Skip to main content

Psychology

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 33 Accesses

What is psychology? There is little dispute about the broad definition of psychology as the study and understanding of human behavior, cognitive processes, experience, and emotion. However, the history of psychology has been colorful, peppered with disputes about how such understanding and study should be done. The different views on the “how” of psychology have impacted on the psychological study of religion.

This entry will highlight some important features of the history of psychology and suggest how these features may have impacted on the psychological understanding of religion.

Psychology and the Early Study of Religion

In its early days, in the nineteenth and very early twentieth centuries, psychologists had no problems with asking people to introspect or report on their “inner” experiences. Two often-cited examples are (1) the Wurzburg school (Wundt 1902), who asked for detailed introspective reports on what went through people’s minds when they saw a picture, for example, or...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Bibliography

  • Allport, G. W. (1966). The religious context of prejudice. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 5, 448–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, J. (Ed.). (2001). Religion in mind: Cognitive perspectives on religious ritual, belief and experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M. (2000). Psychology and religion. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M., & Beit-Hallahmi, B. (1975). The social psychology of religion. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azari, N. P., Missimer, J., & Seitz, R. J. (2005). Religious experience and emotion: Evidence for distinctive cognitive neural patterns. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 15, 263–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belzen, J. A. (2010). Towards cultural psychology of religion: Principles, approaches, applications. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, L., Pearson, O. R., Carter, M., & Kay, W. K. (1981). Are introverts more religious? The British Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 101–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1927). The future of an illusion. London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1964). New introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granqvist, P., & Kirkpatrick, L. A. (2008). Attachment and religious representations and behaviour. In J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research and clinical applications (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, D., & Morisy, A. (1978). Reports of ecstatic, paranormal, or religious experience in great Britain and the United States: A comparison of trends. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 17, 255–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam, M. R., & Hewstone, M. (1993). Intergroup attributions and affective consequences in majority and minority groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 936–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1902). The varieties of religious experience. New York: Collier.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Loewenthal, K. M. (2000). A short introduction to the psychology of religion. Oxford: Oneworld.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, P. (2014). The neuroscience of religious experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. M. (2009). Psychology, religion and spirituality. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paloutzian, R. F., & Park, C. (2005). Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pargament, K. I., Exline, J., Jones, J., Mahoney, A., & Shafranske, E. (2013). APA handbook of psychology, religion and spirituality. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pyssiainen, I., & Anttonen, V. (Eds.). (2002). Current approaches in the cognitive science of religion. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tacey, D. T. (2004). The spirituality revolution: The emergence of contemporary spirituality. Hove: Brunner-Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B. (1919). Psychology from the standpoint of a behaviorist. Philadelphia: Lippincott.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wundt, W. (1902). Outlines of psychology (trans: Judd, W. H.). Leipzig: Engelman.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Loewenthal, K.M. (2020). Psychology. In: Leeming, D.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24348-7_540

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics