the level of healthcare information technology adoption in the United States: a snapshot. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 6:1. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-6-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafferty AM, Ball J, Aiken LH (2001) Are teamwork and professional autonomy compatible, and do they result in improved hospital care? Qual Health Care 10(Suppl 2):ii32–ii37, [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders C, Rogers A, Bowen R, Bower P, Hirani S, Cartwright M, Newman SP (2012) Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the Whole System Demonstrator trial: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 12:220. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-220, [Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steventon A, Bardsley M, Billings J, Dixon J, Doll H, Hirani S, Newman S (2012) Effect of telehealth on use of secondary care and mortality: findings from the Whole System Demonstrator cluster randomised trial. BMJ 344:e3874. doi:10.1136/bmj.e3874, [Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stredler-Brown A (ed.) (2012), Current knowledge and best practices for telepractice. The Volta Rev 112(3), Washington, DC, AG Bell Association for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing. Retrieved from: http://www.listeningandspokenlanguage.org/uploadedFiles/Connect/Publications/The_Volta_Review/TVR112(3).pdf

  • Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 27:425–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetter B, van der Vlies M (2014) Eindrapport eSova pilot. Internal report, Royal Kentalis, Sint-Michielsgestel

    Google Scholar 

  • Westbrook JI, Braithwaite J (2010) Will information and communication technology disrupt the health system and deliver on its promise? Med J Aust 193(7):399–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Willems D (2004) Geavanceerde thuiszorgtechnologie: morele vragen bij een ethisch ideaal (Advanced home care technology: moral questions about an ethical ideal). Gezondheidsraad, signalering ethiek en gezondheid, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eveline J. M. Wouters .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Wouters, E.J.M., Weijers, T.C.M., Nieboer, M.E. (2017). Professional Values: The Use of Technology and the New Generation of Clinicians. In: van Hoof, J., Demiris, G., Wouters, E. (eds) Handbook of Smart Homes, Health Care and Well-Being. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01583-5_51

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics