Skip to main content

Integration

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion
  • 6 Accesses

The integration project is widely viewed as a task undertaken by those interested in combining the concepts, methods, and practices of psychology with the concepts, methods, and practices of religious traditions. While integration necessarily implies discernible attempts to relate psychology and religion in some meaningful way, it is far more than a straightforward procedural undertaking. Stanton L. Jones (2006), a prominent contemporary purveyor of the integration of psychology and Christian faith, as an instance of religion, proposes a categorical approach to view the integration project that illustrates the depth of the project – defending integration, describing integration, and doing integration – and expresses his concern that the time and effort spent defending and defining integration may interfere with doing the actual task itself. While this position regards integration as more than simply an activity, the purpose of defending the intellectual position demonstrating its...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Gleave, R. L., Jensen, D. R., Belisle, R., & Nelson, P. L. (2006). Considering the relationship between religion and psychology. AMCAP Journal, 30(1), 72–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. L. (1994). A constructive relationship for religion with the science and profession of psychology: Perhaps the boldest model yet. American Psychologist, 49(3), 184–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. L. (2006). Integration: Defending it, describing it, doing it. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 34(3), 252–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, F. C. (2006). Psychology and religion: Hermeneutic reflections. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 34(3), 232–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slife, B. D. (2005). Are the natural science methods of psychology compatible with theism? In A. Dueck & C. Lee (Eds.), Why psychology needs theology: A radical-reformation perspective (pp. 163–184). Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Zhang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Zhang, M. (2020). Integration. In: Leeming, D.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24348-7_9282

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics