Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion

2020 Edition
| Editors: David A. Leeming

Psychoanalytic Theory and the Hebrew Bible: An Overview

  • Ilona RashkowEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24348-7_9366
  • 1 Downloads

Sigmund Freud once acknowledged that most of his discoveries about the unconscious mind had been anticipated by the poets of the past. Thus, it should not be surprising that psychology has been used in an effort to explain the origins, character, and effects of literature – including the Bible.

What makes a reading of a text “psychoanalytic?” To call a reading “psychoanalytic” or “Freudian” immediately introduces ambiguity because such an expression can refer either to the use of Freudian themes or to Freudian methods. That is, an interpretation of a literary work can be called “Freudian” or “psychoanalytic” with respect either to the substance of the text (what it reads) or to the interpretive procedures and techniques a reader uses (how it reads).

Generally speaking, there are three points at which psychoanalysis can enter the study of a literary work: examining the mind of the author, the minds of the author’s characters, or our own minds. There is a long tradition of Freudian...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Clines, D. J. (1990). What does eve do to help? and other readerly questions to the old testament. Sheffield: Journal for the Study of the Old Testament.Google Scholar
  2. Feldman, Y. S. (1994). And Rebecca loved Jacob: But Freud did not. In Freud and forbidden knowledge. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Freud, S. (1916–1917). The standard works of Sigmund Freud 15 and 16: Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis (Vol. 15, pp. 15–239; Vol. 16, pp. 243–463) (ed and trans: Strachey, J.). London: The Hogarth Press and The Institute of Psycho-analysis.Google Scholar
  4. Freud, S. (1928). The standard works of Sigmund Freud 21: Dostoevsky and Patricide (pp. 177–194) (ed and trans: Strachey, J.). London: The Hogarth Press and The Institute of Psycho-analysis.Google Scholar
  5. Halperin, D. (1993). Seeking Ezekiel: Text and psychology. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Jones, E. (1949). Hamlet and Oedipus. London: Victor Gollancz.Google Scholar
  7. McKnight, E. V. (1988). Post-modern use of the Bible: The emergence of reader-oriented criticism. Nashville: Abingdon.Google Scholar
  8. Rashkow, I. N. (1993). The phallacy of genesis: A feminist- psychoanalytic approach. Louisville: Westminster.Google Scholar
  9. Rashkow, I. N. (2000). Taboo or not taboo: The Hebrew Bible and human sexuality. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  10. Still, J., & Worton, M. (Eds.). (1993). Textuality and sexuality: Reading theories and practices. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Torok, M. (1964). L’envie du Pénis’ Sous la Femme. In La Sexualité Féminine: Nouvelle Recherche Psychanalyse. Paris: Payon.Google Scholar
  12. Wright, E. (Ed.). (1992). Feminism and psychoanalysis: A critical dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Zeligs, D. F. (1988). Psychoanalysis and the Bible: A study in depth of seven leaders. New York: Human Sciences Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Comparative StudiesState University of New York at Stony BrookStony BrookUSA