Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion

2020 Edition
| Editors: David A. Leeming

Bion, Wilfred Ruprecht, and “O”

  • John Eric KillingerEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24348-7_841

Speaking of “O”

In seeking to formulate a general theory of the internal object, the British psychoanalyst Wilfred Ruprecht Bion (1897–1979) developed an epistemological understanding of the absolute truth in and of any object. This absolute truth he called O. While O cannot be known, it can be known about – even its presence can be recognized and felt as, for example, in the Zen or Archimedean experience of eureka. But O itself is unknowable.

Knowledge respectfully leads to the indescribable ultimate reality, godhead, or “O,” but the two concepts are not synonymous. Mathematically, Bion might have written this as K → O, not K = O, for K ≠ O. Transformations occur in or under “O,” the godhead rather than imago dei or God, for both imago deiand God are imbued with activity, while the godhead is irreducible to operations. K, which stands for knowledge, is usually referred to by Bion as “curiosity.” Bion often quoted a statement of French author and critic Maurice Blanchot (given him by...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Bion, W. R. (1965). Transformations. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
  2. Bion, W. R. (1970). Attention and interpretation. Northvale: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  3. Bion, W. R. (1984). On arrogance. In Second thoughts: Selected papers on psycho-analysis (pp. 86–92). London: Karnac. (Original work published 1957).Google Scholar
  4. Bion, W. R. (1994). Cogitations (New extended ed.). London: Karnac. (Original work published 1992).Google Scholar
  5. Blanchot, M. (1969). L’Entretien infini [The infinite conversation]. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.Google Scholar
  6. Blanchot, M. (2003). Literary infinity: The aleph (trans: Mandell, C.). In The book to come (pp. 93–96). Stanford: Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1959).Google Scholar
  7. Borges, J. L. (1998). The aleph (trans: Hurley, A.). In Collected fictions (pp. 274–286). New York: Penguin Putnam. (Original work published 1949).Google Scholar
  8. Eckhart, J. (1941). Blessed are the poor (trans: Blakney, R. B.). In Meister Eckhart: A modern translation (pp. 227–232). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  9. Grotstein, J. S. (2000). Bion’s transformations in O. In Who is the dreamer who dreams the dream?: A study of psychic presences (pp. 281–304). Hillsdale: The Analytic Press. (Original work published 1996).Google Scholar
  10. John of the Cross. (1987). The ascent of Mt. Carmel. In K. Kavanaugh (Ed. & Trans.), Selected writtings (pp. 415–154). Mahwah: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
  11. Matt, D. C. (Trans.). (2004). The Zohar. (Pritzger 1). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ruusbroec, J. (1985). The spiritual espousals and other works (trans: Wiseman, J. A.). Mahwah: Paulist Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Intermundia Press, LLCWarrentonUSA