Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion

2020 Edition
| Editors: David A. Leeming

Authoritarian Personality

  • Daniel BurstonEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24348-7_58

Authority and the Father

The “authoritarian personality” is a social psychological construct derived from early psychoanalytic theories of attachment to (and conflict with) the father. To begin with, note that Freud’s own attitude toward paternal authority was profoundly ambiguous. In 1910, Freud attributed Leonardo da Vinci’s astonishing precocity to the fact that he had “escaped being intimidated by his father in earliest childhood,” implying that the routine exercise of paternal authority leads to the suppression of free and unfettered intellectual development in children and, later on, in adults. Without saying so in so many words, Freud’s tribute to Leonardo suggested that childhood and adolescent rebellion against paternal authority is essentially an emancipatory process.

However, 3 years later, in Totem andTaboo, Freud linked rebellion against paternal authority to an intractable ambivalence rooted in our phylogenetic inheritance, which presumably underlies the “collective...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D., & Sanford, R. N. (1952). The authoritarian personality. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  2. Burston, D. (1991). The legacy of Erich Fromm. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burston, D. (1994). Freud the serpent and the sexual enlightenment of children. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 3, 205–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burston, D. (1999). Archetype and interpretation. Psychoanalytic Review, 86(1), 35–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cathier, M. (1971). The life and work of Wilhelm Reich. New York: Avox Books.Google Scholar
  6. Freud, S. (1913). Totem and Taboo. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological work of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 13). London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  7. Fromm, E. (1941). Escape from freedom. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  8. Fromm, E. (1959). Sigmund Freud’s mission: an analysis of his personality and influence. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  9. Fromm, E. (1984). The working class in Weimar Germany. In W. Bonns (Ed.), A psychological and sociological study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Green, M. (1999). Otto Gohi Freudian psychoanalyst (1877–1920). Lewiston: The Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
  11. Jay, M. (1973). The dialectical imagination. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  12. Michaels, J. (1983). Anarchy & Eros: Otto Gross’s impact on German expressionist writers (Utah studies in literature and linguistics). New York: Peter Laing.Google Scholar
  13. Reich, W. (1970). The mass psychology of fascism. New York: Pocket Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyDuquesne UniversityPittsburghUSA