Skip to main content

Neurology and Psychology of Religion

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 13 Accesses

Recent developments within neuroscience have had a significant influence on a number of disciplines, including psychological and psychoanalytic approaches to religion, providing new evidentiary frameworks of explanation. While there is as yet no final answer to this question, many neurobiologists concur that while human experience is a product of mind and thus generated by brain activity, it would be misleading to “reduce” mind as strictly coterminous with brain function. A growing number of neurobiologists acknowledge the importance of “affect” – emotions and feelings – along with cognitively based symbolic meaning-making activity as integral to understanding the complexity of human experience (Damasio 1994, 2003; Panksepp 1998; Solms and Turnbull 2002; d’Aquili and Newberg 1993, 1998). While the psychology of religion must take seriously neurobiological accounts of mental states that are experienced and described as “mystical,” “unitive,” “ecstatic,” or “transcendent,” it is also...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Bibliography

  • d’Aquili, E., & Newberg, A. (1993). Religious and mystical states: A neuropsychological model. Zygon, 28(2), 177–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Aquili, E., & Newberg, L. (1998). The neuropsychological basis of religions, or why God won’t go away. Zygon, 33(2), 187–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Avon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (2003). Looking for Spinoza: Joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain. Orlando: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1913/2001). The claims of psychoanalysis to scientific interest. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 13, pp. 165–190). London: Vintage, the Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1927/2001). The future of an illusion. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 21, pp. 5–56). London: Vintage, the Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1937/2001). Analysis terminable and interminable. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 23, pp. 216–253). London: Vintage, the Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, B. (2003). Shamans, sorcerers, and saints. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, M. A. (2012). Affective and cognitive dimensions of religious experience: Toward a conceptual/theoretical integrative perspective. Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses, 41(1), 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1902/2004). The varieties of religious experience: A study in human nature. New York: Barnes & Noble Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Williams, D. (2002). The mind in the cave: Consciousness and the origins of art. London: Thanes & Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Williams, D., & Pearce, D. (2005). Inside the neolithic mind: Consciousness, cosmos and the realm of the Gods. London: Thames & Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solms, M. (1997). What is consciousness? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 45, 681–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solms, M., & Neressian, E. (1999). Freud’s theory of affect: Questions for neuroscience. Neuropsychoanalysis, 1, 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solms, M., & Turnbull, O. (2002). The brain and the inner world: An introduction to the neuroscience of subjective experience. New York: Other Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westen, D. (1999). The scientific status of unconscious processes: Is Freud really dead? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 47, 1061–1106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkelman, M. (2004). Shamanism as the original neurotheology. Zygon, 39(1), 193–217.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marsha Aileen Hewitt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Hewitt, M.A. (2020). Neurology and Psychology of Religion. In: Leeming, D.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24348-7_9003

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics