Skip to main content

Equitably Sharing Benefits Arising from Utilization of Genetic Resources: Lessons Learned for Climate Resilient Society, Today

Lessons Learned for Climate Resilient Society, Today

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Climate Resilient Societies
  • 69 Accesses

Abstract

Sharing benefits from genetic resources might be useful in applying equity to develop a framework for climate resilience society. The question is who will pay more for the resilience of society by giving more to achieve such a goal. Genetic resources have been considered as assets while they might give (and they have given) benefits for those researching them. Therefore, elements might be derived from the benefits of bringing the criteria for sharing equitably. As well, this carries the question of who will pay for what and how much will everyone pay for what. This is reflected in international law derived from international policies on climate change and resilience. Besides, it is possible to consider the effects of the loss of genetic resources from plants, animals, and microorganisms with climate resilience. The hypothesis of this contribution is that process of sharing equitably benefits from genetic resources gives criteria to face the burdens of communities confronting the adverse effects of climate change and provoking resilience. Results from the benefits of genetic resources might generate climate resilience among communities, risking the adverse effects of climate change because these gains might provoke better outcomes for communities and less advantageous people as a whole due to life preservation, in the whole sense of the word.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alyward, B. (2007). The role of plant screening and plant supply in biodiversity conservation, drug development, and health care. In T. Swanson (Ed.), Intellectual property rights and biodiversity conservation an interdisciplinary analysis of the values of medicinal plants (pp. 67–93). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazil. (2015). Ley 13123. Brasilia: Government of Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgman, H., & Oliver, J. (2006). The global climate system, patterns, processes, and teleconnections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Contreras, A., Ciampi, L., Padulosi, S. et al. (1993). Potato germplasm collecting expedition to the Guaitecas and chonos Archipelagos, Chile, 1990. Potato Res 36, 309–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02361797.

  • Crutzen, P., & Golitsyn, G. (1992). Linkages between global warming, ozone depletion, acid deposition and other aspects of global environmental change. In I. Mintzer (Ed.), Confronting climate change (pp. 15–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • De Jonge, B., & Louwars, N. (2009). The diversity of principles underlying the concept of benefit sharing. In E. Chege Kamau & G. Winter (Eds.), Genetic resources, traditional knowledge and the law, solutions for access and benefit sharing (pp. 57–76). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization. (2019). The benefit sharing fund, crop diversity for food security. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grub, M., Sebenius, J., Magalhaes, A., & Suban, S. (1992). Sharing the burden. In I. Mintzer (Ed.), Confronting climate change (pp. 305–322). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • India. (2002). The Biological Diversity Act, 2002. New Delhi: Ministry of Law and Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2018). Global warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty (eds: Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner H-O, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla PR, Pirani A, Moufouma-Okia W, Péan C, Pidcock R, Connors S, Matthews JBR, Chen Y, Zhou X, Gomis MI, Lonnoy E, Maycock T, Tignor M, Waterfield T). Bonn: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Issleib, S. (2015). Equity and power in a cooperative trial and error game. London: London School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, R. (2011a). Humans are driving extreme weather, time to prepare. Science, 334(6059), 1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, R. (2011b). Time to adapt to a warming world, but where is the science? Science, 334(6059), 1052–1053.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, K. A. (2001). Exploring the corridor concept. Missoula: The University of Montana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendel, G. (1866). Versuche ueber Pflanzenhybriden. In Verhandlungen der naturforschendes Vereines in Bruenn (Bd. IV fuer das Jahr 1865, Abhandlungen, S. 3–47).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair, P. (2011). International initiatives for regulating access to genetic resources. Cochin: Cocin Univeristy of Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napolitano, C., et al. (2015). Reduced diversity and increased dispersal in Guigna (Leopardus guigna) in Chilean fragmented landscapes. Journal of Heredity, 106(S1), 522–536. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esv025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nax, H. H. (2010). Evolutionary cooperative games. Oxford: University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, P. (2000). Climate for change, non-state actors and the global politics of greenhouse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, F. (2005). Environmental change: Key issues ad alternative approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, V. R., & Iwanaga, M. (1997). Utilization of plant genetic resources. In K. Watanabe & P. Eija (Eds.), Plant biotechnology and plant genetic resources for sustainability and productivity (pp. 29–70). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, J. (2020). Reflections on the pandemic. https://sites.google.com/site/josephnraz/something-to-think-about. Accessed 20 May 2020.

  • Schroeder, D. (2007). Benefit sharing: It’s time for a definition. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33, 205–209. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2006.016790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, R. K., Talla, A., Swain, D. K. et al. (2019). Quantitative Approaches in Adaptation Strategies to Cope with Increased Temperatures Following Climate Change in Potato Crop. Potato Res. 62, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-018-9406-z.

  • Stoll, P.-T. (2009). Access to genetic resources and benefit sharing – Underlying concepts and the idea of justice. In E. Chege Kamau & G. Winter (Eds.), Genetic resources, traditional knowledge and the law, solutions for access and benefit sharing. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFCC. (2020). Global stockade. Bonn: Secretariat of the United Nations Framework Convention of Climate Change. https://unfccc.int/topics/science/workstreams/global-stocktake-referred-to-in-article-14-of-the-paris-agreement. Accessed 25 July 2020.

  • United Nations. (1992). Convention on Biological Diversity, Rio de Janeiro.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2001). International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2010). Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Nagoya: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2015). Paris Agreement, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. D., & Crick, F. H. (1953). Molecular structure of nucleic acids; a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature, 171(4356), 737–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WBCSD. (2019). Business climate resilience, thriving through the transformation. Geneva: World Business Council for Sustainable Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, K. J., & Bhagwat, S. A. (2009). Biodiversity and climate change. Science, 326(5954), 806–807. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1178838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2015). Operational framework for building climate resilience health system. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergio Peña-Neira .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Peña-Neira, S. (2021). Equitably Sharing Benefits Arising from Utilization of Genetic Resources: Lessons Learned for Climate Resilient Society, Today. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Climate Resilient Societies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32811-5_101-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32811-5_101-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32811-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32811-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics