Skip to main content

Learning to Change and Changing to Learn

Conceptions of Teaching Improvement Through a Faculty-Centered Lens

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research

Part of the book series: Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research ((HATR,volume 35))

Abstract

This chapter critically reviews the extant literature on teaching improvement in higher education, noting historical efforts by stakeholders to improve teaching yet suggesting that research has not centered on faculty members’ perspectives from inside their own teaching efforts. We offer an alternative framework for thinking about and studying teaching improvement which, viewed through the lenses of faculty learning and faculty change, seeks to reposition faculty members at the center of this work. This chapter is divided into six sections: (a) overview of key terms and theoretical framing, (b) overview and critique of policy-driven and programmatic approaches that have dominated the teaching improvement landscape in higher education, critical discussion of the interdisciplinary literature on conceptualizations of what “good” teaching entails, and a view of teaching improvement through the lenses of (c) learning and (d) change, (e) an exploration of an example of teaching improvement efforts as viewed through these lenses, and (f) implications for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Newburyport: Sloan Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Academy of Arts and Sciences. (2017). The future of undergraduate education: The future of America. A report by the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Cambridge, MA, American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Retrieved online at https://www.amacad.org/cfue

  • Angelo, T. A. (1997). The campus as learning community: Seven promising shifts and seven powerful levers. AAHE Bulletin, 49(9), 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelo, T. A. (2001). Doing faculty development as if we value learning most: Transformative guidelines from research and practice. To Improve the Academy, 19(1), 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. New York: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arum, R., Roksa, J., & Cook, A. (2016). Improving quality in American higher education: Learning outcomes and assessments for the 21st century. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, A. E. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academic career. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 94–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, A. E., Connelly, M. R., & Colbeck, C. L. (2008). Strategies for preparing integrated faculty: The center for the Integration of research, teaching, and Learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 113, 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barger, S., & Webb, N. (2006). Delta participation and the attitudes, beliefs, and professional development experiences of doctoral students and postdoctoral researchers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) at the University of Wisconsin–Madison: A report for the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning. Madison: Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning, University of Wisconsin–Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27(6), 12–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beach, A. L., Sorcinelli, M., Austin, A. E., & Rivard, J. K. (2016). Faculty development in the age of evidence: Current practices, future imperatives. Sterling: Stylus Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, R. (1988). How colleges work: The cybernetics of academic organization and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergquist, W. H. (1992). The four cultures of the academy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R. T., Pellino, G., Boberg, A., & O’Connell, C. (1980). Faculty development programs, the improvement of instruction, and faculty goals: An evaluation. In Current issues in higher education (pp. 32–48). Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, D. C. (2006). The seizing initiative for quality education. Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, 14(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (1991). Reframing organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., & Middleton, H. (2003). Learning from others at work: Communities of practice and informal learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 15(5), 194–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (Eds.). (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. New York: Nichols Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (Vol. 16). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brint, S. (2009). Focus on the classroom: Movements to reform college teaching and learning, 1980–2008. In J. C. Hermanowicz (Ed.), The American academic profession: Transformation in contemporary higher education (pp. 44–91). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. (1987). Developing critical thinkers. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. (1995). Adult learning: An overview. International Encyclopedia of Education, 10, 375–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownell, S. E., & Tanner, K. D. (2012). Barriers to faculty pedagogical change: Lack of training, time, incentives, and… tensions with professional identity? CBE – Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 339–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1960.) The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 2016. Business Roundtable Talent Survey. Retrieved from http://businessroundtable.org/sites/default/files/immigration_reports/BRT%20Work%20in%20_Progress_0.pdf

  • Burke, W. W., & Noumair, D. A. (2015). Organization development: A process of learning and changing. Upper Saddle River: NJ, FT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, B. (1996). Managing change: A strategic approach to organizational dynamics. London: Pitman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C. M., & O’Meara, K. (2014). Faculty agency: Departmental contexts that matter in faculty careers. Research in Higher Education, 55(1), 49–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1972). The organizational saga in higher education. Administrative Science Quarterly, 178–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J. S. (1996). Faculty receptivity/resistance to change, personal and organizational efficacy, decision deprivation and effectiveness in research I universities. ASHE Annual Meeting Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. K. (1988). Teaching practice: Plus ça change (pp. 27–84). East Lansing: National Center for Research on Teacher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M., March, J., & Olsen, J. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colbeck, C. (2002). State policies to improve undergraduate teaching: Administrator and faculty responses. Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, D. (2005). Organizational change: Sociological perspectives. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Condon, W., Iverson, E. R., Manduca, C. A., Rutz, C., & Willett, G. (2016). Faculty development and student learning: Assessing the connections. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, C., & Kaplan, M. (2011). Advancing the culture of teaching on campus: How a teaching center can make a difference. Sterling: Stylus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, R. (Ed.). (2001). Technology and the market: Demand, users and innovation. New York: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council for Higher Education Accreditation. (2004). Balancing competing goods: Accreditation and information to the public about quality. Washington, DC: Council for Higher Education Accreditation. Retrieved from https://www.chea.org/userfiles/Letters%20from%20the%20President/PresLtr_InformPublic_0304.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, K. P. (1990). Teaching to improve learning. Journal of Excellence in College Teaching, 1, 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, J. W. (2014). The employment status of instructional staff members in higher education. Washington, DC: American Association of University Professors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1902). The child and the curriculum. In R. D. Archambault (Ed.), John Deweyon education: Selected writings (pp. 339–358). Chicago: University of Chicago. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916). The nature of subject matter. In R. D. Archambault (Ed.), On education: Selected writings (pp. 339–358). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drezner, N. D., Pizmony-Levy, O., & Pallas, A. M. (2018). Americans’ views of higher education as a public and private good. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duderstadt, J. J. (2001). Preparing future faculty for future universities. Liberal Education, 24–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, G. H., Jr. (1998). The life course as developmental theory. Child Development, 69(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle: Selected papers. Psychological Issues, 1, 1–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, J. (2002). The mythologies of faculty productivity: Implications for institutional policy and decision making. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 26–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, J. S., & Beach, A. L. (2002). Variations in faculty work at research universities: Implications for state and institutional policy. The Review of Higher Education, 26(1), 97–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, J. S., & Rhoads, R. A. (1995). Teaching and the faculty role: Enhancing the commitment to instruction in American colleges and universities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(2), 179–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1974). Conscientisation. CrossCurrents, 24(1), 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, S. H., & Teodorescu, D. (2001). Teaching excellence: How faculty guided change at a research university. The Review of Higher Education, 24(4), 397–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginder, S. A., Kelly-Reid, J. E., & Mann, B. F. (2018). Enrollment and employees in postsecondary institutions. Financial Statistics and Academic Libraries, Fiscal Year 2017 (Preliminary Data) (NCES 2019-021). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, C. R. (2012). Digitally-mediated teaching and professors’ professional worlds and identities: A faculty learning and professional growth perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Las Vegas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassick, C. E., Huber, M. T., & Maeroff, G. I. (1997). Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, S. R., Britt, M. A., Brown, W., Cribb, C., George, M. A., Greenleaf, C., Lee, C. D., & Shanahan, C. (2016). Disciplinary literacies and learning to read for understanding: A conceptual framework for disciplinary literacy. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 219–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, N., Moll, L., & Amanti, C. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravani, M. (2007). Unveiling professional learning: Shifting from the delivery of courses to an understanding of the processes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 688–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, K. D. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1989). Extragalactic reality: The case of gravitational lensing. Philosophy of Science, 56(4), 555–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F., & Hakel, M. D. (2002). Learning that lasts a lifetime: Teaching for long-term retention and transfer. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2002(89), 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, D. T. (2001). Exploring the moral heart of teaching: Toward a teacher’s creed. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haras, C., Taylor, S. C., Sorcinelli, M. D., & von Hoene, L. (2017). Institutional commitment to teaching excellence: Assessing the impacts and outcomes of faculty development. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1991). What is feminist epistemology. In Whose science? Whose knowledge (pp. 105–137). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heasley, C., Terosky, A. L., & Ryan, D. (2018). Grappling with complexity: Faculty perspectives on the influence of community engaged teaching on student learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Tampa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1807). Hegel’s phenomenology of spirit. Trans. A. V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, J. H. (2012). Faculty development programs: The frequency and variety of professional development programs available to online instructors. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(5), 87–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollands, F. M., & Tirthali, D. (2014). Why do institutions offer MOOCs? Online Learning, 18(3), n3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, D. M. (1998). Adoption patterns of faculty who integrate Computer technology for teaching and learning in higher education. In World conference on educational multimedia and hypermedia & world conference on educational telecommunications. Proceedings (10th), Freiburg, June 20–25, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jick, T. D., & Sturtevant, K. D. (2017). Taking stock of 30 years of change management: Is it time for a reboot? In Research in organizational change and development (pp. 33–79). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2000). Choices, values, and frames. In D. Kahneman & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 1–16). New York: Russell Sage Foundation/Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalivoda, P., Sorrell, G. R., & Simpson, R. D. (1994). Nurturing faculty vitality by matching institutional interventions with career-stage needs. Innovative Higher Education, 18(4), 255–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, S., Sutherland, S., & Earl, L. (2005). Toward an evaluation habit of mind: Mapping the journey. Teachers College Record, 107(10), 2326–2350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A. (2001). Investigating organizational fit in a participatory leadership environment. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 23(1), 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A. (2011). Understanding and facilitating organizational change in the 21st century: Recent research and conceptualizations: ASHE-ERIC higher education report, Volume 28, Number 4 (Vol. 155). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A., & Sam, C. (2011). Understanding non-tenure track faculty: New assumptions and theories for conceptualizing behavior. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(11), 1419–1442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, S. (1991). Social science and the self: Personal essays on an art form. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., & Ikenberry, S. O. (2009). More than you think, less than we need: Learning outcomes assessment in American higher education. The National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment in Champaign, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., & O’Donnell, K. (2013b). Ensuring quality & taking high-impact practices to scale. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges & Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University ofChicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lattuca, L. R. (2001). Creating interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary research and teaching among college and university faculty. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lattuca, L.R. (2002) Learning interdisciplinarity. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(6):711–739

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazerson, M., Wagener, U., & Shumanis, N. (1999). What makes a revolution: Teaching and learning in higher education, 1980–2000 (Report No. NCPI-TR-5-11). Stanford: National Center for Postsecondary Improvement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, A., & Murray, U. (1986). Organizational transformation: Approaches, strategies, theories. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1(1), 5–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, D. (2005). Beyond faculty development: How centers for teaching and learning can be laboratories for learning. New Directions for Higher Education, 131, 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, D. A., & Guskin, A. E. (2003). 15: The essential role of faculty development in new higher education models. To Improve the Academy, 21(1), 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (Eds.). (2001). Teachers caught in the action: Professional development that matters. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, G., & Cox, R. (2001). Assessing: Student assessment. In: Learning and teaching in higher education: The reflective practitioner. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindholm, J. A. (2003). Perceived organizational fit: Nurturing the minds, hearts and personal ambitions of university faculty. Review of Higher Education, 27(1), 125–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane, B. (2006). The academic citizen: The virtue of service in university life. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(5), 551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marris, P. (2014). Loss and change (psychology revivals): Revised edition. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1972). The Marx-Engels reader (Vol. 4). New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menges, R. J., & Austin, A. E. (2001). Teaching in higher education. Handbook of Research on Teaching, 4, 1122–1156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millet, C. M., Payne, D. G., Dwyer, C. A., Stickler, L. M., & Alexiou, J. J. (2008). A culture of evidence: An evidence-centered approach to accountability for student learning outcomes. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moje, E. B., Ciechanowski, K. M., Kramer, K., Ellis, L., Carrillo, R., & Collazo, T. (2004). Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(1), 38–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murrell, P. C., Jr. (2001). The community teacher: A new framework for effective urban teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). How people learn II: Learners, contexts, and cultures. Washington, DC, National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2012). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, A. (1998). On experience, memory, and knowing: A post-holocaust (auto)biography. Curriculum Inquiry, 28(4):425–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, A. (2005). Observations: Taking seriously the topic of learning in studies of faculty work and careers. In E. G. Creamer & L. Lattuca (Eds.), New directions for teaching and learning: No. 102. Advancing faculty learning through interdisciplinary collaboration (pp. 63–83). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, A. (2006). Professing passion: Emotion in the scholarship of professors in research universities. American Educational Research Journal 43(3):381–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, A. (2009). Professing to learn: Creating tenured lives and careers in the American research university. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, A. (2012). Organizational cognition in higher education. In The organization of higher education: Managing colleges for a new era (pp. 304–334).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, A. (2014). Staking a claim on learning: What we should know about learning in higher education, and why. Review of Higher Education, 37(2), 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, A. (2015). On experience, memory, and knowing: A post-holocaust (auto)biography. Curriculum Inquiry, 28(4), 425–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, A. (2016). Professing passion: Emotion in the scholarship of professors at research universities. American Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 381–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, A. & Bolitzer, L. (2014). Finding and fostering learning: What college and university leaders need to know and what they can do. New Directions for Higher Education, No. 165. Wiley Periodicals.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newport, F., & Busteed, B. (2017). Why are Republicans down on higher ed? Gallup News.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolle, P. S., & Lou, Y. (2008). Technology adoption into teaching and learning by mainstream university faculty: A mixed methodology study revealing the “how, when, why, and why not”. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39(3), 235–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Meara, K. (2005). Encouraging multiple forms of scholarship in faculty reward systems: Does it make a difference? Research in Higher Education, 46(5), 479–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Meara, K. (2007). Striving for what? Exploring the pursuit of prestige. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 22). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Meara, K. Terosky, A. L. (2010, November/December). Engendering faculty professional growth. Change 42(6), 44–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, P. (1998). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’s life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, P. (2007). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher–s life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallas, A. M. (2011). Assessing the future of higher education. Society, 48(3), 213–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pallas, A. M., & Neumann, A. (2019). Convergent Teaching: Tools to Spark Deeper Learning in College. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallas, A. M., Neumann, A., & Campbell, C. M. (2017). Policies and practices to support undergraduate teaching improvement. An occasional paper for the American Academy of Arts and Sciences Commission on the Future of Undergraduate Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palomba, C. A., & Banta, T. W. (1999). Assessment essentials: Planning, implementing and improving assessment in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T. (2006). How college affects students: Ten directions for future research. Journal of College Student Development, 47(5), 508–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterman, F. P. (1993). Staff development and the process of changing: A teacher’s emerging constructivist beliefs about learning and teaching. The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education, 227–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center. (2017). Sharp partisan divisions in views of National Institutions. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plank, K. M., & Kalish, A. (2010). Program assessment for faculty development. In K. J. Gillespie & D. L. Robertson (Eds.), A guide to faculty development (pp. 135–149). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponjuan, L., Conley, V., & Trower, C. (2011). Career stage differences in pre-tenure track faculty perceptions of professional and personal relationships with colleagues. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(3), 319–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puzziferro, M., & Shelton, K. (2009). Supporting online faculty-revisiting the seven principles (a few years later). Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 12(3), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raemdonck, I., Gijbels, D., & van Groen, W. (2014). The influence of job characteristics and self-directed learning orientation on workplace learning. International Journal of Training and Development, 18(3), 188–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reder, M. (2007). Does your college really support teaching and learning? peerReview. Association of American Colleges & Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, C. (2002). Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. The Teachers College Record, 104(4), 842–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, S. (2005). International perspectives on teacher professional development: Changes influenced by politics, pedagogy and innovation. Nova Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(1), 7–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Aldershot: Arena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, J. H., & Finkelstein, M. J. (2006). The American faculty: The restructuring of academic work and careers. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J. (1983). The practical 4: Something for curriculum professors to do. Curriculum Inquiry, 13(3), 239–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, T. A., Gillig, B., Hanson, J. M., Pascarella, E. T., & Blaich, C. F. (2014). The conditional nature of high impact/good practices on student learning outcomes. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(4), 531–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, W. L., & Cartwright, G. P. (1998). New ways to link technology and faculty development. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 30(5), 50–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1981). A view from educational psychology. Educational Theory, 31(1), 37–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1993). Teaching as community property. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 25(6), 6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1999). Taking learning seriously. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 31(4), 10–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (2004). Teaching as community property: Essays on higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spörn, B. (1999). Towards more adaptive universities: Trends of institutional reform in Europe. Higher Education in Europe, 24(1), 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunal, D. W., Hodges, J., Sunal, C. S., Whitaker, K. W., Freeman, L. M., Edwards, L., & Odell, M. (2001). Teaching science in higher education: Faculty professional development and barriers to change. School Science and Mathematics, 101(5), 246–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tagg, J. (2012). Why does the faculty resist change? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 44(1), 6–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamborini, C. R., Kim, C., & Sakamoto, A. (2015). Education and lifetime earnings in the United States. Demography, 52(4), 1383–1407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, S. I. (1997). Enhancing continuous learning: Diagnostic findings from multiple companies. Human Resource Management: . Published in Cooperation with the School of Business Administration, The University of Michigan and in alliance with the Society of Human Resources Management, 36(4), 437–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, S. I., Beard, R. L., McNall, L. A., & Salas, E. (2010). Informal learning and development in organizations. Learning, Training, and Development in Organizations, 303–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terosky, A. L. (2005). Taking teaching seriously: A study of university professors and their undergraduates. Unpublished dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terosky, A. L. (2019). Wings of an actor: The role of relationships in women scholars’ intellectual trajectories. The Review of Higher Education, 43(1), 25–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terosky, A. L., & Gonzales, L. D. (2015, April). Scholarly learning as vocation: A study of community and broad access liberal arts college faculty. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terosky, A. L., & Gonzales, L. (2016, Winter). Re-envisioned contributions: Experiences of faculty employed at institutional types that differ from their original aspirations. The Review of Higher Education, 39(2), 241–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terosky, A. L., & Heasley, C. (2015). Supporting online faculty through a sense of community and collegiality. Online Learning, 19(3), 147–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terosky, A. L., O’Meara, K. A., & Campbell, C. M. (2014). Enabling possibility: Women associate professors’ sense of agency in career advancement. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 7(1), 58–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1(1), 39–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiberius, R. G. (2002). A brief history of educational development: Implications for teachers and developers. To Improve the Academy, 20(1), 20–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trowler, P. R. (1998). Academics responding to change. New higher education frameworks and academic cultures. Philadelphia: SRHE, Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trowler, P., & Knight, P. T. (2000). Coming to know in higher education: Theorising faculty entry to new work contexts. Higher Education Research & Development, 19(1), 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umbach, P. D. (2007). How effective are they? Exploring the impact of contingent faculty on undergraduate education. The Review of Higher Education, 30(2), 91–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Census Bureau. (2018). Current population survey (2017 Annual Social and Economic Supplement). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. United States. Demography, 52, 1383–1407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (1995). Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 510–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watty, K. (2006). Want to know about quality in higher education? Ask an academic. Quality in Higher Education, 12(3), 291–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster-Wright, A. (2009). Reframing professional development through understanding authentic professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 702–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieman, C. (2017). Improving how universities teach science: Lessons from the science education initiative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, M. P. A., & Tierney, W. G. (2001). Reforming faculty work: Culture, structure, and the dilemma of organizational change. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1081–1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wortham, S. (2006). Learning identity: The joint emergence of social identification and academic learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M. (2005). Always at odds?: Congruence in faculty beliefs about teaching at a research university. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(3), 331–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. (2004). When good technology means bad teaching: Giving professors gadgets without training can do more harm than good in the classroom, students say. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(12), A31–A37.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aimee La Pointe Terosky .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Terosky, A.L.P., Conway, K. (2020). Learning to Change and Changing to Learn. In: Perna, L. (eds) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol 35. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31365-4_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics